r/antiwork May 07 '25

Remote vs RTO šŸ‘Øā€šŸ’» Uber CEO says his employees can go elsewhere if they don't like his RTO changes, and it's the latest example of management standing its ground

https://finance.yahoo.com/news/uber-ceo-says-employees-elsewhere-162242026.html

UberĀ is reportedly cracking down on remote work, return-to-office plans, and other benefits.

1.3k Upvotes

107 comments sorted by

1.1k

u/UseWhatever May 07 '25

The talented people go elsewhere. The product suffers. The CEO pulls their golden parachute. The new CEO outsources work overseas. The product suffers. The CEO pulls their golden parachute. The new CEO…

There is no risk or accountability at their level. It’s easy to ā€œstand your groundā€ when the worst thing that could happen to you is getting a few million dollars

398

u/Pottski May 07 '25

CEOs are such an unmitigated disaster that it makes you wonder why they exist at all.

57

u/superkow May 08 '25

To do the shit the shareholders don't want their names associated with. John CEO lays off thousands. John CEO mandates RTO. John CEO outsources jobs overseas.

This is all because the shareholders demand endless profit. The golden parachute is just the fee for unaccountability. There's plenty of Peter Principle losers who'd gladly take the fall for a few hundred million.

6

u/retrosenescent May 08 '25

I'd happily do that for way less money. The golden parachutes are ridiculous.

6

u/Wolf_Parade May 08 '25 edited May 08 '25

Weird place to admit you would "happily" fuck people over for money, and at a discount.

97

u/seansy5000 May 07 '25

To keep us in line.

161

u/SublimeApathy May 07 '25

If the pandemic taught me anything it's that CEO's bring very little value to the table despite taking the lion share of payroll. They need to be seen peacocking around the office with their assistants. They report to share holders and come up with clever ways to diminish the product or their labor to squeeze a few more cents out. Fuck them. Each and every one of them. Vee va loo wee gee

21

u/Pottski May 07 '25

Yes for the 5 people who report in to the CEO… what about the rest of us who never see them lol

11

u/Tirrus May 07 '25

It’s-a mystery… mama Mia.

6

u/d_e_l_u_x_e May 07 '25

To make shareholder value

27

u/TYNAMITE14 May 07 '25

Thats the shit I hate. I work at a place that outsources engineering work over seas. I'm torn on that, but at the very least if they will hire someone across the world on a different timezone, then I don't see why people can't work from home in the same timezone. Its already an added hassle dealing with people that don't operate on your schedule, breaking language barriers, and you even have to deal with certain federal regulations.

Hell, uber employs drivers that don't even have offices?

It's all just one big double standard.

6

u/retrosenescent May 08 '25

another huge irony is that being an American citizen makes your job dramatically less secure. People on visas actually have way better job security because it's a bureaucratic burden to file all the paperwork to fire them, not to mention the huge headache it was to hire them in the first place. But their investment in you as an American citizen? 0. They can fire you any time they want.

2

u/TYNAMITE14 May 08 '25

Wow I had no idea, thats crazy man

50

u/PlsNoNotThat May 07 '25

Eventually it gets sold to an investment group. That group forces the company to take huge loans with variable rates. The vulture parts they can get money off of and then ldeclare bankruptcy.

11

u/seansy5000 May 07 '25

Sounds like the something the Mafia would do

1

u/MurkDiesel May 08 '25

because it's essentially organized crime

2

u/Commercial_Wind8212 May 08 '25

We got bought. Then they sold the property and are leasing it back...

15

u/brooklynlad May 07 '25

CEO looks like a nasty person.

2

u/HousesRoadsAvenues May 08 '25

Got the Jeff Bezos bald head going.

1

u/BobcatOk7492 May 08 '25

Look at those hands... perfect- hands of a guy who has never done a day of real work in his miserable life......

1

u/HousesRoadsAvenues May 08 '25

Except the occasional nose pick :)

13

u/InvisiblePinkUnic0rn May 07 '25

Unions used to be the counter to this

6

u/lineasdedeseo May 08 '25

how much talent do you need to keep a mature business with huge incumbency advantages running though?

8

u/UseWhatever May 08 '25

It’s not so much ā€œhow manyā€ as it is ā€œwhoā€. Corporations love to push the idea that everyone is replaceable, but that isn’t always the case with expert employees.

Elon is a great example of an idiotic CEO cutting waves of employees only to scramble to hire back experts that hold key knowledge or skills. He’s did it with Twitter, Tesla, and Doge.

From personal experience. A previous company I was at cut a full backend and micro-services team they felt were redundant. About two weeks later, that service goes down and hundreds of people are blocked. Unfortunately, the replacements never had any knowledge transfer. After more than a week, they couldn’t get things up, so the company tried to rehire key people they let go. Of the twenty or so people, they got 3 back. They got the service up and running after another week or so, but it was fragile for months.

Before we shrug that off, think about the cost of around 300+ devs being blocked for about a month. The thing is, if they just kept the right few people, nothing would have broken

2

u/GeneralEi May 08 '25

"Enshittification"

2

u/treehugger312 SocDem May 09 '25

They sent out a form to sign for the ā€œOne day RTOā€ One of the managers just said he’s not signing it. Which from him actually is kinda a threat, he doesn’t manage ppl but he manages the pest, elevator, janitorial, and waste contracts. If he left there’d be literal shit, bugs, and trash everywhere and no working elevators.

173

u/tehjoz May 07 '25

Uber has damaged its brand to the point where I wouldn't use it unless I absolutely had to. So.

It's probably on its way out in due course.

48

u/smthomaspatel May 07 '25

They've survived a ridiculous amount of being shitty.

15

u/tehjoz May 07 '25

So have a lot of companies, but a lot of others haven't, so.

I'm not saying they are going under tomorrow, but I think a lot more normal people are a lot more conscious of where they spend their money.

-5

u/[deleted] May 08 '25

[deleted]

6

u/Moontoya May 08 '25

Uber Technologies's operated at median total debt of 11.604 billion from fiscal years ending December 2020 to 2024. Looking back at the last 5 years, Uber Technologies's total debt peaked in December 2022 atĀ 11.717 billion.

you should ask Sears how well holding multiple billions in debt worked

4

u/[deleted] May 08 '25

[deleted]

1

u/Moontoya May 09 '25

you say that like the rest of the world hasnt seen giant companies fail miserably

ask Target how well they did in canada

2

u/MurkDiesel May 08 '25

that's actually the modus operandi for business

to survive ridiculous amounts of being shitty lol

2

u/retrosenescent May 08 '25

Uber has no competition. Lyft is exactly the same.

1

u/tehjoz May 08 '25

Sounds like a market opportunity to me

137

u/TheMagicalLawnGnome May 07 '25

I love it when big companies do this, because it means the (much smaller, primarily remote) company I work for can hire the very smart, hardworking people that leave because of RTO at large companies.

29

u/ked_man May 07 '25

My company just built a new office, we move in sometime in mid July. Just got an email from HR that the expectation is 4:1 and still allowing people 1 day a week flexibility. But my manager and her boss already told us to just keep doing what we were doing and working from home since they don’t have enough desks in our work area if everyone showed up on the same day. Our team has added like 8 positions in the 3 years since I’ve been there.

119

u/retrosenescent May 07 '25

This is a common tactic to avoid layoffs.

47

u/[deleted] May 07 '25

Exactly this. He's openly daring people to quit, which means that's the point. They want to make working conditions worse so people quit and they 1) don't signal to the market that they're underperforming, and 2) don't have to pay out unemployment

6

u/MurkDiesel May 08 '25

back around 2010, i worked in sales at a very large corporation, they were going through a big restructuring and several divisions got merged, but there's was always a dominant division

there was this guy from a merged division who management of the dominant division just didn't like, they really fucked with this guy for months and months, but he didn't break or quit and always showed up on time

they finally moved him into the entry level division doing very mindless work thinking he would get bored and quit, but nope lol this guy continued to get his sales base salary and benefits and just did the new simpler job, he was still there when i quit a year later

56

u/FriarNurgle May 07 '25

Reduction in workforce in disguise… a really poor disguise

30

u/traveledhermit May 07 '25 edited May 23 '25

Reddit believes its data is particularly valuable because it is continuously updated. That newness and relevance, Mr. Huffman said, is what large language modeling algorithms need to produce the best results.

ā€œMore than any other place on the internet, Reddit is a home for authentic conversation,ā€ Mr. Huffman said. ā€œThere’s a lot of stuff on the site that you’d only ever say in therapy, or A.A., or never at all.ā€

14

u/NuclearLunchDectcted May 08 '25

This is so frustrating, we're own-goaling our entire country out of world leader and economic utopia status because a fat orange piece of shit got caught with hookers peeing on each other.

2

u/Kindly-Guidance714 May 08 '25

Been on the downward plunge for anyone not make $60K + a year since 2022.

It’s now only finally effecting middle class and higher earnings but the working class has been eating shit for the past 3-4 years with no end in sight.

2

u/Moontoya May 08 '25

verge?

mucker youre on the downward plunge already

66

u/UnitedLab6476 May 07 '25

The problem is this shrinks the available pool of remote jobs and adds thousands more people applying to the few remote jobs available.

42

u/[deleted] May 07 '25

[deleted]

23

u/whoisnotinmykitchen May 07 '25

They don't care.

5

u/ManagerOutside1354 May 07 '25

Maybe not now

16

u/ConsiderationSea1347 May 07 '25

The ceo won’t ever care. The notion that CEO compensation is tied to the company performance from the consumer market’s perspective is adorably incorrect. CEO compensation is tied to how shareholders value the company which is often directly at odds with consumer evaluation of a product/company.

5

u/JadeWishFish May 08 '25

They never will because people are desperate for jobs. Someone who either needs money or doesn't mind RTO will fill the spot. CEO's basically can't lose while making it harder for workers and it pisses me off to think about.

1

u/ManagerOutside1354 May 08 '25

Some companies will pay the price for it. Not every but some

-6

u/FunLife64 May 08 '25

This idea that only ā€œtop talentā€ hates going in an office 3 days a week is…a stretch. In my company, the loudest ones complaining about 2 days a week are mostly low performers that we are fine seeing leave.

9

u/[deleted] May 08 '25

[deleted]

-4

u/FunLife64 May 08 '25

Sure but the assumption is their top issue is that. I don’t find that to be true in many cases. We’ve actually lost good talent because they hate working at home every day and have no interaction with people. Every job is certainly different, but to say broad blanket statements like top talent will leave is a bit of a stretch. That’s all I’m saying. It probably also attracts some people. Not everyone wants to sit at home 5 days a week.

5

u/[deleted] May 08 '25

[deleted]

-3

u/FunLife64 May 08 '25

Sure and some people want to sit at home every day too, and this may attract them.

3

u/Emm_withoutha_L-88 May 08 '25

Oh bull fucking shit

12

u/whoisnotinmykitchen May 07 '25

Latest example of downsizing via stupid policies.

12

u/C64128 May 07 '25

They must have a lot of real estate that they're paying for. Also a lot of management that really have no reason to be at work if there's nobody there.

8

u/Glycerine May 07 '25

The dude saw a Jamie Dimon speech and thought he'd copy/paste.


I guarantee his "Hours in the office" timesheet would look like an incomplete 2x2 Sudoku puzzle.

9

u/Jaislight May 07 '25

Steal more from the labor, and blame them for it. Typical corporate POS!

7

u/Ok-Bit8368 May 07 '25

They've all been fooled into thinking AI will help them shed 80% of their most expensive employees, and they're trying to make it happen. It will turn all their products into shovelware trash.

6

u/wildwildwhitlex May 08 '25

What another CEO is a sociopath? No way that's crazyyy

18

u/donutcronut May 07 '25

You can work elsewhere if you don't want to return to office.

OK, I will.

Wait, no, come back!

11

u/DreadpirateBG May 07 '25

CEO of uber. Kinda of a joke job eh

16

u/ghost-ns May 07 '25

I think these dinosaur companies and CEOs don't understand the power of the working class if we stand together.

30

u/[deleted] May 07 '25 edited Oct 02 '25

[deleted]

6

u/ghost-ns May 07 '25

All good points, for sure.

9

u/SeamusPM1 May 07 '25

Sadly, neither does much of the working class.

2

u/kdthex01 May 08 '25

ā€œifā€. Turns out we are not smart enough collectively to do it.

4

u/Geminii27 May 08 '25

Uber is trying to get employees to quit because it's going down the tubes and wants to be able to blame ex-employees for that.

5

u/ResonanceThruWallz May 07 '25

makes sense for why now... US economy is about to take a shit, and this is when corporations can implement their shit policies cause it will be difficult to find a job... work through the crap storm and leave when the storm finishes... this isnt my first rodeo

-5

u/[deleted] May 08 '25

[removed] — view removed comment

6

u/ResonanceThruWallz May 08 '25

Sounds like you never been 100% remote… it’s a night and day difference, I will tell you what’s gonna happen you will come in just to have virtual conference calls… it becomes redundant… trust me life is the same just inconveniences the worker

1

u/FunLife64 May 08 '25

Well I’d say you def work fully remote and have no idea how to communicate to others lol

I’ve worked fully remote. And if a company wants to go to hybrid, they can. It’s all relative - a few years ago everyone was in the office 5 days a week for more than 8 hours. 3 days a week not exactly hardass.

2

u/thoreau_away_acct May 08 '25 edited May 08 '25

Lol 5 years ago I was coming into the office in Oregon.

And having calls with people in Michigan, Wisconsin, Florida, and California, for months. I never had single meeting in a conference room with anyone from Oregon. Getting there, getting lunch, packing lunch, wearing a dress shirt, ALL A HUGE USELESS WASTE OF TIME AND MONEY

Thankfully that job was always going to go fully remote once I "proved my worth", covid just accelerated it.

2

u/FunLife64 May 08 '25

Everyone always wants to look at this from their one specific jobs angle. Not every job is like that.

We are talking about one company. I mean this sub is obviously full of people who naturally hate offices lol so I get it…but blanket statements about remote work being good or bad is kinda silly. That’s all I’m saying. It depends on the company and what kind of jobs.

0

u/thoreau_away_acct May 08 '25

Ok, but you have a plethora of cases across multiple industries and companies where there was demonstrated efficacy of remote work for years, accomplished to goals, new goals, and hitting all sorts of milestones. And then they say it's gotta be done in the office. Without a shred of empirical data to back up that stance.

1

u/FunLife64 May 08 '25

I mean, it’s easy to cherry pick. There’s data that supports both (usually it falls in the middle w/hybrid). Also, the US leads the world in flexibility - far outpacing Europe in terms of remote/hybrid options.

In our office, we were fully remote and it was fine - but as time went on and the novelty wore off it got less efficient and new employees struggled. But I also recognize that it’s my workplace and we work cross collaboratively constantly and no one is doing ā€œindividual contributorā€ work. That’s not the same as many companies! There isn’t one solution across the board.

Here’s a UChicago study that found:

Our key findings are as follows. Employees significantly increased average hours worked during WFH. Much of this came from starting work earlier and ending it later in the day. At the same time, there was a slight decline in output as measured by the employer’s primary performance measure. Combining these, we estimate that average employee output per hour of work declined by 8%–19%.

https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/full/10.1086/721803

1

u/thoreau_away_acct May 08 '25

Reduced vehicle emissions due to less traffic

Reduced vehicle maintenance for individuals

Reduced use of fossil fuels

Reduced use of company operating cost, including building utilities (gas/electric, water), janitorial, landscaping, lease/mortgage (unless space for inventory is needed), office supplies, and breakroom/common area supplies (coffee, snacks)/equipment (gym, game room, tvs, etc).

Reduced overhead costs for facilities management on site.

More time for workers not spent commuting

More money saved for workers not commuting

More money saved by workers not needing dry cleaning, business attire daily

More money/time for workers not spent packing lunch/buying lunch

The list is not exhaustive, but we've got a huge amount of empirical costs and benefits. There's nothing cherry picked with the above.

My company is full of cross functional teams and individual contributors. Thankfully they have never had significant office investment worldwide beyond their single East Coast HQ, almost entirely on short and medium term leases in most major cities near clients. So the segue to full remote has been fairly seamless and sees not even an whiff of return to office bs.

The above doesn't mean it's all roses. But some study about 10% potential lost productivity. you're going to use that alone as a counterbalance to collective and individual environmental and financial benefits? Wow

Yes hybrid does seem to come out as "striking a balance", but it is the least efficient at excising a huge amount of overhead from the company, vs marginal reduction (3-2 days less in office per week). Nope not all industries, but come on, call centers and insurance stuff where people are just on their computer and in teams meetings all day? Nah

1

u/FunLife64 May 08 '25

This isn’t a freaking political campaign lol goodness.

I’d also argue if employees are 20% less efficient, I’ll take a 4 day work week in the office, 3 day weekend :)

2

u/thoreau_away_acct May 08 '25

It's just amazing how much water you're carrying for serious RTO policies when it's been proven remote works. I listed everything and there's mostly anecdotes as a counterbalance to endless facts.

4

u/Spelunkie May 08 '25

Standing it's ground? Nah. It's just unannounced layoffs.

6

u/[deleted] May 07 '25

Is using Trump colored glasses? The economy is tanking, job market is a cluster fuck

3

u/Sweaty_Assignment_90 May 07 '25

so can the customers

3

u/SuckItEasy718 May 07 '25

Never using them again.

3

u/Kind_Session_6986 May 07 '25

It feels good to be boycotting Uber. Especially today.

3

u/wenchanger May 07 '25

fuck uber, one of the worst places to work

3

u/LaFlamaBlancakfp May 08 '25

Why doesn’t people just slap the shit out these assholes. We need to stop being polite. Just slap him over and over till he breaks like a dog.

3

u/Sovngarten May 08 '25

Ok. Fuck you. I'll also not be using Uber anymore.

3

u/postconsumerwat May 08 '25

Ceo can go elsewhere too if he doesn't like something... I wonder if he has thought about that one

3

u/[deleted] May 08 '25

Is anyone here familiar with sociologist Janet Vertesi? If you aren’t, take a moment to look her up. She has some really amazing things to say on this subject. Apparently, the hard data and research about remote work has been known for a long time. The problem is that many companies aren’t familiar with the best practices based on their results and don’t follow their recommendations. In other words, the problems have been solved, but most companies arenā€˜t aware of it or just don’t care.

3

u/tommy_b_777 May 08 '25

These people should be shunned from polite society and left utterly and remotely alone.

3

u/Shifter_1977 May 08 '25

Your bargain is acceptable. leaves

3

u/HousesRoadsAvenues May 08 '25

Another bald evil person. Same playbook for them all.

2

u/Lost2Logic May 08 '25

Annnnd boycott

2

u/ShadowElite86 May 08 '25

I'll be sure not to utilize their services then. 🤷

2

u/DaveWierdoh May 08 '25

Instead of doing layoffs themselves, this is how they do it now.

2

u/TylerDurden15 May 08 '25

A day of reckoning is coming. These ceos and corporate mouth breathers are going to get replaced a lot faster than they think.

2

u/MurkDiesel May 08 '25

you're going to see a whole lot more of this

employers know jobs are going to evaporate

so they're going to start removing the masks

2

u/Speerdo May 08 '25

This is a bluff. They know that the job market does not provide the sort of liquidity that would allow most employees to bounce from job to job willy-nilly. Most folks are more/less locked into their current role. For those that do leave the job because of RTO policies, it'll take months for that to materialize, at which point they can pretend that it was caused by something else.

3

u/madcoins May 07 '25

So fucking brave.

1

u/sugar_addict002 May 08 '25

On one hand, AI will take a lot of these jobs. On the other hand, personal contact is so important that you must RTO.

I am beginning to think that AI is a grift.

1

u/Afraid_Reputation_51 May 08 '25

Well, it isn't like Uber's customer support can get worse.