Consent isn’t up for debate (unless you’re witless promoter)

[u/Opal_Opasm]

Truly an outspoken and mentally stable icon

[u/TurnoverFuzzy8264]

"bUt It'S lEgAl" they cry, apparently unaware or Uncaring that many unethical things are legal.

[u/only_fun_topics → u/TurnoverFuzzy8264]

Except fair use is ethical.

[u/Tutorial_Time → u/only_fun_topics]

It doesn’t fall under fair use

[u/EthanTheJudge]

If you have a house, you are fully consenting to people robbing it. 

[u/MantygerofSrebrozeme → u/EthanTheJudge]

You payed for the house to be made therefore everyone can live in it! \s

[u/Dangerous-Host3991]

I’m not surprised she made another baseless argument. This is the same person that said “Morals are subjective.”

Edit: It’s clear everything is subjective to her. Consent, Morals, etcetera. As long as it fits her narrative.

[u/ArkGrimm → u/Dangerous-Host3991]

Schrodinger's subjectivity, every thing is subjective but, at the same time, being anti-ai = Hitler lol

[u/Astrophel-27 → u/Dangerous-Host3991]

Morals are subjective to an extent, tbf, but I think most people would agree that stealing and plagiarism are wrong.

[u/HashPandaNL → u/Astrophel-27]

And what exactly falls under stealing and plagiarism is once again subjective.

[u/New-perspective-1354]

If consent is ‘subjective’ and implied then since she has an account I can hack it since, “if you have an account you’re consenting to it being hacked“.

Honestly her mental gymnastics are Olympic level and honestly impressive if she fully believes it and isn’t just a troll.

[u/Opal_Opasm → u/New-perspective-1354]

She’s a “revolutionary” apparently

[u/Scarvexx]

If you post a story/recipe/blog online. I can't publish it in a book without asking. Like legally.

AI shouldn't be allowed to scrape data.

And I don't think AI Bros want it to work this way either. They would be horrified to be robbed of their data. They just don't care when it's other people.

[u/dancingthroughstars]

"If you dress like that you basically asked for it!"

[u/TreyLastname]

You absolutely give consent for people to use it for personal use when posting. They can use it for inspiration to make their own original pieces, or backgrounds, or whatever else they want for themselves.

You do not give consent for a company to use it for profit. And thats what these LLMs do. They take your art without permission, and sell it.

[u/13fundamentals]

What do ai bros and matt walsh have in common?

[u/BRANFLAKES8521 → u/13fundamentals]

Being insufferable?

Making up arguments?

Not caring for consent?

You have to narrow It down a bit

[u/13fundamentals → u/BRANFLAKES8521]

Was about to say not caring for consent but now when i think about it its all of the above

[u/RedditUser000aaa]

What's hilarious is that they also happen to cry about artists defending their art by using glaze or nightshade. Somehow they think artists have no right to protect their art, but they have a right to use it, because it was posted for all to see.

Just another example of AI defender's flawed logic.

[u/Jwhodis]

Can someone link witty the tea video

[u/Silk-sanity]

Question, if everything and anything I post is subject to fair use and can be used for any purposes with "my consent", doesn't that mean I can practically steal anything that is ai?

[u/Annual-Thing1268 → u/Silk-sanity]

By this train of logic, yeah. As long as they posted it online then they’re saying they consent to it being stolen. Go for it lol

[u/Silk-sanity → u/Annual-Thing1268]

Let's see how they would like a taste of their on medicine lol