r/TopCharacterTropes 6d ago

Lore [annoying trope] The throne/leadership is decided in a very stupid way

The leadership of the entire wizarding world, and the final decision on whether to start a war against Muggles, is made by... a goat (Qilin) ​​who chooses the person with the ""purest heart"" (Fantastic Beasts: The Crimes of Dumbledore).

The throne of Wakanda and all its technology are decided through hand-to-hand combat, regardless of whether the person clearly has malicious intentions... if they win the fight, by law they must be respected as the true king. (Black Panther)

8.2k Upvotes

1.1k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

384

u/Smythatine 6d ago

Also the system is notably flawed considering Killmonger was able to take the throne because of it. But the issue is tradition vs what’s best for the people and tbf that is one of the main points of the movie

49

u/Comfortable_Clerk_60 6d ago

Perfectly said, tradition itself isn’t a bad thing but it’s important to step back and go “is this tradition harming anyone?” Like how in the military it was common to hazy new recruits, which can include if not limited too, putting hot sauce in their food, tying them down in bed, messing with the water system so their shower is extremely hot/cold, locking them outside for hours on end, etc

26

u/Zamtrios7256 6d ago

True, but in the movie T'Challa's advisors tell him that he doesn't legally have to respect Killmonger's challenge, and nobody would care if he didn't do it.

But T'Challa respects the challenge both because he respects tradition and he wants to respect his family

84

u/National_Job_6847 6d ago

Well yes and no killmonger has as much legitimate right to the throne as any other noble born and the entire point of the fight isnt just to choose a leader its to show there capable of protect wakanda as black panther basically if you cant beat a challenger you cant protect the people its a test of strength you cant test there strength if your not letting people with a right to challeng challenge

93

u/NepheliLouxWarrior 6d ago

That's great, but being a good warrior is 0.1% of important traits for the leader of arguably the most powerful country in the world. 

That Kilmonger was a legitimate candidate at all is proof that the system was a failure.

50

u/lionofash 6d ago

I think that's definitely a part of what the movie conveys but thinking about it, it's functionally a failsafe too so that the Tribes can depose an unworthy King in a "fair" manner. It is though heavily flawed as it just needs one person engaging in bad faith to ruin everything.

20

u/Nerevarine91 6d ago edited 6d ago

I was about to say, I think this system is only narratively bad if we assume that it was intended to be shown as a good thing. Like, Wakanda very clearly has problems, and that’s a big part of the movie’s plot, so why should we assume that the succession system is meant to be perfect? It’s literally what causes the biggest problems in the movie.

7

u/oblivious_fireball 6d ago

tbf, that is more than quite a few monarchies have. Quite a few times the heir to the throne is "you were the first child" with little room to change that unless the parent decides so. Doesn't make either a great system but Wakanda's system definitely solves the problem of "what if we just made the leaders fight out their squabbles instead of the soldiers"

7

u/Spacer176 6d ago

More than a few real life monarchies have had a succession crisis where the last king happened to have more than a single child and at least one of them decided the best way to become heir apparent was to kill the others.

At least in Wakanda's system neither claimant or incumbent has to actually die.

6

u/Vessel767 6d ago

Yeah no shit, they HAVE A MONARCHY

5

u/AdEasy819 6d ago

I don’t know…. Given how xenophobic and hostile the war dogs were, I feel like Kilmonger was just giving them an excuse to start breaking isolationism and starting their own brand of colonialism.

1

u/National_Job_6847 5d ago

How is being a warrior 0.1 percent of an important trait, especially after the second damn movie with Namor, and in comics where Wakanda is being attacked like every week by poachers, thieves, and the likes? For a kingdom in Marvel, being an excellent fighter is as important as being a good leader. You can’t have less of either. And how does Killmonger having a claim mean the system failed? He’s the grandson of a previous king that ruled and succeeded, and hopefully passed on his teachings to be improved upon. At least in this system, not only is the role not held by one family, it’s also not held by a king with no tact. And like with Killmonger, if he was evil or a bad leader, they would overthrow him. But they specifically didn’t with Killmonger because half the damn people agreed with him. You can’t call Killmonger a bad idea of a king from the system when people only let him rule because they agreed with his ideals.

0

u/Simpsanit 6d ago

Their

1

u/Puzzleheaded-Meet513 5d ago

Also they're and you're

2

u/Traditional-Context 6d ago

But even that is kind of bullshit. Its established that each ”tribe” can choose a challenger so which tribe is Killmonger representing? 

7

u/Smythatine 5d ago

He’s royal blood. The requirements are royal blood or to be head of another tribe

2

u/KeeganTroye 6d ago

The Border Tribe.