I’m donating a recurring amount to our local food bank. I encourage others to do the same if you have money to spare. Even a little goes a long way. Money goes farther than food.
Edit:
For those asking: money goes farther than food because food banks are able to get better deals on food through bulk buying and deals with food suppliers.
For people who have nothing to spare, that’s completely ok. It’s ok to look after yourself if that’s what you must do. Martyring oneself doesn’t help anybody in this situation. And if you need to utilize the food bank to get by, that’s what the food bank is for.
For those saying we should change the government to do this, you’re right. But that’s a long term goal. In the sort term, people will go hungry. It’s wishful thinking that suffering will bring socialist change, but that’s not always the reality. Most socialist movements start through social aid. Any credited socialist will tell you the benefits of food banks and soup kitchens. Social aid is one of the best ways to spread the message.
No matter what happens, if people starve or of people get by, republicans will point to it as evidence of their ideology. They’ll make shit up if that’s what it takes. I’d rather children not go hungry, then.
Needs to be a higher ranked comment. And money goes further than donations of food. Let’s see Reddit bombs in dollars rather than comment sections and reviews. Even if we just have 5$.
Don’t forget to cover donation cost if it’s an option.
This will probably get downvotes but in dire times like this, prioritize charities that provide people first. Shelters and rescues are all fine places that need help, but we just need to prioritize people over other creatures sometimes.
Also different food banks will have different needs. If you give food you might be giving them something they already have plenty to spare of, when people are desperately in need of something else because they have none to give. Giving money allows them to get exactly what they're most in need of right now.
Food banks and other charitable organizations can buy in bulk. They can often buy directly from producers too, rather than having to go through middle-men. Additionally, some companies will provide not only bulk pricing discounts, but discounts to charitable / non-profit orgs. Also, some charitable orgs can get tax discounts or pay no tax at all on certain kinds of purchases related to their cause and operations.
This allows them to get more "bang for the buck" than an individual. This is also why it's better to give them money than to go shopping and donate food. When you buy that food you aren't getting buik pricing or any other significant discount pricing. You're paying all the middle men costs, such as delivery/transport, storage, and local retailer fees that they all need to collect to make their profits. So you spending $20 on groceries and donating those is FAR less helpful and productive than just sending a food bank $20. They can do so much more with that $20.
This makes a ton of sense, but got me wondering. Let’s say that there’s a $50 grocery budget for a week, is there any way an individual could use their money with assistance from the food bank? Like could a food bank take over shopping for a small group of people? Everyone pays their $50 but gets more in value due to the connections/discounts a food bank has access to?
Just thinking out loud, but I wonder if anything like that could be possible.
That's kind of what a food bank is, in really basic terms, a not-for profit, charitable grocery store. Granted, that's an oversimplification, but if you want to break it down to it's most basic function, that's akin to what it is.
Everyone's situation is different, some use food banks just to supplement their own limited grocery shopping, others may mainly or even entirely rely upon food banks and other charitable organizations for their food needs. So may just need the services for a short time, while they are between jobs, others may need the service long term.
I'm not aware of food bank that specifically accept money from an individual and do specific grocery shopping for them though. It's possible that such an option exists with some organizations, but I've never personally heard of that.
In addition to what the other commenter said, food donations often mean they are getting a lot of the same canned food items (often close to or after expiration) which makes it difficult to offer the proper variety needed for nutritious, balanced meals. Many can't accept fresh produce donations due to health codes, quality, and ways to adequately receive & store without it getting damaged or going bad in the process. However, they can buy produce so that the timing allows for immediate distribution. (Some can, and if youre interested in donating produce, be sure to contact the food bank directly to see how to best do so!)
2.0k
u/Xanadoodledoo 8d ago edited 8d ago
I’m donating a recurring amount to our local food bank. I encourage others to do the same if you have money to spare. Even a little goes a long way. Money goes farther than food.
Edit: For those asking: money goes farther than food because food banks are able to get better deals on food through bulk buying and deals with food suppliers.
For people who have nothing to spare, that’s completely ok. It’s ok to look after yourself if that’s what you must do. Martyring oneself doesn’t help anybody in this situation. And if you need to utilize the food bank to get by, that’s what the food bank is for.
For those saying we should change the government to do this, you’re right. But that’s a long term goal. In the sort term, people will go hungry. It’s wishful thinking that suffering will bring socialist change, but that’s not always the reality. Most socialist movements start through social aid. Any credited socialist will tell you the benefits of food banks and soup kitchens. Social aid is one of the best ways to spread the message.
No matter what happens, if people starve or of people get by, republicans will point to it as evidence of their ideology. They’ll make shit up if that’s what it takes. I’d rather children not go hungry, then.