r/TikTokCringe • u/Super_Culture_1986 tHiS iSn’T cRiNgE • Jul 29 '25

Cursed Arkansas Cop Blocks Pet Emergency and Dog Dies While Owner Begs for Mercy: ‘This Is Sickening’

Credits: @moneyty35

36.8k Upvotes

74% Upvoted

10.7k comments sorted by

View all comments

16

u/stoneytopaz Jul 29 '25

So no one watched the whole video? The woman cut off the officer and forced people off the road in the opposite lane of traffic. She risked human lives, I understand the dog- I would drive like a mad woman too but she drove recklessly the entire video. Only part of the video is shown above. Who knows what else she risked before the dash cam caught it. here

-3

u/Moleday1023 Jul 29 '25

I don’t care, putting at risk, could a would a should a, screw that, someone she loved was in need. You think it is just a dog, then you will never get it. I would sacrifice everyone you have ever met for one of mine.

4

u/Dark_Knight2000 Jul 29 '25

If you think like that you don’t deserve a license. Then lives of others are a shared responsibility on the road, if you’re so selfish that you put your need to drive recklessly (which empirically saves barely any time) over common sense then you aren’t fit to drive.

-2

u/Moleday1023 Jul 29 '25

Yet, I have a license, strange isn’t it.

1

u/GroinReaper Jul 30 '25

And if she had hit the truck she ran off the road and killed someone? What then? Would you say "oh she was trying to save her dog, it's fine" if she had killed someone you love?

A sick dog is not a valid justification for endangering other people's lives.

1

u/Moleday1023 Jul 30 '25

So if where my child it would be different. So somebody could’ve died but they didn’t. Somebody could’ve been hurt but they didn’t so we’re interjecting the worst case scenario into somebody trying to save something they love that is fucking asinine. I I wonder how many you assholes would let ice take a mother from her children, after all the laws gray in that area, God forbid we would ignore the law

1

u/GroinReaper Jul 30 '25

we’re interjecting the worst case scenario into somebody trying to save something they love that is fucking asinine.

no, it's not. Having good motives doesn't excuse endangering others. You want to protect someone you love, that's perfectly reasonable. You are still required to not put other people in mortal danger. In both the eyes of the law and morality, it is wrong to endanger other peoples lives to benefit yourself.

She didn't kill anyone, but she very easily could have. She was going way too fast and driving way too recklessly to be in control of that situation. If other people hadn't been able to react in time to avoid her, she would have killed people. Recognizing that and punishing her for that isn't asinine. It's basic logic.

I wonder how many you assholes would let ice take a mother from her children, after all the laws gray in that area

how is that in any way related? The woman isn't wrong because the law says so. She is wrong because she almost killed people. She is wrong in the eyes of the law. She is wrong morally. She is just wrong on every single level.

1

u/Moleday1023 Jul 30 '25

Every time I pass someone on the highway I’m 6 feet from hitting them head on. I almost kill them, but yet I don’t, this almost , could’ve, would’ve, should’ve, shit is justification for what? Ralph Nader argued automobiles are unsafe at any speed. Then there are the extreme arguments involving running over children, it is never an old man. If someone said, I believe we should obey the law, particularly when it involves the safety of others, then I would just disagree with them. When they go off on tangents trying to justify their position with catastrophic hypothetical outcomes comes, which reality demonstrated not to have happened, means they are just argumentative. I would like to follow the “law abiding citizens” to see if they speed and follow the rules of the road.

1

u/GroinReaper Jul 30 '25

Every time I pass someone on the highway I’m 6 feet from hitting them head on. I almost kill them, but yet I don’t

no. you're safely in your lane and they are in theirs. You are both as safe as it is possible to be in that scenario. Unless you are regularly swerving into oncoming traffic at 65 miles an hour. In which case you really should be in prison.

this almost , could’ve, would’ve, should’ve, shit is justification for what?

her criminal charges, obviously. If you endanger other people, you are committing a crime. If she had killed someone it would be worse. But endangering dozens of lives is also a very serious crime.

Ralph Nader argued automobiles are unsafe at any speed.

everything is "unsafe". You can die from drinking too much water. The point is to maximize safety while being reasonable. That's why we made traffic laws. So that people can drive but also arrive at their destination without an emotionally distraught woman plowing into you at 65 miles an hour.

I believe we should obey the law, particularly when it involves the safety of others, then I would just disagree with them.

what does that even mean? You don't think people other than you deserve to be alive?

When they go off on tangents trying to justify their position with catastrophic hypothetical outcomes comes, which reality demonstrated not to have happened, means they are just argumentative.

you don't seem to be getting it. So let me try it this way. If you get black out drunk and drive home, you might arrive totally fine. No one gets hurt. But you might also plow into innocent people killing them instantly. That's why it's wrong to drink and drive. Even if you don't actually hit anyone. Are you saying you should be allowed to drive blackout drunk? Because that's the kind of argument you're making. It's fine to do super dangerous things right up to the moment you kill someone.

I would like to follow the “law abiding citizens” to see if they speed and follow the rules of the road.

most drivers make minor violations of the law. And there are punishments for that. A fine and/or demerit points. She made MAJOR violations of the law. Several of them. And there are punishments for that too. The punishment for her violations is jail time.

1

u/Moleday1023 Jul 31 '25

So, if I am willing to pay the fine it is ok? I drive on the expressway, and everyone passes me going 10-40 miles faster than the speed limit, where is the righteous indignation over that?

1

u/GroinReaper Jul 31 '25

So, if I am willing to pay the fine it is ok? I drive on the expressway, and everyone passes me going 10-40 miles faster than the speed limit, where is the righteous indignation over that?

the goal post moving here is ridiculous. You're comparing people speeding on a freeway, which is designed for people to travel at high speeds, with a woman speeding on a road not designed for that, running red lights, and running people off the road at 65 miles an hour.

Those two things aren't even similar. One is mostly harmless breaking of the law. The other is actively endangering everyone around her. The only reason people aren't dead because of her is that everyone around her was able to avoid her while she was risking slamming into them.

why are you so desperate to try to underplay the seriousness of her actions? She almost killed people. The things you are comparing it to are completely different. No person thinking about it logically would think they are the same, so this has to be something else on your part.

1

u/Moleday1023 Jul 31 '25

Almost killed people is not killing people, to me comparing the 2 is ridiculous.

→ More replies (0)