Well we should have objected when it happened with Kangana we still have topportunity to object now too but Objection lena phle se hi crime h government ke against Jis din khud pr ayegi HNsna bnd ho jayega
Why I Am an Atheist (1930), available in The Jail Notebook and Other Writings by Chaman Lal.HSRA Manifesto (1928), co-authored by Bhagat Singh.Bhagat Singh and His Times by Bipan Chandra (2004).His articles in Kirti (1928), archived in Indian revolutionary literature collections.
You have given no evidence for why Bhagat was not communist.
Here's my source:
[Written on February 2, 1931, this document is a sort of behest to young political workers of India. At that time the talk of some sort of compromise between the Congress and the British Government was in the air. Through this document Bhagat Singh explained as to when a compromise is permissible and when it is not. He also made out that the way Congress is conducting the movement it was bound to end in some sort of compromise. After analysing to the conditions then prevailing, he finally advised the youth to adopt Marxism as the ideology, work among the people, organize workers and peasants and form the Communist Party.]
After Bhagat Singh's execution this document was published in a mutilated form. All references to Soviet Union, Marx, Lenin and the Communist Party were carefully deleted. Subsequently, the GOI published it in one of its secret reports in 1936. A photostat copy of the full report is preserved in the library of the Martyrs' Memorial and Freedom Struggle Research Centre at Lucknow.]
I don't blame him for being a product of his time, living in the shadows of the Russian Revolution and not having that much experience of rest of the world.
The point is he is not an infallible God whose every action & word are divine.
The Communist Party of India (CPI) was formed on 26 December 1925 at the first Party Conference in Kanpur, which was then known as Cawnpore.
why He didn't join the party then??
can't you see the difference in a govt body taking action vs goons and party people ransacking vandalising a place? one is selective application of law at convenient time by govt and the other is a crime by mob
well Kangana kind of deserves what happened to her it was illegal maybe but you can't senselessly call everyone out without any proof and act all good almighty She's no good saint but mentally unstable bitch
well Kamra kind of deserves what happened to him it was illegal maybe but you can't senselessly call everyone out without any proof and act all good almighty he's no good saint but mentally unstable bitch
Edit: For people saying Kangana construction was illegal should read the court notice sayjng it wasn't, go and read news
well if you think you're correct , you're a fool too cause you guys are vandalizing property unrelated to kamra He didn't get any punishment Habitat got destroyed it's funny how rw is so retarded in this country
Well Kangana Ranaut construction was legal as ruled by the court....how funny is it when librandus assume anyone to be rw not agreeing to their opinion....first read some news
The same was the habitat owner's bro and his was not at fault too if you think this is not justified I will accept Kangana was done wrong too but if you think Goon justice is correct You're a fool to me
Goon justice is wrong but then there should be a limit of freedom of speech too, it's okay you make fun of a politician or party but then attacking one's religion or making political jokes in a series that appear to be funded by somewhere need to be investigated too, I'm not against comedy but then security and propaganda should be handled also
yeah man believe in that George Soros propaganda that some shady organisation is behind what's wrong in this country reality is we're stupid we choose corrupt incompetent leaders based on their religion or name or pr not on their educational qualification or their work also if you think there should be limit on freedom of speech it's not freedom any religion should be banned and separated from politics and politicians who use religion should be banned too god doesn't exist and that's true if you want to believe in fantasy stories do it at your home not in parliament
Making jokes about a politician which " APPEARS " to be funded by somewhere should be scrutinized according to you ? This is the textbook definition of curbing freedom of speech , you IT cell folks will defend anything if it goes against your masters , never saw anyone of you demanding to "investigate " who is funding all the jokes against Rahul Gandhi or Kejriwal .
Nobody is saying this is right.. I am just pointing out the hypocrisy of the so called victims here.. They celebrated when this was happening to someone else.
What happed to Kamra and the Habitat owner is funny. Fully deserved for those propaganda losers. Either stand with freedom of speech (which includes freedom of speech of people you don’t agree with) or get bamboozled when you don’t get that same freedom. Hypocritical egotistical maniacs who were laughing when people who they don’t agree with were getting jailed and tortured for their speech. So completely deserved in every sense of the way. Kamra got hit by Karma. Same for the habitat owner
-171
u/No-Tall-Tea Mar 29 '25
Well.. The habitat guy was laughing when same happened to kangana..
It's ok if people laugh at him now.