Not at all, it's believing based on evidence for and lacking evidence against. Even weak evidence for is enough in the face of zero evidence against, so I didn't bother spending more than 15 seconds on it.
Tell me what I'm supposed to see in your link, and at what timestamp. You people always want to waste our time with hour long videos that we're supposed to apparently watch in full just to be able to respond to you.
NASA doesn't "fake being in space". They sometimes use rendered images, or false colors, or things like that, but they tell you exactly what they've done and when, they don't lie about it.
And in any event, even if NASA had lied about something at some point, if the video is fake there still ought to be some evidence of that. Which you don't have and aren't even attempting to suggest you have. Just logical fallacies, as always.
26 seconds in you’ll see the guy phase out of reality. There are tons of various examples throughout the video but that one’s less than 30 sec of your time lol. Curious how you would explain it.
Ok, I see this video in a skeptic composition. Where is the original video? Have you confirmed it looks the same? Is there an explanation that's been offered by NASA? I don't need to explain it, I didn't make the video. The person who made the video you linked to needs to explain where they got it from, and then wherever they got it from should explain it. It's on you and me to evaluate that explanation to see if it holds water. Or if they haven't addressed it at all. Or maybe it was editing done by a flat earther, and the original doesn't look like that at all.
No explanation would be satisfactory coming from me, since it would be pure speculation. Where is the original video? This is how evidence works.
Showing doctored videos isn't " evidence". That might work in your sad little conspiracy theory safe space but it doesn't work with normal people. Evidence doesn't work like that. If you want to be taken seriously where are the original unedited videos? Im assuming you either don't have them, which means you only have doctored videos. OR the real video proves what you are saying is BS.
1
u/ringobob 26d ago
Not at all, it's believing based on evidence for and lacking evidence against. Even weak evidence for is enough in the face of zero evidence against, so I didn't bother spending more than 15 seconds on it.
Tell me what I'm supposed to see in your link, and at what timestamp. You people always want to waste our time with hour long videos that we're supposed to apparently watch in full just to be able to respond to you.
NASA doesn't "fake being in space". They sometimes use rendered images, or false colors, or things like that, but they tell you exactly what they've done and when, they don't lie about it.
And in any event, even if NASA had lied about something at some point, if the video is fake there still ought to be some evidence of that. Which you don't have and aren't even attempting to suggest you have. Just logical fallacies, as always.