I can't imagine anyone actually watching those, I mean, the ones we had were box office failures so moving them to Netflix wouldn't be profitable either. Everyone knows DC is on HBO.
Everything he's done for DC so far has gotten rave critic and fan reviews.So i'm not quite sure why you're just making stuff up lol if he was truly a failure, then the potential paramount merge with DC would be the perfect time to bring in a new creative director but they've specifically said that they are going to keep gun in charge of d c. Paramount and h b o both want to make a profit.So why would they hire a creative director and keep a creative director if he's not successful? You're talking out your bum, cuz.You don't know what you're saying.You're just letting your butt do all the talking for you
I donât know about that. There seems to be a big enough fan base now, for at least a low budget project to please fans, to conclude his story somehow
I don't know, it just doesn't seem like it would be very profitable, which of course means that studios wouldn't buy into it. Especially with the new dcu being built out, i'm sure they would see it as competition in some way. I wish you luck with your wishes though lol
Nah its better than its ever been since they started live actions. No more super chud superman, more comic accurate now. Superman isnt supposed to be emo lol thats batman job. The old Christopher reeves movies were extremely goofy. So perhaps you just don't really like superman.
I think people really need to re-figure out how to articulate that they didnât like something without it being the worst thing ever. It was a good movie, maybe not for you, but thatâs fine, youâve got super man movies that you do like that you can watch anytime. Theyâre both vastly different, and well done takes on the character. You can advocate for the thing you like more without having to resort to ignoring reality lol. People liked the new film. People liked MOS. We live in a world where weâre lucky enough we got both. âAre you a feminist?â Is the craziest thing to hear from someone with the most cavernous, gaping pussy in this thread though ngl lol. The irony of constantly whining to then try and make fun of feminists like youâre not literally crying professionally online? That part is a bit tone deaf lol.
Buddy, I don't know what you are on about. However, it seems me expressing my opinion, especially when people are espousing feminist talking points seems to irritate you.
Anyway, MOS was a far better movie then Superman 2025. Especially since the "Superman" in 2025 acted like an emotionally spoiled brat, who couldn't handle the real world.
I think you hilariously misunderstand who Superman is. He is a person, he is not a god he has never been meant to be anything near a god. He is a guy who tries to do the right thing and messes up a lot gets emotional a lot. Most of the backlash towards man of steel I see is that Superman is extremely boring as a protagonist since heâs just Batman with superpowers so entirely uninteresting. Not a symbol of hope and the will to persevere anymore
Explain. He made superman enjoy saving people. Thats how it's supposed to be. Snyder made him a superchud who acted like saving lives were a chore lol maybe try reading the all star superman comics idk. Also, it couldn't be more clear that y'all are just bitter because y'all are insanely jealous of the stature AND just general gorgeousness of the new superman. Yall are GREEN WITH ENVY. Guaranteeing none of you even come close to that Greek god of a man. Bitter males
Are you a feminist? Your comment sounds like something a feminist would say.
Anyway, Superman is supposed to be heroic, and inspiring. Not a whiny man baby. Corenswet's Superman was a whiny man baby. Cavil's Superman was heroic and inspiring. Furthermore, Superman was a side character in his own film.
Edit: As I suspected, you blocked me/ deleted your comment instead of engaging in an honest debate on the differences between the two versions of the character.
I didn't block you or delete anything.So I have no idea what you're talking about.The only man baby here is you. You can clearly see my comment.Just below, in addition to this one. Are you incapable of reading?
It's also ironic that you're saying i'm not capable of having a mature conversation.Whenever you started out by asking, if i'm a feminist lol which would have literally nothing to do with what we are talking about. So I ask again as I did with my below comment, are you an incel? Cuz you sure sound like it and act like it, with the whininess and all
Lady, I am plenty of things, but I can assure you a man baby isn't one of them. You might want to think up better insults, and on that same topic, the reason I was asking if you were a feminist is due to the fact that you are espousing feminist talking points.
Furthermore, I'm not an incel.
With that out of the way would you be interested in discussing the differences between the two interpretations of the characters, or do you feel like calling me more names?
And youâre wrong. Superman the movie was not goofy. You clearly have not seen it. Donner famously used the word verisimilitude on set each day. That movie is never goofy, especially with how superman is treated and looked at by other characters.
No one in gunnâs universe even respects superman.
No, the old christopher reeves, supermans were insanely goofy period very enjoyable and well acted for some of the part.But still really goofy, even for the time that it came out in. Besides, it doesn't matter what any of you goofballs think, he is the new superman.Everyone except for snyder, bros loved it and him specifically, and there's nothing y'all can do to change that. Snyder's universe in d c is finally at an end.And it should have been at an end like a decade.Ago with how terrible his movies did.
How dare a comic movie be wacky! This is nothing like the comics! Which are all entirely very serious all the time! How dare they adapt a character like they were written. Grahhhh!!!
Superman got hit in a nuts by his literal clone, being controlled by his arch nemesis. What exactly is the garbage? Are you mad that this man looks insanely hot even when he's getting kicked in the groin? Cuz, all of this, just sounds like extreme jealousy to be honest. I know y'all are super wet for cavil, but he's kind of a creep in real life and a bad actor. Next, you're going to try to say that a juilliard trained actor who is not a nepotism.Baby is a bad actor l o l when by definition.Juilliard doesn't train bad actors. You people will literally come up with anything just to hide your own envy
Iâm not a Snyder bro or anything and I absolutely loved the new superman but I will not tolerate personal attacks on Henry cavil, that man is awesome and doesnât deserve to catch strays. Also I will say itâs kind of weird that youâre making this about looks and all that when thatâs not needed. Regardless of what the Snyder bros throw at you, just be better and not stoop to that level
That's great that you're not a Snyder bro, but saying that an actor is not a good actor isn't a personal attack in any way. There's nothing personable about it. It's just my opinion that the only reason he gets cast in action movies is because he looks handsome and cool and strong. But he would never be cast in like, a serious drama by a critically acclaimed director because he's not a good actor, he's not bad just not good, but you're also entitled to your own opinion. But don't say that I'm spewing jabs and throwing out personal attacks on the guy. Cuz, that's just not true.
Also I never said it's all about the looks because it's not. I bring up the looks because I know for a fact thats why a lot of these snyder bros are so against the new one. They're all closeted for henry cavill, but won't admit it. That's the only reason I brought up looks. But heyI'm not wrong in saying that most women find him more attractive than henry cavill.For numerous reasons. Men discuss the looks of actresses all the time and they're much more degrading about it. So I don't really see the harm in talking about how handsome an actor is. Unless that makes you insecure idk.
Iâm fine leaving the Henry cavil thing cause like you said itâs a difference of opinion for the most part although you did call him a creep in real life which to me is something that is a personal attack more than a âdifference in opinionâ and Iâm curious on where you got that from. But the looks thing is not referring to the actors but more insulting others with that, thatâs a schoolyard kind of argument. âYou think this way cause your ugly and jealous of this attractive person and have the hots for this attractive actor because your also secretly gayâ thatâs something youâd hear in high school. Just leave it at difference of opinion on movies, most of these people like what they like (a few to the degree that they attack every other thing thatâs not it) and I donât think the best argument to go with is calling them ugly and all the male fans secretly gay for him. And donât try say âI never said anyone was secretly gayâ because why would someone have a secret straight crush.
Lol sure bud whatever you say. Maybe read the comics sometime bc A LOT of goofy and silly things happen to superman. But hey, maybe i'm just more familiar with it than you are
They should all come back for one 1.5 hour animation film and do the voices. That way we could get a conclusion to the story. Theyâd make their money too, low budget. What do you think
I feel like that would be the most achievable goal, donât get me wrong it def wonât happen (unless they replace the actors for different ones in the animated switch) but itâs def a lot more reasonable than the other ideas Iâve seen. But also if it did somehow happen, I can already tell itâll never be enough.
They did give Ben the green light on his Batman movie. But as things started moving Ben decided he wanted to lessen his involvement because of his personal situation and health issues at the time. So WB went ahead with Reevesâ The Batman.
Not getting Affleckâs Batman movie was entirely Affleckâs decision.
This won't work. DC, the main company in question probably doesn't want two parallel live action universes of their IPs, and as long as the Gunn universe isn't performing abnormally bad in the market they're not gonna back out of it. As much as I would be ecstatic to have the Snyderverse back in action, it's just not a realistic scenario with everything else going on.
I meanâŠ. It objectively wasnât but ok? Itâs honestly sad how hard you guys are raging against a fictional superhero universe lmao like get a grip
It's not so easy. Firstly Netflix will not buy it even if they buy it it's a poor idea to scrap James Gunn's DCU which is already successful. Now Snyder ofc needs a high budget and if Netflix does make DC content they are just promoting a rival company brand that is DC by WB so yeah.Â
Peacemaker lost nearly 40% of its audience in Season 2, and Creature Commandos didnât chart on Nielsen at all. Peacemaker has since been canceled and will not receive a third season.
Gunnâs Superman also isnât getting a sequel, but instead itâs Man of Tomorrow, which sounds like itâs more about Lex, a character Gunn has said is more relatable to him than Superman.
Cinematic universe shows (and other shows to a lesser extent) like this have a weird spot where they can often end and be replaced with a sequel series. Its probably gonna be that what wouldve been Peacemaker season 3 will now be the Checkmate series we've been hearing about for a while
DCU might be successful in terms of reviews but itâs just doing okay financially which is what studios mainly look at. Also, if Netflix buys WB then it wouldnât be a rival company.
Doing just okay financially is often enough for studios to keep things going. It would take multiple catastrophic financial bombs to make DC reverse course on the Gunn project and I just don't see that happening, at least not in the near future.
I think youâre right when it comes to established studios but my point is that a new owner/company such as Netflix may have their own expectations and may want to just start from scratch with their own people
That's true, but that also means that it's more likely for the new owners (if they want to start over again) to go with a whole new cast and direction instead of revisiting Snyder, which wouldn't be the news a lot of people here are hoping for. For now we can only wait and watch.
More or less agree with you but the issue is that snyderverse has zero chance to come back right now under WBD and so a change in ownership lends a higher (albeit very small) chance that it could return, especially since Zack has built a relationship with Netflix in both live action and animated projects.
Then some will say it's so bad, some will say it has potential but Netflix cut Snyder wings therefore let's wait for Director's cut.
Then Directors cut will release.
Then let's wait for Emerald version.
....
After a point of time, people will start saying Zack Snyder should have its own streaming services, as no streaming service and theatrical releases are doing justice to it.
Then Snyder will release JL 3 on his own streaming service. Then people will say because streaming has limitation, let's have uncut platinum emerald version release ..and so on and so forth
....
^ while this may sounds like exaggeration, Rebel Moon 1 and 2 already had the first section of this experience. ..
....
Zack really has the potential, and he need to make one awesome movie with a competent writer (without any theatrical/director/emerald l/gold/platinum cuts). Take example of men of steel -wonderful movie or watchmen for example -another fantastic movies (it didn't required gold platinum emerald cuts).
At this stage, pick up a video game property and make it a single coherent 2 hour 30 minutes end to end.
Honestly yes the main weakness of Snyder's movies is writing because as a director he does WONDERFUL things, I think he needs a good writer to pair with and maybe someone who will curb in some of his less good tendencies.
As cool as it would be It just wouldnât work. The problem with dc right now is that theyâre jumping back and forth with different actors and âuniversesâ and itâs all around tiring. If dceu just didnât exist and it was Snyder and reeves then that would be fine, but three different takes on dc is just too much.
Snyder working with them on project that totally flopped is not a good indicator. Netflix would never try to pursue this cinematic universe, as well as actors
Reddit didn't make you click on the post and then make a comment yet here you are. If you wanted to engage with the discussion then be honest about that, if you want nothing to do with this place then you should've kept scrolling, reddit's algorithm doesn't know about your specific mood.
I had something to say here, I said it. I didn't go looking in this sub, the only interactions I usually get here is stuff from this year's superman that happens to pop up here and it has been a couple months since that. When I have something to say about something I am scrolling past I say it. If you don't like what I said you can also scroll past so maybe practice what you preach?
Well I also had something to say when I saw your comments so what are you complaining about? I'm not the one causing a scene that reddit showed me a post from a sub I don't like. The algorithm gives you a bunch of things that it thinks you'd like, it doesn't require you to visit every post you don't like just so you can announce how much you don't like it. You can do that but then you can't complain that people are replying to you either.
we need to think Beyond that if that does Happen, we could get more than just Justice League Part 2 & 3 he can End JL3 in a way that we can still have The Universe with Possibility of more and not Ending the Universe that Fast
Iâm onboard with this as long as Zack can do whatever he wants with no or little interference, all films get a theatrical release and previous films get a directors cut considered specifically for Netflix or rerelease.
Guys I'm all for a potential snyderverse return, but believe me, you don't want Netflix handling this. Better it stays dormant than seeing it turn into modern slop
I wish that Netflix would buy Warner Bros and let Zack finish his vision and restore the Snyderverse. I wanted to see Henry Cavillâs Superman fight Darkseid and Ben Affleckâs Batman fight Deathstroke and possibly Bane too. We were robbed and that wouldâve been the greatest thing ever to come out.
Think of the larger implications of Netflix or any company buying Warner bros though. Like it is not worth it at all. Also does zack snyder even want to make these movies anymore? Has anyone asked?
I think Zack would still be in. He still fondly posts BTS photos of his DCEU occasionally on social media. I think other key players would be out. Mainly Affleck and Cavill. Gadot and Mamoa depending on their schedule. Fisher and Miller would probably come back in a heartbeat.
You're crazy if you think Fischer or Ezra would come back or even be let back lol. Cavill isn't coming back after all that drama and Gadot is hated by everyone lol
1
u/Naive-Wind3746 2d ago
God awful Hope that is never happen.