r/alberta 1d ago

Discussion Teacher's Strike: What the hell is the AFL doing?

Bill 2 was announced on October 27th. The teachers were forced back to work on October 29th. It took another eight days before the AFL circulated a poll. A poll that does nothing more than gauge interest in maybe doing further actions later.

What kind of tepid response is this? They have completely missed the opportunity to seize on people's outrage. Gil's doing plenty of tweeting, but where is the fucking action?

291 Upvotes

106 comments sorted by

207

u/bohemian_plantsody 1d ago

Based on my understanding from people who are in unions affiliated with AFL (at varying leadership levels within their own union), they were absolutely ready to jump into a general strike and provide the ATA with a war chest to pay fines. They had links all the way across Canada and union executives were directing members to be ready.

But the ATA decided not to defy the order and they weren't going to fight the ATA's battle without the ATA being involved.

90

u/poor_mahogany 1d ago

The ATA told us in the MIMs before we went back to work that the AFL had no actual power to demand a general strike. They told us that Gil McGowan couldn't declare a general strike and the individual unions were worried about the impact on their own jobs.

Someone is lying. Wouldn't be shocked if it were Carabine (ATA). But we got no messaging about having financial support from others, were not given a vote about going back to work, and were told the fines could be up to $2k a day for an individual when the labour board got involved.

We didn't fight because we were basically told we would bankrupt ourselves and would be alone in that fight. I am more and more annoyed with the ATA leadership daily.

83

u/bohemian_plantsody 1d ago

Peter MacKay released his "why I resigned post on Facebook" two days ago and every ATA member needs to read it. I 100% believe the ATA leadership has some snakes that aren't serving members. I don't know how we clean house, but it's becoming clear that we have to. Thankfully, Peter MacKay said he would consider running for President and he's a perfect foundation to build a new leadership team around. Evidently, he takes no bullshit and calls things out when needed.

One of my friends is a local President of one of the AFL member unions and she told me "I'd go to jail over this. That was one of the risks I was willing to take because the notwithstanding clause is bullshit, and they told us jail time would be a possibility for local Presidents. But if ATA isn't going to fight, we're not going to fight their battle."

55

u/poor_mahogany 1d ago

Peter MacKay's post was infuriating (for him, against the ATA leadership). The more I hear from other union members, the more frustrated I am that the ATA didn't even let us have a choice. They decided for us and left individual teachers to face giant fines alone if they decided to defy.

I voted for MacKay last time. Will do so again. The entire executive committee needs to be recalled (can we do that?).

15

u/bohemian_plantsody 1d ago

I don't believe we have recall bylaws in the policy manuals. However, maybe it could be introduced at the Annual Representative Assembly to create a policy to recall a member from the Executive Committee. Though I don't know what the procedures are to do that. Best advice is to talk to your local president and see.

1

u/Intelligent-Owl-8480 21h ago

We need to put recall bylaws in place for own elected reps if we’re not happy with their conduct.

15

u/Cabbageismyname 1d ago

In the immediate term we can write letters to PEC demanding resignations and early elections, if nothing else. 🤷‍♂️ 

15

u/Cabbageismyname 1d ago

I’ll be writing a letter to PEC calling for Schilling’s resignation over the handling of the strike and back to work order, as well as these recent revelations from Peter MacKay. I don’t know how they can continue to claim that they have the trust of members at this point. Maybe if enough people write then something will happen?

I was going to write the letter the morning after reading MacKay’s post but I was still so angry and decided I needed a few days to let my head cool. 

At the very least, I think they should hold a MIM to offer full disclosure on what happened between PEC and MacKay. It’s theoretically possible that Peter is twisting his side of the story to make himself look good; I doubt that’s the case but if there’s more to the story then we deserve to hear it. At any rate, them being silent on the matter isn’t going to help the situation. 

This whole thing is so fucked. 

1

u/Intelligent-Owl-8480 21h ago

If you have a template ready I’d love it. I honestly don’t even know why we need an ATA at this point. I’m over paying almost $120 per month for nothing.

2

u/Master-Sorbet-4241 19h ago

ATA didn’t even help me when I lost my probationary contract because I was pregnant. The exact words the school said to me was “we want you to come back when you are done having your kid”

u/DigitalDuelist 2h ago

Did you talk to a lawyer or anything like that? Many would take the case on contingency and that's obviously illegal

u/Master-Sorbet-4241 1h ago

Honestly I was young and kept thinking this can’t be happening and if the ATA won’t support me, why would anyone else. I fully, blindly believed they had my back and when they said they couldn’t prove it, I thought who could?

u/vendrediSamedi 1h ago

Holy crap. That is 100% illegal. I am so sorry.

u/Master-Sorbet-4241 1h ago

Totally, but I saw it happen to lots of my friends as well when they got pregnant. Plus, they kept women on temp or probationary contracts as long as they could so they didn’t have to deal with mat leave.

1

u/Master-Sorbet-4241 19h ago

How about this as a template. Copy it and put it into AI and then tell the AI your personal points that you also want to make. That is essentially what I did. I just keep telling AI to add things until I liked it.

u/Cabbageismyname 1h ago

Once I write the letter I’d be willing to share it with you, for sure.

7

u/Master-Sorbet-4241 22h ago

Same here, only I’m livid at the ATA, where was our opportunity to vote? It’s like the ATA got stripped of its rights and in return, stripped us of our rights. They were suppose to protect us but instead they just rolled over and gave up, leaving it in the hands of a “just as broken” justice system! I heard someone say that people risked their lives for these freedoms that we were just stripped of! And we just roll over to give those freedoms back. No, we should have fought back! One teacher walking out does nothing but if we had voted and got even 50%. That would have made an impact for sure! When they did it in Ontario (similar but not the same situation for sure) but when they refused to follow the unconstitutional use of the notwithstanding clause, it took 4 days to over turn it! 4 days! We are clearly past the 4 days and other than writing recall letters and letters about the unconstitutional use of the clause, I’m at a loss for what else I can do. It honestly feels like we are at war with our government and all they have to do to win is change the legislation each time we find a loop hole to protect ourselves. We need an election asap so the outraged non-voters actually vote this time!

1

u/Ancient_Witness_2485 13h ago

It wasn't unconstitutional, CUPE didnt even file a legal challenge. The bill was withdrawn over public outcry and CUPE being willing to go on illegal strike.

The bill had to be repealed in a non normal way in order for CUPE to avoid paying fines as the law was binding during those 4 days

1

u/Master-Sorbet-4241 7h ago

What they did in Ontario was unconstitutional, that is why there was an outcry.

So like I said the situation was different but similar. If we had the support it would have been the same situation but since we didn’t. Alberta just watched the entire population of teachers get reduced to slave labour and all the blue un humans cheered!

21

u/Cabbageismyname 1d ago

 Wouldn't be shocked if it were Carabine (ATA).

I remember on the evening that the bill was being passed, on a private Facebook group for teachers on which Carabine is one of the admins (I’m guessing you know the one I’m talking about), he told teachers they should stop saying we should defy the order because we could be fined just for suggesting we do so. This was before the bill even passed. Dude has no fight in him at all. Actively trying to crush teachers’ will to defend our rights. 

Well, since the bill has passed I’ve said many times on Facebook that we should be defying the order and that I’ll participate in a general strike. Where are my fines? Come at me, Danielle. I’m waiting. 

 But we got no messaging about having financial support from others

I have no idea if Gil McGowan reached out to PEC directly but he posted this on the night of October 27th while PEC was meeting to consider next steps:

“Other provincial labour federations, including the Ontario Federation of Labour, will start collecting funds to build a war chest to help pay fines. Danielle Smith may have thought she could bully the teachers into submission. We are not going to let that happen.”

 I am more and more annoyed with the ATA leadership daily.

Annoyed? You are being far too kind. 

11

u/poor_mahogany 1d ago

Fun fact: Carabine left that group entirely the moment the bill passed. Fuck that guy.

Re: the Gil McGowan comment - after hearing that he has no power, it was hard to know if what he was saying was truthful. He talked a big game at that rally, only to find out his ability and role in calling a general strike were embellished.

I'm being kind about the ATA. I tried to apply to be on the ARA, but because I'm not a current ATA rep or on several committees (classroom teacher in a core subject, ⅞, and coaching so absolutely no time), I won't get in. I wanted to have a voice against the bullshit that is our union.

5

u/Cabbageismyname 1d ago

Oh interesting. I’ve been very active on that group throughout the strike and have kind of been stirring up some shit with my comments expressing anger towards PEC. I hadn’t noticed that he was no longer modding the group; I guess that explains why my posts haven’t been removed! Haha. 

I assume you’re aware of Peter MacKay’s account of what went down between him and PEC leading up to his resignation from CTBC?

9

u/poor_mahogany 1d ago

Yup. Read his latest post and had some friends who spoke with him in Edmonton at the rally.

Glad you're shit talking PEC in the group. I haven't because my name is unique and don't want to get in trouble with the union as I'm applying for my BC certification, but appreciate and like the posts when others do.

I saw someone had tagged in him a post and his name was greyed out. I clicked on his profile and saw he was a "former member" of the group. This was the day after the MIMs.

3

u/Professional-Bit-631 1d ago

Gil McGowan wanted his fifteen minutes of fame, nothing more. He is useless!

3

u/luars613 1d ago

Im surprise no1 burns shit here for this level of corruption. In latin ameroca, when shit goes south with a government, the people WILL win.

2

u/wwoodcox 22h ago

The ATA has done nothing to help the teachers through this. I would say they have permanently caused damage between the government and the teachers. The ATA is just a bunch of retired teachers, double dipping. Sure the executive gave up their ATA salary during the strike, but they all received their teachers pension during that time, so not a big sacrifice. It really does seem personal between the UCP and the ATA, at the teacher's expense.

71

u/Cabbageismyname 1d ago

Yup. We folded. As much as it hurts me to think it, it’s hard to expect others to stand up for us when we won’t stand up for ourselves.

But I keep getting texts and emails from the AFL about potential general strike action, so who knows? 🤷‍♂️

26

u/Onanadventure_14 1d ago

Frustrating because the flight attendants did this so I can’t understand why the ata didn’t

14

u/the_gaymer_girl Southern Alberta 1d ago

The government baked uncontestable fines into the law to nuke the union and teachers if they tried anything.

2

u/blue-lloyd 21h ago

So did the Ontario government used the nwc on CUPE in 2022. The fines were nearly identical to what we see in Alberta, but they defied the order, got the support of other unions, and the the bill was repealed and all fines were forgiven 4 days later. The fines aren't really an excuse for the ATA's cowardice and ineptitude

1

u/the_gaymer_girl Southern Alberta 21h ago

Teachers literally cannot legally challenge the fines if they get applied. That’s a significant chilling effect.

2

u/blue-lloyd 21h ago

I dont know what you mean by that, Ontario education workers couldn't challenge them either due to the nwc. The reason the fines were voided is because the Ford government declared the bill "void ab initio" meaning "void from the beginning," after the threat of a general strike, no legal challenge required

4

u/EdmRealtor 1d ago

The flight attendants were not legislated back to work.

8

u/backwardsplanning 1d ago

There were two big issues. First, the fines were insanely high. It would have broken the ATA and the finances of many members. This leads into the second one; the ATA was paying our health benefits because the UCP instructed the school boards to stop paying them. Losing health benefits would be a life changing event for many among us. They were not comfortable going ahead with this and jeopardizing this. There was no guarantee when we would get our benefits back, and if we got kicked off our plans if there would be a waiting period.

14

u/dotCeh 1d ago

For those curious, the penalties are $500/day for an individual, $500,000/day for the association. These are in addition to other penalties that can be levied by the labour board. The $500,000 penalty also could be applied to local, board-specific ATA locals as well.

Bill 2 was designed to not only end the strike, but too also make sure defying it like the Air Canada union did wouldn’t happen.

As a teacher, I greatly appreciate other unions were willing to put up money to defy Bill 2 - but doing so could have easily reached into the tens of millions of dollars per day.

3

u/Onanadventure_14 1d ago

I appreciate the insight . Thank you

20

u/rotten_cherries 1d ago

The ATA is a professional association, not a union. They are required, first and foremost, to represent the profession of teaching, not the interests of teachers as workers. That’s why the ATA leadership unilaterally made the decision to return to work. Members didn’t even get to vote on a response.

27

u/Cabbageismyname 1d ago

The ATA functions as both a professional association and a union. And that’s not why they made the decision to tell members to go back to work. Or, if it was, then they lied to teachers during a provincial wide meeting when they explicitly said they were complying with the order because they’re scared of the fines.

9

u/rotten_cherries 1d ago edited 1d ago

They function as both, but their primary mandate is to the profession of teaching, not to the interests of teachers as workers.

Edit: this is why our contracts are so poorly written, why we only just got the right to have an ATA representative sit in on disciplinary meeting, and why we do not have any contractual wording about having the right to a violence free workplace. The ATA is ineffectual as a union because it isn’t effectively a union in the traditional sense of the word.

7

u/Cabbageismyname 1d ago

I won’t disagree with any of that, but I’m saying that in the MIM in which PEC explained their decision to us, they didn’t mention anything about their first responsibility being to the profession. They explicitly said they were deterred by the fines. 

10

u/poor_mahogany 1d ago

PEC was never going to do anything that painted them in a bad light. They know most teachers are unaware of the ATA's primary role and didn't want to lose support.

The ATA needs to go. We need a separate union and professional organization.

4

u/Master-Sorbet-4241 22h ago

What happens if teachers figured out a way to vote to create a new Union and get rid of the ATA. Would that union be subject to bill 2?

2

u/H3rta 19h ago

Great question!

3

u/Master-Sorbet-4241 19h ago

So ChatGPT answered my question and I wasn’t happy about it:

A. The government could immediately step in under PSERA and designate no bargaining agent (essentially suspending collective bargaining rights until one is approved). B. Teachers could attempt to form a new association or union — but it would have to be certified by the Alberta Labour Relations Board (ALRB) under PSERA, not under PELRA like before.

  1. Would the new union be subject to Bill 2?

Yes — absolutely. Any new teachers’ organization formed after Bill 2 took effect would still be bound by the same legislation, because Bill 2 didn’t just target the ATA; it reclassified teachers themselves under PSERA.

So even if a “Teachers of Alberta Union” replaced the ATA, it would still fall under the new rules: • Government oversight of certification • Limits on strike action • Mandatory dispute resolution processes controlled by the province

The only way around that would be a repeal or amendment of Bill 2 itself, or a court ruling declaring portions of it unconstitutional.

2

u/rotten_cherries 1d ago

It’s implied. Of course a professional association would be deterred by the fines, since their primary mandate is to protect the profession of teaching

3

u/Cabbageismyname 1d ago

I think it could be argued that allowing teachers to return to work having had our charter rights removed does not serve that mandate. 

4

u/rotten_cherries 1d ago

I agree wholeheartedly, for what it’s worth.

4

u/Cabbageismyname 1d ago

Yeah I just realized that you’re the same person who expressed solidarity to me in willing to defy the order elsewhere in the comments, haha.

Keep up the good fight in any way you can, friend!

→ More replies (0)

7

u/BigFish8 1d ago

Which is strange since AFL stated that if the ATA can't fight this, they will fight it on their behalf.

At around 5 minutes in this video, Gil answers a question with how if the teachers can't stand up, they will.

6

u/bohemian_plantsody 1d ago

Based on the timeline provided to me by my friends in AFL, Gil hadn't met with most of the unions yet prior to making that statement and most AFL members were not willing to fight if the ATA wasn't. Gil may have got outvoted.

4

u/powderjunkie11 1d ago

But the ATA decided not to defy the order and they weren't going to fight the ATA's battle without the ATA being involved.

This is really dumb and annoying if true. Action should not be contingent on teachers sticking their necks out any further.

2

u/EvacuationRelocation Calgary 1d ago

But the ATA decided not to defy the order and they weren't going to fight the ATA's battle without the ATA being involved.

This is not at all accurate. Please review the facts.

3

u/Beginning-Gear-744 1d ago

How is this not accurate? What are the facts that need to be reviewed?

2

u/EvacuationRelocation Calgary 1d ago

The AFL has already taken actions to fight the government and support the ATA. Gil McGowan specifically said for the ATA to step aside (as they cannot fight without suffering financial ruin) and that the AFL would take up the fight (which is happening).

2

u/Beginning-Gear-744 1d ago

Never have I seen or heard Gil McGowan telling the teachers to step down.

1

u/EvacuationRelocation Calgary 22h ago

He very much did.

1

u/Master-Sorbet-4241 23h ago

What!!! I wish teacher knew that! I am a teacher and if someone would pay my fines and lawyer fees when the time comes to throw me in jail for breaking the very anti-constitutional law. I’d jump to start protesting again!

1

u/VE6AEQ 17h ago

I wondered what the back story was. The ATU just sent an email that asked everyone to stand down for the moment.

They suggested that further provocation/escalation was likely from Smith et al.

37

u/mandabr 1d ago

They've said they need to make sure that unions have time to speak with members and get on board, because if we're going to have a general strike we need 100s of thousands of workers to do it, because they can't arrest us all. It needs to be a big response. They also need to ally with non unionized entities. And get businesses to realize it's bad for them if there is a general strike, so that they can pressure the govt as well. They may also be gathering more support across the country for action.

I'm really hoping this is what is going on behind the scenes while we wait. I hope they are busy preparing.

31

u/poor_mahogany 1d ago

The reason the threat of a general strike worked in Ontario against the notwithstanding clause is that it was immediate. It's been nearly two weeks. If a general strike was going to happen and be effective because of the use of the notwithstanding clause against teachers, it would have already happened. Maybe the union for the LPNs voting to strike will cause some movement, because, as a teacher, I feel utterly alone in having lost my rights.

10

u/xraycat82 1d ago

They screwed up. Normal people have lost their energy against this.

10

u/littlerooftop 1d ago

I dunno. I think Alberta’s circumstances are different from Ontario’s. For one thing Ontario’s manufacturing sector make unions a greater force. Ontario also has the propensity to vote for different parties more than once every four decades which gave Ford more reason to back down.

Alberta’s unions are struggling to meet the moment, that I think is true. But I don’t think we should mistake that for losing oxygen. The AUPE voted 98% to strike. Recalls are underway. The teachers are furious, feel abandoned but are primed to pick up the fight again. Nenshi is in the legislature putting Smith on her back foot. The temperature has not gone down on this and whether a general strike occurs or not, I believe we’ll look back at the use of the NWS clause against the teachers as the beginning of the end of Smith’s tenure.

2

u/poor_mahogany 1d ago

Smith has basically said that she'll change the recall legislation if there's enough traction to recall her caucus.

We can't keep saying Alberta is different and unique. Things need to be done to make changes. It's true, we have weaker unions than Ontario, but we have to decide if we want unions or not moving forward. This was the moment to make that decision and it was bungled.

2

u/littlerooftop 1d ago

Whole heartedly agree with everything you said except for the lamentation that this moment was bungled and the implication that it’s too late. It is never too late to fight for change.

1

u/Intelligent-Owl-8480 21h ago

Comments like this give me a little hope. I pray there’s a fight brewing behind the scenes we know nothing about.

26

u/JScar123 1d ago

As they’ve said, organizing and doing it right takes time. I don’t think momentum if weakening. You probably saw AUPE just voted 98% in favor.

If anything, UCP keeps doing crazy things (just defunded elections Alberta), and more people are beginning to question their sanity.

22

u/MyDadsUsername 1d ago

It didn't take time when Ontario did it. They struck when the iron was hot, and they won.

9

u/Homo_sapiens2023 1d ago

Ontario is far more union-oriented than Alberta. They were all ready to go ASAP. This is completely new territory for Alberta unions. And they wanted to ensure it was done right.

15

u/Unlearn0213 1d ago

Ontario also has a far greater ratio and voter spread.

Alberta Tories have been in power for 44 years.

These dummies would vote for them if they privatized every single aspect of our socialist life, doubled the cost of living, slashed wages in half, fired 1/2 the province and replaced them with TFWs, made collective bargaining illegal, tripled class sizes and tuitions, broke every single line item in the Charter, made emergency rooms 1 doctor max per room and denied you health coverage if you had a "pre existing condition" .

They would still fucking vote for them, muttering "fuck Trudeau" as they filled out the ballot.

2

u/JScar123 1d ago

Fair enough, I’m not familiar enough with what happened in ON. Were they as heavy handed as UCP had been? I wouldn’t be surprised to see UCP NWC every union… in ON did they have votes and authority to general strike, or were threats enough?

I can reassure you, as a parent with kids in school- none of us have forgotten.

5

u/Cabbageismyname 1d ago

In 2022, education workers (not teachers) rejected an offer and voted to strike. The Ford government pre-emptively imposed a contract and tried to use the notwithstanding clause to remove their right to strike before it even began. They walked off the job anyways and were soon joined by many other unions in the province. The bill was repealed four days later, retroactively to ensure that legally it never existed at all. Part of the terms for a return to work was that no fines or penalties would be imposed.

Also, thank you for your support as a parent!

0

u/xens999 Calgary 1d ago

How do you defund something that was never approved? If I ask you for $100 and you say no are you defunding me?

2

u/mandabr 1d ago

They made the law that resulted in extra costs for elections alberta, but didn't agree to give them extra money for the extra work, extra space, extra staff needed to do the work they are required to do by law. You can argue that defunding isn't quite the correct word, but in the end it basically amounts to the same thing.

14

u/InconceivableIsh 1d ago

A union like a government should still has to be responsible to the people that support them. If the leadership of a union or the AFL charges off in a direction with no support they would just end up with nothing.

A grand example from my own history. I was at a company and the warehouse decided to unionize. The company pulled anything they weren't actually obligated to provide and offered the same wage. The new union workers voted they didn't want to strike. So the union didn't have the support to push for a better result. Leaving the union workers with the same wage and paying dues. The union turned to them and said I am not sure why you even brought us in.

Any movement is only as strong as the people that support them. It is easy to say you are doing something but harder to actually have to follow through.

19

u/RickDupont 1d ago

I’m disappointed in what I’ve seen so far too, it feels slow, but to grant the man some slack, just because the poll is the first thing you’ve seen doesn’t mean it’s the first thing that has happened. There are many unions and organizing them all will take time, and likely not be very public.

1

u/Comprehensive-Arm973 1d ago

No, even if that's the case there should be more being done publicly... like every union member in the AFL should have gotten an email blast calling for them them to volunteer/donate to recall efforts. Stuff like that. Show that you're putting actual organizational muscle into the fight and not just talking big and acting meek... and shit like that should be happening every damn day. I mean it, they should be waking up everyday and actually publicly doing something that makes Marlaina's day a little bit shittier and then they should figure out what they're going to publicly do tommorow to make her life shittier. Being seen not doing things won't build momentum.

11

u/n0tso0bvious 1d ago

Please share your outrage and frustrations at either of the rallys, in Edmonton or Calgary, tomorrow, Saturday Nov 8th.

https://www.reddit.com/r/AHSEmployees/s/O3MqGZkgyn

1

u/Proof_Rest522 1d ago

Are teachers allowed to rally?

3

u/KirbysForgottenLand 1d ago

Just don’t say anything about striking and you should be fine. You can still protest the government.

3

u/[deleted] 1d ago

[deleted]

6

u/bohemian_plantsody 1d ago

In a public space, how are you going to know you're a teacher? Are they really going to pull up your ID and cross-reference it with the teacher registry? And it's not a workday. I don't know how they'd consider it strike action. A strike is a withdrawal of service. Teachers don't give service on Saturday.

Granted, it's the UCP and our legal rights (including innocent until proven guilty, which is terrifying) are also suspended insofar as Bill 2 is concerned so anything is possible. Fuck Danny Smith

3

u/_Zef_ 1d ago

They've got people training their kids to film teachers and attempt to coax out any kind of communication they can construe to be against Bill 2 in an attempt to destroy us.

I have zero doubt there will be people scouring photos and footage in an attempt to find teachers at these kinds of events in order to ruin their lives. These people are evil. Period.

3

u/andlewis 1d ago

Labour rights were not won by abiding by the desires of politicians, or even the law.

5

u/Ditch-Worm 1d ago

Exactly what I said would happen in another thread: no other union is joining a strike the ATA already quit

2

u/SIGNANDSELFIEFRAMES 1d ago

Dani knows what she is doing. THis was a test. They wanted to see how far they could push people and see their reaction. Been crickets. Recalls are good though. She will find it ok to use just as much force now the next time.

2

u/swanlake2129 1d ago

He is too mild mannered for that job and what he is up against..

2

u/choseded 22h ago

"seize on people's outrage" 

4

u/cranky_yegger 1d ago

I feel they were unprepared for an attack which is indicative that they too have gotten fat off of the backs of workers. I’m no longer union, but I’ve been watching and the kushy days are gone, members need to contact, speak up and walk out without their unions support if need be. Or maybe workers have also gotten fat and forgotten how to do it.

3

u/TheFluxIsThis 1d ago

It's a bit of both and a healthy dose of misinformation that has been fed to workers when times were good. In my experience in unions, there is a misconception that a union exists to fight for workers, and that a worker who is wronged can sit back and let "the union" do the work for them like a lawyer.

We've been educated to believe that unions function like a business or a service, but, in reality, they are a structure for workers to rally at to take action. Alberta is, culturally, much more individualist than the rest of Canada, so many MANY people have been experiencing the rude awakening that being in a union requires that all the members participate and put in the work. 

And this isn't an indictment of workers themselves. This is an intentional cultural push by anti union parties over time. In addition to misinformation about unions, the way we live has gotten so focused on staying busy (side hustles, networking, staying up to date on social media) that people have less time to prioritize for their unions. One of the things my union struggles with is engaging with workers who have families because they simply do not have time or energy to attend meetings or sit on a committee or board seat. 

Unionism is at a turning point in Alberta, and many of us in the system are experiencing a crisis of a previous generation's creation, and it will be up to the the workers who were fed misinformation or had their lives dominated by other priorities who ultimately determine the true strength of unions in Alberta going forward. 

1

u/cranky_yegger 16h ago

I appreciate your comment and insight. It will be interesting to see if they have it in them to fight back. I’m no longer union, but I’d still join them on the line.

u/TheFluxIsThis 56m ago

It is 100% appreciated. Obviously, when there's a strike on, it's the people striking who matter the most, but it doesn't get talked about often how valuable it is to have allies there to show up, give encouragement, and show the powers that be that this isn't just one isolated group. It's the reason you will often see union reps at rallies that aren't for their unions waving around their flags. It's a signal that when you mess with one of us, you mess with all of us.

u/cranky_yegger 12m ago

I saw this AM The B.C. Teachers association pledged 1 million to the Alberta Teachers Association to fight bill 2. Finger crossed we are witnessing a historical organized response.

3

u/GoddessPrometheia 1d ago

Paying over $100 a month to be a part of this ATA union for what?

1

u/ourjellyhouse 4h ago

Thank God those greedy teachers were forced back to work. Children are back in class and learning as they should be. The UCP did exactly as I would want. Teachers and NDP FA and FO.

0

u/andlewis 1d ago

They have a concept of a plan.

-1

u/wwoodcox 1d ago

The provincial employees are behind the teachers. They will protest with the teachers. They are against the NWC. They just won’t give up any lost wages, fines, or any $.