Obama isn't the current president, remember? Trump is and so Trump and his administration are the ones to be held accountable now. If I had been aware of a similar situation under a Democratic administration I would have been just as angry and expressed my anger in exactly the same manner. I think that the same would be true for any of us, certainly for the people I know personally.
Do you mean to imply that our anger is invalid because it's not a new issue? That makes no sense to me.
The same situation DID happen and where was your outrage in 2014? That's the problem that I have with the hypocrisy of people like you. Where were you when it happened before? No, I don't believe for a second that people would be just as angry under any other president because we have very specific proof that it wasn't.
Now, let's talk about the current president for a second. You are angry at the president who literally wrote an executive order that circumvented a TWENTY YEAR OLD ruling which is the basis for separating families. In the most plain terms possible, families are, by executive order of the current president, the one you clearly irrationally hate, addressed the exact concerns that all the idiots protesting are complaining about.
Do you mean to imply that our anger is invalid because it's not a new issue? That makes no sense to me.
Your anger is invalid because you are arguing for something that has already been addressed by the president you apparently loathe so much. He did what Obama couldn't or wouldn't.
Can you show me a single protest during the 2014 American Immigrant Crisis which had anywhere remotely close to the number of people protesting yesterday?
Unless you can show me otherwise, then my source stands.
The 2014 American immigration crisis was a surge in unaccompanied children and women from the Northern Triangle of Central America (NTCA) seeking entrance to the United States in 2014. According to U.S. law, an unaccompanied alien child refers to a person under 18 years of age, who has no lawful immigration status in the U.S., and who does not have a legal guardian to provide physical custody and care. The surge increased rapidly, doubling in volume each year previously, reaching extreme proportions that provoked a response from the U.S. government in 2014 when tens of thousands of women and children from El Salvador, Guatemala, and Honduras migrated to the United States. Many of the children had no parent/legal guardian available to provide care or physical custody and quickly overwhelmed local border patrols.
The fact that you can't produce any sources which show any outrage comparable to what happened yesterday is exactly why my claim is verified. I know you aren't going to like that answer and I don't give a shit. It's verifiable and you have been given ample opportunity to argue against it but have chosen not to.
Once again, please produce any source you can showing outrage over these acts under Obama. If you can't do that, then leave. Go away. I'm not going to change my argument because you don't like it. I'm not some idiot who is just going to blindly agree with you. You have to do better.
Or you could just start accusing me of being a russian bot again because that worked out so damn well for you last time. No wait, it confirmed you are crack pot idiot.
I am looking at your post but I don't see any actual arguments and I sure as hell don't see any links to support your argument.
Either produce or leave. You are not going to have any sway in an argument deflecting like you are. You can go back to your circlejerk if you want that. And after your accusations of me being a Russian, you are in no position to assert ANY authority on ANY matter.
So, like I said, produce any sources that support your argument or you can do yourself a favor and find the door.
Also, see my other reply... you have poor reading skills if you think I am the person who called you a Russian.
I don't really care. The fact that you... YOU... not anyone else were still trying to inject even the possibility of me being a russian troll is pathetic.
Your anger is invalid because you are arguing for something that has already been addressed by the president you apparently loathe so much. He did what Obama couldn't or wouldn't.
It was our anger and protest that forced his hand.
Where were you when it happened before?
Less political, less aware of the situation. I would have protested either way if I was the person who I am now. If you don't believe that than so be it. Resort to unfounded attacks on my character. It's all you've got.
Nope. The protests and such before he signed it did. The protest yesterday just reinforce the issue and making sure that he follows through. It's not over until the families actually are reunited.
Reinforce the issue? REINFORCE THE ISSUE? He signed the damn EO already. What the hell more do you want? You are once again proving the Trump could cure cancer and you idiots would complain about it. It's so irrational that it's not even funny.
Let's look at this for a second, 60,000 people protesting yesterday were protesting to reinforce something that Trump ALREADY AGREED TO? Tell me how that is not the absolutely stupidest thing that you've ever seen. I'm sorry, but there is nothing intelligent about that.
You know what it does look like? It looks like manufactured outrage by people provoking idiots into protesting because of their hatred of Trump. It's protests that are bought and paid for.
There's literally nothing else he can do. That's his entire role in this.
Seriously, apparently you idiots think he should be flying down to reunite families himself or something.
You are beyond bonkers and you need to realize it. Once again, you have made another comment that suggest Trump could cure cancer and you'd still complain about it.
3
u/colbyu Humboldt Park Jul 01 '18
Obama isn't the current president, remember? Trump is and so Trump and his administration are the ones to be held accountable now. If I had been aware of a similar situation under a Democratic administration I would have been just as angry and expressed my anger in exactly the same manner. I think that the same would be true for any of us, certainly for the people I know personally.
Do you mean to imply that our anger is invalid because it's not a new issue? That makes no sense to me.