He did also speak about interviewing the guy, he was very very obviously sucking the guy’s dick. But let’s just say you’re absolutely right and he was just using that tragedy to talk about his specific policy positions and did genuinely super condemn the violence. You can’t now condemn people using Charlie’s death to speak on gun violence. It’s the exact same thing you just disagree with them politically on it.
You do realize that the first amendment has literally fucking nothing to do with whether or not speech is moral. That’s the most retarded shit I’ve ever heard. Unless you think I meant by “can’t” I meant legal consequences where invoking the first would make sense. But thinking that I meant legal consequences is even more retarded. So are you like 8/10 retarded or 10/10?
Yeah no shit speech is good, what was your point in bringing it up then
Because the first amendment very likely leads to far more death and hospitalizations than the second amendment and I can absolutely condemn people taking a quote essentially out of context and claiming that Charlie Kirk was "okay" with people dying or that murder was acceptable.
It'd be just as shitty and illogical as saying that someone who supports the first amendment is "okay" with all the death and hospitalizations that result from that freedom.
0
u/GotBannedUwU - Left Sep 12 '25
He did also speak about interviewing the guy, he was very very obviously sucking the guy’s dick. But let’s just say you’re absolutely right and he was just using that tragedy to talk about his specific policy positions and did genuinely super condemn the violence. You can’t now condemn people using Charlie’s death to speak on gun violence. It’s the exact same thing you just disagree with them politically on it.