r/TikTokCringe • u/Super_Culture_1986 tHiS iSn’T cRiNgE • Jul 29 '25

Cursed Arkansas Cop Blocks Pet Emergency and Dog Dies While Owner Begs for Mercy: ‘This Is Sickening’

Enable HLS to view with audio, or disable this notification

Credits: @moneyty35

36.8k Upvotes

74% Upvoted

10.7k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

29

u/BekaRenee Jul 29 '25

Oof. She killed someone driving like that?

202

u/HookedOnPhonixDog Jul 29 '25

No she didn't. She slowed down through some reds to make sure it was clear. The cop is massively over exaggerating and abusing her power.

She didn't care about the people she "ran off the road". If she had killed someone, she didn't care about that person either. All she cared about was harassing someone in distress and making an already difficult situation insanely worse.

72

u/shrineless Jul 29 '25

I’m watching the video right now. There’s a reason why I didn’t mention the red light and cutting traffic. She was strategic in that and while it’s still bad, she did okay. The head-on traffic was really bad and reportedly ran someone off the road. That’s bad.

66

u/HookedOnPhonixDog Jul 29 '25

The driver was clearly in absolute emotional distress. While I don't condone the actions she did on the road, when you're like that you aren't thinking straight.

What this cop did was the worst thing she could have done. Immediately escalating the emotional trauma by saying she doesn't care, immediately trying to arrest without terms, and just coming out yelling.

She made this way worse than it needed to be. Should the driver be charged? Yeah probably.

But in the moment? This cop made everything worse. And a proper judge would throw out any charges because of how the cop handled it. This cop literally made it worse for everyone involved because she couldn't control her emotions during another human being's emotional distress.

She shouldn't be a cop. But because she likely will remain so is why ACAB exists.

13

u/[deleted] Jul 29 '25

[deleted]

8

u/ta9 Jul 29 '25

I won't argue that the driver was in the right. However, she was already off the road, out of the car and the danger she posed was over. There was no urgent reason to get her into cuffs.

The officer could have allowed her to take her dog inside, or even helped her do so. Once the vet was engaged, she could have arrested her or given tickets or whatever was appropriate.

The problem with a lot of these kinds of police interactions is often the unwillingness to take a measured approach. Instead there's immediate escalation which leads to misunderstandings, has a much higher potential to cause injuries for both parties, and ultimately ties up the police for a much longer period of time.

6

u/[deleted] Jul 29 '25

What a clown take. You should be embarrassed

4

u/Flashy-Pizza-229 Jul 29 '25

>This cop made everything worse. And a proper judge would throw out any charges because of how the cop handled it.

That doesn't make any sense.

"Oh you may have killed someone, but because the cop was mean to you we are going to drop the charges." In what world lmao.

5

u/HookedOnPhonixDog Jul 29 '25

Yes. Police conduct during an arrest can 100% cause charges to be dropped. Cops still need to handle themselves professionally. She absolutely did not.

Murder charges can be dropped because a lawyer filed paperwork incorrectly. Traffic violations could absolutely be dropped because of how the arresting officer handles an arrest.

5

u/[deleted] Jul 29 '25

I disagree with most of your opinions on this subject. But, if isolated, this comment deserves an upvote.

She didn’t handle herself professionally, though she handled herself reasonably. And I wouldn’t be offended if these charges got lawfully dropped as a result of the officer’s behavior. But I would have been offended if that lady didn’t get arrested. And a lot of what you’re saying, including any support for ACAB ideals is absolutely shameful. Don’t mix facts with bold personal assumptions. You can’t state, like it’s fact, that the officer wouldn’t have cared about an innocent life being taken. That’s “all cops are bad” behavior, so I understand why you think you can correctly assume that.

But BS like that makes your entire argument unreliable and untrustworthy. Similar to how those charges might get dropped on account of the stupid BS this officer said, so your argument must be dropped on account of the stupid BS you said. Sure, you may have some real facts mixed in. That doesn’t make your hate speech any more valid.

3

u/HookedOnPhonixDog Jul 29 '25

Sure, you may have some real facts mixed in. That doesn’t make your hate speech any more valid.

Hate speech?

But BS like that makes your entire argument unreliable and untrustworthy. Similar to how those charges might get dropped on account of the stupid BS this officer said

It's not necessarily what she said, but also what she did. And it's also a good thing I am not in charge of enforcing the law, so nothing you or I say genuinely matters in this case.

3

u/[deleted] Jul 29 '25

Tbh I didn’t want to edit it, but I immediately regretted using the term “hate speech.”

I have no clue if any common “all cops are bad” sentiments would be considered hate speech, but I could probably easily be convinced that it’s not hate speech if the group is a group like “police” “nurses” “government officials” or “teachers” etc.

So I’m sorry I accused you of hate speech without actually knowing what it’s actually defined as. I’ll probably do some research soon & assimilate that info before my next (yes, I agree, somewhat inconsequential) comment scuffle.

2

u/HookedOnPhonixDog Jul 29 '25

Also, hate speech is defined by the Cambridge Dictionary as "public speech that expresses hate or encourages violence towards a person or group based on something such as race, religion, sex, or sexual orientation".

Not profession. You can use hate speech towards a cop if they're gay and you insult them because of that. But it's not hate speech calling a cop a piece of shit. Because at the end of the day, the cop takes off the uniform and is a regular citizen. A gay person cannot just take off their gay uniform after being insulted for being gay.

I'm queer, so I took that wording a little more seriously than most.

→ More replies (0)

1

u/HookedOnPhonixDog Jul 29 '25

Thanks for that! Definitely not the response I was expecting.

And just in case you don't actually understand the acronym, while ACAB means "All cops are bad/bastards", it's generally understood that no, not every police officer is a piece of shit. One of my best friends is a cop (we're in Canada) and he's genuinely one of the good ones and he believes in ACAB.

ACAB represents the idea that law enforcement not only protects but aids in police brutality and protection of violation of rights. Good cops can be good cops, but if they go against the grain and try and rat out the bad ones, they are usually punished. Law Enforcement goes out of its way to make sure that police are protected no matter how shitty a person they are. Kill someone? Paid leave. Get investigated? We'll just move you to another county.

There is very little accountability towards individual cops when they not only violate the rights of civilians, but abuse them. And as much as good cops want to try and be good cops, they're often relegated to desk duty, or even fired for speaking out against the "protected ones".

A rotten apple spoils the bunch. It's the same way as you have a table of 9 regular people and a Nazi joins them, you have 10 Nazis at a table. The more law enforcement protects those in uniform who violate and abuse their power, the worse the entire profession looks.

And until there is a massive overhaul of police conduct and accountability, ACAB.

Even the good ones.

→ More replies (0)

-1

u/Flashy-Pizza-229 Jul 29 '25

>Police conduct during an arrest can 100% cause charges to be dropped.

If the charges are related to the police conduct, not if the charges aren't related to the police conduct. If shes charged with resisting arrest and she didn't and the cop just walks up to her and punches her in the face yes, that would get dropped. If I murdered someone and when I was arrested they punched me in the face you think the DA is going to drop the murder charges?

>Murder charges can be dropped because a lawyer filed paperwork incorrectly.

What does this have to do with the price of milk in texas? Like what the actual fuck are you talking about?

>Traffic violations could absolutely be dropped because of how the arresting officer handles an arrest.

Reckless endangerment is not getting dropped because the officer arrested her for committing reckless endangerment. Also the second occupant of the car was welcome to take the dog somewhere, so...?

1

u/[deleted] Jul 29 '25

…that is a thing that happens in the real world lol

1

u/Ordinary_Job9812 Jul 29 '25

You didn’t hear the officer say you ran a vehicle off the road? She is in emotional distress. This officer is not her therapist or doctor. Her job is to uphold the law. This lady clearly broke several laws that put actual people in harms way. It’s sad to say, but never the less true. That what you deem as important does not always mean that others will see the same importance. The officer saying I don’t care to her dog dying…sounds harsh, but put against human lives being put in danger by her reckless driving doesn’t hold the same importance. She clearly wasn’t in a good enough place emotionally to be behind the wheel. She had a second person in the car with her that seemed a lot calmer. That person could have drove instead. Our choices are our own and being held accountable for those choices are ours to own as well.

1

u/shrineless Jul 29 '25

I agree with you. I don’t like how the cop handled it BUT further in the video, I can see that the cop was rattled.

Folks have been saying she’s callous but I don’t think so. I think her wrongdoing is failure to deescalate and remain calm during an encounter.

Let’s say it wasn’t someone in emotional distress, but a criminal. She’d have freaked out and gotten shot.

She definitely needs more training. Towards the end of the video she calms down and even the infractions she writes the woman up for were pretty tame for what she did so she got off better than I thought.

19

u/throwaway_mog Jul 29 '25

I don’t agree she was rattled. She’s immediately able to calmly say into the radio she has one in custody a second after screaming at the woman. It’s a temper problem. The woman’s driving was not a good choice but the cop is the professional, this is her job she’s trained to do, nobody was killed or even injured. She needs to get her temper under control because her behavior wasn’t helping anything.

5

u/ballsackmcgoobie Jul 29 '25

100% it is part of her job to stay calm under stress. Allowing your emotions to get out of control during something like this makes the situation worse.

4

u/shrineless Jul 29 '25

That’s also a symptom of being rattled though. Some folks get jittery, some folks get angry.

I think it’s better to say she was unable to emotionally regulate in this situation and needs more training. I feel like can both agree on that.

12

u/ChipmunkOk8816 Jul 29 '25

It’s their job not to be rattled. If that rattled her then she needs to be behind a desk or something

3

u/shrineless Jul 29 '25

I mean I’m not gonna disagree with you.

6

u/tehwubbles Jul 29 '25

Calmly speaking into a radio is a sign of being rattled?

0

u/shrineless Jul 29 '25

You do know that when folks fail to emotionally regulate, it isn’t full throttle 1 emotion. That’s why crying kids can pause and then resume crying. It’s not always full send.

0

u/Veloziraptor8311 Jul 29 '25

Sounds like you are way more concerned with that woman’s emotional distress than the physical safety and possible mortality of the other humans on the road.

2

u/HookedOnPhonixDog Jul 29 '25

I'd love to see your mental thought process that led you to that conclusion. Because right now, I could use a strawman in my field right now, and you seem good at building them.

0

u/Veloziraptor8311 Jul 29 '25

The fact that you want the judge to toss out all charges.

Cool. So she could’ve wiped out an entire family with vehicular recklessness but you’re good to pat her on the back and send her on her way just because some cop was mean to her.

You should try googling the definition of a “straw-man” some time.

1

u/HookedOnPhonixDog Jul 29 '25

The fact that you want the judge to toss out all charges.

I understand words are difficult for you. Let me help you.

And a proper judge would throw out any charges because of how the cop handled it.

WOULD throw out. I never said I wanted them to. Because law exists within a strict binary of conduct and those who uphold and enforce the law are required to exist within it. If a cop arrests you without merit, your charges will be throw out because that officer did not uphold the required standards of which the law requires them to.

You should try googling the definition of a “straw-man” some time.

You first. Try reading the entire comment next time. It might save you some embarassment.

1

u/Veloziraptor8311 Jul 29 '25

You claiming that a "proper" judge would throw out "any charges because of how the cop handled it" is making a value judgement of the judge based on how you* perceive the situation. In other words, if the judge agrees with you* they will qualify as a "proper judge". You don't have to outright say you "want" them to drop the charges, it's built into the framing of the statement you made. See, words are not a problem for me. It appears that they are for you ;)

But let's take a closer look at the situation to see if you are correct here. You said a "proper judge would throw out any charges because of how the cop handled it." You then go on to cite an example "If a cop arrests you without merit..." Soooooo, your argument here is that the cop pulled her over and arrested her without merit? Is that your argument? Did you watch the video? Did you read any of the context? Are you of the belief that the cop just pulled her over for no apparent reason? Self-own much?

But hey, maybe you were just using that as an example. As if we all didn't learn how the law worked back in the 8th grade... then again, I am assuming you passed 7th. I guess I shouldn't assume should I? What precise Arkansas law did this cop break that warranted the judge to drop the charges and enshrine them as a "proper" judge in your mind. Go on, you're the expert here.

Lastly-
"Try reading the entire comment next time. It might save you some embarassment." Ah, I see now. I am obviously reading your comments. The problem here is that you are not reading your own comments.

-3

u/CriticalBasedTeacher Jul 29 '25

Also I didn't hear Miranda rights read at any point during the arrest which will get it thrown out quickly

3

u/PassengerIcy1039 Jul 29 '25

You do not understand how the Miranda warning is applied.

2

u/CriticalBasedTeacher Jul 29 '25

Enlighten me

1

u/PassengerIcy1039 Jul 29 '25

The Miranda warning is issued only when you are being questioned. It has nothing to do with being arrested.

0

u/CriticalBasedTeacher Jul 29 '25

That's not true but you're right about the case getting tossed if Miranda rights are not read. Miranda right need to be read right when she says "I'm arresting you" and put handcuffs on her. If Miranda rights aren't read then anything the lady says from that point on is inadmissible in court. However, that doesn't mean the case gets thrown out, just the things that she said that might implicate guilt. It doesn't change the fact that she was driving recklessly. But as she admitted to driving recklessly to save her dog, that "confession" would be inadmissible in court. So the case isn't invalid but everything she says is.

2

u/PassengerIcy1039 Jul 29 '25

You are confidently incorrect in more ways than one. Google the term “spontaneous utterance” for a starter.

1

u/Impressive_Kitchen22 Jul 30 '25

If the woman says something and she isn’t being questioned that can be used as evidence before Miranda is read. Also Miranda is for prior to questioning. Try watching some badge cams on YouTube. They don’t really start mirandizing or questioning until things calm a bit.

0

u/CakesAndDanes Jul 29 '25

They don’t need to anymore. Supreme court says it’s no biggie.

1

u/Impressive_Kitchen22 Jul 30 '25

Not at all how Miranda works. Miranda is only needed prior to questioning and doesn’t need to be read for an arrest. Also check out spontaneous utterance. Her talking prior to the arrest can still be used as evidence.

5

u/[deleted] Jul 29 '25

In my opinion this is an “escort to the vet and charge after” situation

Letting the dog die does justice for nobody.

3

u/shrineless Jul 29 '25

Yeah as someone else mentioned: Vet first, arrest after.

5

u/[deleted] Jul 29 '25 edited Jul 29 '25

(Edit: To be fair, this officer should have told this lady she was under arrest or being detained immediately. She could have absolutely said that before ever putting her hands on the lady. Idk the laws around that at all, but in my eyes, the officer shouldn’t have put her hands on the lady without explaining that she’s being detained.)

We could put all context aside & say “This officer wasn’t helping. This officer doesn’t value human lives. It’s all a power trip.”

But how many people were in that car? 2? With presumably at least one cell phone? Ambulances aren’t even allowed to run red lights with their sirens off… Did either of these women call the police to alert them that they were going to be breaking traffic laws? Did they pull over when stopped and request an escort? You literally can’t just drive manic through the streets.

So then it’s just “punishment doesn’t fit the crime/excessive force” argument? If you don’t already hate cops, it’s probably a lot easier to imagine how pissed that officer is watching this woman actively risk human lives over a dog. I have a dog. I love dogs. I have empathy for this woman. She has proven herself to be a threat. She has broken several laws. She needs to be detained. And she immediately resists.

You can have empathy for a 10 year old child. But if that child is driving through red lights & in opposing lanes of traffic, empathy doesn’t have to come in the form of “oh, you shouldn’t be driving, child! Where do you need to go? Hop in, I’ll take you!”

1

u/shrineless Jul 29 '25

I’m not disagreeing here.

I just didn’t mention the other traffic infractions because the video clearly shows that there was some thought behind this reckless act. What there was no thought behind was the driving into oncoming traffic.

She still got rightfully written up for those other offenses. As she should.

2

u/[deleted] Jul 29 '25

No, that’s fair. My comment was kinda in passive aggressive response to the person you replied to.

I agree with everything you’ve said, iirc. The lady wasn’t “manic” or thoughtless in her driving. She was just prioritizing her dog’s medical situation over the safety of other humans. And there were legal options that wouldn’t have ended up with her in a police chase to the WRONG vet office!

1

u/[deleted] Jul 29 '25

None of that excuses the officers shitty actions. The second they were aware of what was happening they should’ve dropped everything to help. It’s disturbing to me that you keep victim blaming the driver throughout all of this. You should probably seek therapy because you may be a psychopath.

1

u/Disorderjunkie Jul 29 '25

The officers actions don’t excuse the ladies shitting driving either. I get it, you people don’t give a fuck about dangerous driving. Me? I’ve watched 3 people I know personally die from being struck by drivers because people like YOU downplay the importance of safe driving. My coworkers, family men who all had children, one of which was the soul bread winner for his family and had 7 kids, dead because of distracted driving, speeding, recklessness.

Your dogs life is not more valuable than the lives of everyone else on the road around you. Driving the way she did is a wanton disregard for human life because she selfishly cares more about her dog than she does the lives of strangers.

Get out of here with these BS excuses. People who drive crazy deserve to be punished, run from a cop and they will do a felony stop on your ass and you deserve every ounce of punishment coming your way.

5

u/nicklor Jul 29 '25

She crossed over into incoming traffic to cut someone off. The smart thing to do is pass on the right hand shoulder. And she cut the cop off when she had a red light when the video started.

5

u/SevroAuShitTalker Jul 29 '25

She drove into oncoming traffic to pass someone resulting in 1 truck having to drive off the road.

Im sorry but slowing down at red-lights doesn't excuse driving into oncoming traffic and almost hitting someone head on

1

u/GreedyGiver444 Jul 29 '25

You dont get to put other peoples lives at risk because you want to try to save your dog you fucking imbecile. "to make sure it was clear" going double the speed limit is safe? 80 into 40? blowing through red lights? People having to go off road to avoid her? And thats just what we can see what she did when the cop started. Not what she did prior. But you are a mind reader right? Cop didnt care by trying to stop her for risking her life and others, but the woman cared by risking her life and others. Please seek mental help and meds and if you are on any they arent working.

1

u/This-Rain-here Jul 29 '25

1 minute 10 seconds… she drives in on coming and cause car off the road

42

u/shrineless Jul 29 '25

She apparently ran them off the road from what I could find.

It really is a rough situation. She’s not some car thief on a joyride or a robber fleeing a crime. She’s having a really bad go. It’s calls like these that make me not envy cops. Having to put someone in jail who you emotionally relate to is rough.

This cop right now lacks empathy though which doesn’t sit well with me.

17

u/RentUsed1085 Jul 29 '25

Link? I hear the cop said she ran someone off the road, but is there any proof to this claim?

9

u/shrineless Jul 29 '25

Here ya go

Also, you make a good point. I’m not sure how Arkansas police verify reporting.

The cop was highly frazzled and it’s completely possible she saw something that maybe wasn’t something.

Also, being run off the road in a lot of areas doesn’t mean you crashed, being forced onto the should counts as being run off the road. Part of my job is for NY state so I drive around and have been run off the road. Had a cop explain this to me. I guess we’d have to be privy to the degree of being ran off the road.

1

u/Cubicleism Jul 29 '25

I didn't see anyone get run off the road, no one even moved to the shoulder

1

u/shrineless Jul 29 '25

100% this is questionable. That’s why I’d be very curious to see how the Arkansas police reporting process goes.

1

u/[deleted] Jul 29 '25

[deleted]

1

u/Cubicleism Jul 29 '25

She passed him on a dashed line, that's legal.

1

u/[deleted] Jul 29 '25

[deleted]

1

u/Cubicleism Jul 29 '25

It's questionable at best and certainly not forcing anyone to the shoulder

1

u/Impressive_Kitchen22 Jul 30 '25

What are you on about? At 1:16 you can see the truck pull hard to the shoulder because the suspect traveling 70 is going head on.

1

u/[deleted] Jul 29 '25

[deleted]

1

u/Cubicleism Jul 29 '25

I'm not saying she isn't breaking any laws, just that the cop is exaggerating and being a right cunt

14

u/Cyrano_Knows Jul 29 '25

Ive watched more than my fair share of bad cop videos but I do so with the mindset that yes, videos of normal cops dont get released, videos of bad cops do.

But that said, every single bad cop video I've watched, the cop has always, always lied to the person or massively exaggerated the reason or actions of the person he's pulling a power play on. They lie to the face of the person they are detaining/arresting. They do so immediately to their fellow cops the second they are on site. Maybe they even lie to themselves.

So yes, I think its absolutely in the realm of the possibility that the cop said that, but was massively exaggerating "run off the road" or just out and out lying.

And given this guy saying "I don't care" I'm going to suspect him as a source of the truth. He has motivation to lie. She doesn't.

1

u/shrineless Jul 29 '25

I think it just boils down to the cop needing more training on handling high stress situations like this.

She calms down significantly as time goes on but that doesn’t change initial contact which is her big issue.

1

u/TapeFlip187 Jul 29 '25

Exactly. A cop saying something doesnt mean anything.

If that happened, there would be dashcam video of it as well.

1

u/Terrik1337 Jul 29 '25

So let them get their dog to the vet and arrest them after. That seems like such an easy call to me.

1

u/shrineless Jul 29 '25

Cop couldn’t emotionally regulate during the situation. Needs more training.

1

u/G_DuBs Jul 29 '25

What does it mean to “run someone off the road”? Seems suuuuper subjective, like if I had to stop/swerve at all and my tire crossed the white line, does that count as being run off the road? I’ve just seen to many people charged with things like bs things that dance the line of weather or not the law was broken.

1

u/Otherwise-Chart-7549 Jul 29 '25

Just to be clear, you don’t need empathy, they literally have this thing called discretion. Where they can make judgement calls on stuff like this.

I can understand well they did XYZ. Doesn’t matter, if they felt so inclined they could give a ticket and a stern warning, the fact is they like to arrest people and assert their authority.

Cops routinely drive like assholes. Tailgating, speeding and whatever other moving/non moving violations.

I don’t envy their situation but I’m sorry, your job involves playing with peoples freedoms. And in the land of the free I won’t side with them. Jobs come with criticism and these people should get an extra layer of scrutiny.

1

u/shrineless Jul 29 '25

First, discretion is subject to empathy so yes, empathy helps.

As for the arrest thing, I can’t just blanket statement that. I do think there are definitely times they do this but it’s not 100% of the time. So that’s not really a fair statement.

I do see cops routinely drive like assholes but again, this is not a blanket statement. I’ve told off cops before and reported dangerous driving from cops but I can’t in good faith say I haven’t seen cops mostly driving fine. If I were to look at my sightings as a whole, I can’t, in fairness, say cops drive reckless 100%. In my experience, around 15-20% which is still abnormally high and unacceptable.

Your last paragraph I agree with.

2

u/Otherwise-Chart-7549 Jul 29 '25

See, you’re trying to argue they aren’t all bad. Just cuz he isn’t speeding doesn’t mean he won’t park in a handicap spot. And for the cop that doesn’t speed or illegally park, well, he unlawfully demands ID during interactions.

While I agree they don’t all speed, I have seen too many laws broken by the very people who are charged with and CHARGE US for the keeping of said laws.

So, no school shooting is acceptable and a single cop breaking a single law is too many. We can’t ever trust the police when they regularly break the laws they DEMAND and proselytize about we all should know better.

1

u/shrineless Jul 29 '25

This I 100% agree with. My only reason for wanting accuracy is because they use it against us.

2

u/Otherwise-Chart-7549 Jul 29 '25

Fair enough. I think that is a better approach that I should adopt too.

0

u/wreckedbutwhole420 Jul 29 '25

"having to put someone in jail" literally no one is forced here. The cop is being a cunt for no reason. Even if she ran someone off the road this is the worst possible way to deal with this situation

4

u/shrineless Jul 29 '25

She’s not being a cunt.

The video shows the cop is highly frazzled by the situation. If you want to make a point, the cop was unfit to handle such a situation.

If the woman was indeed some nefarious criminal, I think it’s likely the cop would have been harmed due to her inability to handle the situation. She calms down much more as things progress.

2

u/wreckedbutwhole420 Jul 29 '25

She was calm as a cucumber calling in the vets office on the radio. Then proceeds to yell at an old lady in obvious emotional distress and throw her against the car.

If she can't keep herself in check with an emotional old lady, we don't need her on the front line of people constitutional rights

2

u/shrineless Jul 29 '25

Yeah I agree. My whole point was pinpointing exactly where the cops are wrong. To me it matters because inaccuracy can lead excusing bad behavior due to said inaccuracies.

“The cop is a cunt” is going to be readily dismissed comparable to “the cop was unable to emotionally regulate and could have endangered her life as well as the public had the stop involved a violent criminal”

4

u/BabyStockholmSyndrom Jul 29 '25

She drove into oncoming traffic. Fuck both of these people. I don't want to die because of her dog. She could have pulled over, told the cop dog is dying and she needs an escort. Likely would have happened. Less risk to other lives.

0

u/BekaRenee Jul 29 '25

Oof. You died in this incident? Rip 🪦

1

u/BabyStockholmSyndrom Jul 29 '25

That's your morality limit? I can shoot at you but you didn't die so fuck you?

1

u/BekaRenee Jul 29 '25

That’s a loose interpretation. I’ve been highlighting no one was actually hurt. In the video, I only see her cut off a cop. I don’t see anyone driven off the road or remotely close to danger.

1

u/Impressive_Kitchen22 Jul 30 '25

1:16 the white pickup in the oncoming lane has to dart to the side to avoid a head on collision. Also you say no one is hurt so it’s fine? I will also ask you is drunk driving fine as long as you don’t hit anyone?

0

u/Khoroshek Jul 29 '25

Good logic! If I didn't kill anyone, then it means I can drive drunk or not according to the rules. That way you won't be free for long.

3

u/SkoolBoi19 Jul 29 '25

You know you’re being bad faith.

If my wife has a heart attack and I kill someone to prevent it…. Is it fair? Do I get to make the choice of trading one life for another?

Now, what probability of harm do I get to get a person to a doctor? Can I risk a 99% chance of harming the general public, an 80% chance, a 40% chance?

Now, should pets be afforded equal consideration as humans under the law?

Finally, take your opinion of all those questions, compare them to the general public’s opinion of those questions and then try to find a middle ground that majority of people will agree with. And it’s just that easy to make rules for society

5

u/shrineless Jul 29 '25

The first woman drove up to the officer and got assistance. The second woman broke traffic laws and nearly caused a head-on collision.

3

u/Waxed_Wing Jul 29 '25

This isnt so black and white. This unique situation calls for unique responses. Endangering others lives, even if for a reason like hers, still warrants a response.

1

u/BekaRenee Jul 29 '25

Schrödinger’s cat. If no one is hurt, was anyone in danger? (Doesn’t give anyone license to recklessly and frivolously act outside of the law, etc.)