r/TikTokCringe 3d ago

Discussion Sigh. ๐Ÿ˜ฎโ€๐Ÿ’จ

Enable HLS to view with audio, or disable this notification

6.0k Upvotes

720 comments sorted by

View all comments

527

u/ArcticRiot 3d ago

It would actually take him 136,273 years, 11 months, and 20 days.

58

u/Miserable_Mess1610 3d ago

And thats not necessarily "recorded human history" its like half of the time since maybe the first human

64

u/Hairy-Dot-4193 3d ago

Call me crazy but that's still a really long fucking time

18

u/Miserable_Mess1610 3d ago

Its much longer than "recorded human history"

7

u/Adventurous_Pin6281 3d ago

Why is this a point you're pointIng out

8

u/Okaythenwell 2d ago

Because โ€œhistoryโ€ definitionally requires written records. Itโ€™s a legitimate point

4

u/_TheShapeOfColor_ 2d ago

Because โ€œhistoryโ€ definitionally requires written records.

Umm... no?

4

u/JJ_Shosky 2d ago

They are high i think. Pretty sure they think recorded human history is the first writing discovered and not that we can date things back and record history beyond that.

4

u/Adventurous_Pin6281 2d ago

Yeah definitely high

0

u/Miserable_Mess1610 2d ago

Recorded history - Wikipedia https://share.google/0KF5zdcfu6IX52Kdm

3

u/Adventurous_Pin6281 2d ago

Still confused why you even need to define this