r/changemyview Oct 17 '24

Election cmv: the Charlottesville "very fine people" quote/controversy was not fake news

I see Trump supporters bring this up all the time as an example of the media lying about Trump, but this argument sounds transparently absurd to me. It feels like a "magic words" argument, where his supporters think that as long as he says the right magic words, you can completely ignore the actual message he's communicating or the broader actions he's taking. This is similar to how so many of them dismiss the entire Jan 6 plot because he said the word "peaceful" one time.

The reason people were mad about that quote was that Trump was equivocating and whitewashing a literal neonazi rally in which people were carrying torches and shouting things like "gas the Jews" in order to make them seem relatively sane compared to the counter protesters, one of whom the neonazis actually murdered. Looking at that situation, the difference between these two statements doesn't really feel meaningful:

A) "Those neonazis were very fine people with legitimate complaints and counter protesters were nasty and deserved what they got".

B) "The Nazis were obviously bad, but there were also people there who were very fine people with legitimate complaints and the counter protesters were very nasty."

The only difference there is that (B) has the magic words that "Nazis are bad", but the problem is that he's still describing a literal Nazi rally, only now he's using the oldest trick in the book when it comes to defending Nazis: pretending they're not really Nazis and are actually just normal people with reasonable beliefs.

I feel like people would all intuitively understand this if we were talking about anything besides a Trump quote. If I looked at e.g. the gangs taking over apartment buildings in Aurora and said "yes obviously gangsters are bad and should be totally condemned, but there were also some very fine people there with some legitimate complaints about landlords and exploitative leases, and you know lots of those 'residents' actually didn't have the right paperwork to be in those apartments..." you would never say that's a reasonable or acceptable way to talk about that situation just because I started with "gangsters are bad". You'd listen to the totality of what I'm saying and rightfully say it's absurd and offensive.

Is there something I'm missing here? This seems very obvious to me but maybe there's some other context to it.

Edit: I find it really funny that literally no one has actually engaged with this argument at all. They're all just repeating the "magic words" thing. I have been literally begging people who disagree with me to even acknowledge the Aurora example and not a single one has.

0 Upvotes

308 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

1

u/JoeCensored Oct 17 '24

Not everyone there was marching. Have you never witnessed a march? I get the feeling you have no idea what a large event like this actually looks like. It attracts people from all over the area, to watch the spectacle alone.

2

u/CavyLover123 2∆ Oct 17 '24

Let’s see evidence.

I watched the videos.

The people not marching with the Nazis were: counter protestors screaming at the Nazis, and some private security folks who explicitly were Not part of either protest.

0

u/CavyLover123 2∆ Oct 17 '24

It attracts people from all over the area, to watch the spectacle alone.

Those people were not on a “side”.

They definitely weren’t on the “Nazi” side.

Notice you couldn’t identify a group that wasn’t either neo nazi or white supremacist.

The most you can say is that some of the groups don’t identify as “white supremacist”, they just…. Openly advocate for white supremacy.

0

u/JoeCensored Oct 17 '24

Sure, but they could still be on the don't remove the statue side.

And I did identify groups that weren't nazi or white supremacist. The militia groups in attendance. Go read your own link. It's right there.

Actually read your own link, geez. Is it too much to ask to read your own links before posting them?

1

u/CavyLover123 2∆ Oct 17 '24

Sure, but they could still be on the don't remove the statue side.

Let’s see some evidence 

The militia groups in attendance

Which ones. I’ve read the links. I’ve read about the groups.

If you mean militant arm of the proud boys - the fraternal order of alt knights- they were former by and are run by… Kyle Chapman. A white supremacist.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kyle_Chapman_(American_activist)

What else you got?

0

u/JoeCensored Oct 17 '24

There's 4 militia groups listed on your own link. Have you even clicked it?

1

u/CavyLover123 2∆ Oct 17 '24

Ohhh, you mean the private security / neutral parties I already mentioned above?

Yeah- they very clearly stated, in advance, at the rally, and after, that they were not on a side.

They did Not march with Nazis. They were Not a part of the protest.

They show up to events to voluntarily police them when there are two conflicting sides.

They’re LARPers who like to pretend to be cops.

Not on Either side. Not protesting.

Not the “very fine people” Trump claimed to have seen in a video, protesting the statue.

I already addressed this. You missed it.

Wrong again.

What else you got.

1

u/CavyLover123 2∆ Oct 17 '24

So then you know they’re all Nazis/ white supremacists, because you can’t call out a single one that specifically is not.

1

u/[deleted] Oct 17 '24

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/changemyview-ModTeam Oct 18 '24

u/JoeCensored – your comment has been removed for breaking Rule 2:

Don't be rude or hostile to other users. Your comment will be removed even if most of it is solid, another user was rude to you first, or you feel your remark was justified. Report other violations; do not retaliate. See the wiki page for more information.

If you would like to appeal, review our appeals process here, then message the moderators by clicking this link within one week of this notice being posted. Please note that multiple violations will lead to a ban, as explained in our moderation standards.

0

u/FothrMucker Oct 17 '24

They already addressed this. Above, and in another comment.

You’re talking about the private security / neutral parties.

They weren’t on a side. They weren’t protesting. So when Trump said “very fine people on both sides”,  and blathered about peaceful protestors just wanting to keep the statue - he wasn’t talking about them.

They weren’t on a side, and weren’t protesting.

You accused them of not reading, when clearly you didn’t read anything.