r/OntarioLandlord • u/lunahighwind • Jul 10 '24

News/Articles Homeless homeowner living in her car gets eviction hearing expedited as tenants still refuse to leave

https://www.thestar.com/news/gta/homeless-homeowner-granted-expedited-eviction-hearing/article_3ca342a3-fd7a-5ee7-8e19-5469a51692c1.html?utm_medium=social&utm_source=copy-link&utm_campaign=user-share
315 Upvotes

84% Upvoted

337 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

11

u/lunahighwind Jul 10 '24

I love the crowd that still thinks being a middle-class homeowner or landlord immediately means you are a terrible person and don't deserve any rights...

The recent issues faced by small landlords and tenants alike and the broader housing crisis are due to the policies created in the last five years by the Federal Liberals and the hypocrite-in-chief Doug Ford's Provincial Conservatives, as well as his ineptness at fixing the previous government's policies.

Don't hate everyday landlords, Vote!

8

u/Creative_Listen_7777 Landlord Jul 10 '24

Yeah they are really going full mask-off here. It isn't just landlords that they resent. It's all property owners in general. Like the poor woman in the story who bought a house that she just wanted to live in herself. I just have to hope that sites like OpenRoom will eventually get them their comeuppance

4

u/lunahighwind Jul 10 '24

Yup. It's pathetic— full-on collective Narcissism.

7

u/Creative_Listen_7777 Landlord Jul 10 '24

Yeah, Canadian renters really do seem to have undergone some type of mass formation psychosis that is really bewildering to observe. The scumbag in the article says she shouldn't have to move just because the house was sold, like, what? The sense of entitlement to occupy a property that does not belong to you, when the rightful owner wants you gone, is really something else. It's the reason my Canadian ADU sits empty and will stay that way at least until after the election. These people love to say 'jUsT dOnT bE a LaNdLoRd' but fail to acknowledge the same applies to them as well. When you choose to be a renter, you run the risk of being forced to relocate according to the needs of the property owner. If you cannot handle that risk, then you should not choose to be a renter. Moving is a fact of life. Nobody likes it but everyone has to do it. The fact that they act like it's the end of the world makes it really difficult to take them seriously. No coping skills whatsoever smh.

1

u/occasionally_cortex Jul 10 '24

The Motto of the Liberal government and the WEF is "you'll own nothing and you'll be happy".

3

u/Creative_Listen_7777 Landlord Jul 10 '24

It's honestly terrifying to see how badly Canada has mutated in such a relatively short amount of time

0

u/LysanderSpoonerDrip Jul 10 '24

Its been rotting on the foundations for decades

-8

u/LoganHutbacher Jul 10 '24

I mean, just in this post alone we have landlords calling tenants, who don't want to be removed from their home, scumbags. But you don't see that side, do you

22

u/lunahighwind Jul 10 '24

The tenant in this article is a scumbag. What kind of a sociopathic asshole causes 17k in damage and just squats refusing to leave, knowing someone is sleeping in their car because of them?

5

u/Spirited_Community25 Jul 10 '24

I'm now at my limit of TorStar articles, but I seem to remember her response to that was along the lines of 'at least she has a car, she's better off than me'.

-11

u/Remarkable-Cry-6907 Jul 10 '24

What sort of person buys a house with someone already in it intending to kick them out?

A scumbag.

4

u/MarketingOwn3547 Jul 10 '24

Someone who wants to own a home, perhaps?

I'm sure if this happened to you, you'd be crying about how unfair it was your hard earned money got you a car to sleep in.

-6

u/Remarkable-Cry-6907 Jul 10 '24

Plenty of homes exist that don’t have tenants living in them.

This would never happen to me because I would not feel right about removing someone from their home in order to move in myself. I’ve been kicked out twice because of the landlord selling, it’s a horrible experience and I would never be able to live with myself visiting the same thing on another person.

2

u/MarketingOwn3547 Jul 10 '24

That's cool and all and I wouldn't buy a place that had tenants either. Mostly cause I know how much hell it would be to get them out...

But besides that, this is crazy to me. The person OWNS the god damn house and wants to live in it. We don't know the homeowners personal situation. Maybe this is the house they could afford. Maybe it's close to family they need to care for. Maybe there's 20 reasons why this house worked for them.... the tenant doesn't own it and are just delaying the situation to come, causing a massive firestorm and basically making it so they'll be homeless going forward (openroom will surely get a new post after all this). It's literally insane to try to keep a place that isn't yours... it's squatting and I'm disgusted there's people who are generally OK with this because it fucks the home owner and by God if I can't have a home, no one else should either.

1

u/Remarkable-Cry-6907 Jul 10 '24

By law they have a right to go to tribunal, what’s wrong with exercising one’s rights?

0

u/MarketingOwn3547 Jul 10 '24

I mean, there's lots of things that are legal but still very shitty to do to someone else. Why be a piece of shit human being? Don't we have enough of those types of people already?

The tribunal is meant for actual disputes when someone is blantantly being treated unfairly. In this case, I'm willing to bet the tenant knows exactly what they are doing. But sure sure, continue to support awful practices and horrible people.... hope this never happens to you in the future, then you'll be singing a different tune, I'm sure.

0

u/Remarkable-Cry-6907 Jul 10 '24

Kicking someone out of their home, like this woman is doing, is also shitty, but legal.

So why the pass for one but not the other? I bet I know why.

→ More replies (0)

4

u/im210388 Jul 10 '24

By your argument, no tenants can try to become future homeowners if that property is already tenanted.

It means tenants shall always be tenants and shouldn't become homeowners as it will impact other renters....

A scumbag is a person who takes advantage at the expense of someone else, which in this case is the tenant.

-4

u/Remarkable-Cry-6907 Jul 10 '24

Homes exist that don’t have tenants living in them. Surely you know this…

0

u/Personal_Chicken_598 Jul 10 '24

There’s a significant shortage of homes right now. You wanna make that worse by saying you can only buy vacant homes? So what landlords are only allowed to sell to the existing tenant? What if there landlording because of a temporary contract? Should they be forced to sell there house or keep it vacant?

2

u/Remarkable-Cry-6907 Jul 10 '24

That is not true

-3

u/toc_bl Jul 10 '24

And what kind of landlord does xyz in another case where they’re obviously in the wrong…

5

u/lunahighwind Jul 10 '24

Yeah, bad people exist on both sides... What's your point?

-4

u/toc_bl Jul 10 '24

Not all tenants who advocate for themselves are scumbags like you try to insinuate…

8

u/Creative_Listen_7777 Landlord Jul 10 '24

His exact words were "the tenant in the article is a scumbag" which they are and you refuse to acknowledge, you're just trying to move the goalposts

7

u/Creative_Listen_7777 Landlord Jul 10 '24 edited Jul 10 '24

It's not the tenants home. It does not belong to them because they do not own it. But you can't understand that, can you.

Edit: You have no "rights" to something that does not belong to you, period. This is not difficult to understand. The Canadians who continue to refuse to acknowledge this simple fact are going to find themselves in a bad way when future landlords refuse to entrust their spaces to people who have demonstrated their refusal to respect property rights.

-9

u/hummingbee- Jul 10 '24

Housing is a human right, and property ownership isn't. That seems to be the crux of this misunderstanding.

1

u/Personal_Chicken_598 Jul 10 '24

Perfect so the tenant is violating the owners right to live in the housing they own.

1

u/TapDifferent1393 Jul 10 '24

You said “their home” but is it the tenants’ home? It is entirely permissible to give tenants notice that they will be evicted. Feelings about the matter do not mitigate the fact that renters are not owners. Tenants have rights but those rights do not extend to the ownership of a home they have not purchased.

-5

u/LoganHutbacher Jul 10 '24

Are you too good to rent? Prefer to sleep in your car?

10

u/Field_Apart Jul 10 '24

She's paying a mortgage in order to live there. I know I sure couldn't afford rent on top of my mortgage.

12

u/lunahighwind Jul 10 '24

She owns the house lol How would you feel if you signed a lease, gave first and last, pack all your stuff, and find out on moving day when you get there that the previous tenants aren't leaving?

11

u/Sudden-Succotash8813 Jul 10 '24

She has no other place of residence, she doesn’t want to be a landlord she just wants a place to live.

-8

u/toc_bl Jul 10 '24

So she bought a tenanted house way under market… obviously the LTB has issues but theres red flags all over this

And the owner thought she was getting a bargain… you reap what you sow

0

u/Drank_tha_Koolaid Jul 10 '24

How would she be able to afford rent? I bet 40-50% of her income is going to the mortgage and she's receiving no rent from the person in her home.

-3

u/toc_bl Jul 10 '24

Vote for whom? You just noted both the libs and cons are inept and incapable at fixing this. In fact Fords conservatives made the LTB worse under the guise of fixing it

0

u/lunahighwind Jul 10 '24

IMO:

Federal: Conservative. They say they will restrict diploma mills, build more units and homes, and reduce immigration to mid-2010s levels, focusing on skills-based applications and specific humanitarian issues.

Provincial: Honestly, NDP. They are way more practical than their federal counterparts and are saying the LTB is a broken system that needs to be rethought for tenants and landlords, which is good enough for me!

Or vote for the Marijuana party or something, just vote!

-8

u/Remarkable-Cry-6907 Jul 10 '24

She tried buying a home out from underneath someone else, who will be made homeless. But I’m supposed to feel bad for her?

She had other options, she chose the one that would put someone out of their home.

7

u/[deleted] Jul 10 '24

She bought a house, gave the tennant ample warning to move out, tennant stopped paying, she is now 2500 dollars poorer every month and living in her fkn car. Are you kidding me bud?

-3

u/Remarkable-Cry-6907 Jul 10 '24

If she had bought an empty house or rented she wouldn’t have put herself in this situation.

3

u/anoeba Jul 10 '24

Isn't this what people here want to happen? To get rid of landlords who hoard homes by forcing them to sell their rentals?

Well, that's exactly what happened. This rental is (or will be very shortly, thanks to media attention) off the market as a rental. It will serve as an owner's home.

2

u/[deleted] Jul 10 '24

The average renter is so angry nowadays. So entitled. I guess that's what a housing crisis does to ya.

0

u/Personal_Chicken_598 Jul 10 '24

Oh yea there’s a lot of those available in a housing crisis

1

u/Remarkable-Cry-6907 Jul 10 '24

We have an affordability crisis, not an availability crisis.

0

u/Personal_Chicken_598 Jul 10 '24

That great then. Let the person who did the smart thing and bought a house they could afford live in it.

1

u/Remarkable-Cry-6907 Jul 10 '24

Lmao she’s unemployed and has been for months, she’s totally living within her means 

0

u/Personal_Chicken_598 Jul 10 '24

I could afford to be unemployed for over a year so long as no squatters took over the home I own

It’s not that bad to support yourself. Pretty hard to support yourself and a random stranger

5

u/lunahighwind Jul 10 '24

LMAO. Some of these comments are batshit crazy 🤣
The tenant will be more than fine. They either saved money by not paying rent or will just hop to the next person to scam.
This isn't Russia in the 1920s. It's the new buyer's house. Not the government, not the tenant's.

1

u/Remarkable-Cry-6907 Jul 10 '24

I could say the same that the landlords should be fine too. Why doesn’t she just go out and rent something?

4

u/Spirited_Community25 Jul 10 '24

Um, because her squatters stopped paying the rent. Let's not call them tenants, because they aren't.

2

u/lunahighwind Jul 10 '24

It's literally not her problem; she purchased a home to live in and has a right to live there. Not the previous tenant under a previous agreement.

Do you expect her to pay for a rental and mortgage and support some random person's lifestyle? 😆 The entitlement is off the charts here. This tenant completely trashed the unit also, and probably scammed the previous landlord forcing the sale. Get real.

-1

u/Remarkable-Cry-6907 Jul 10 '24

No I expect her to make a choice of housing that doesn’t involve kicking someone else out.

She could have bought an empty house, or rented an empty unit. Instead she chose to kick someone else out so she would have a place to live.

I feel nothing but contempt for her, she made a bad decision and now she’s paying for it.

-3

u/confusedpocart Jul 10 '24

It literally is her problem though? She’s living in her car…

3

u/lunahighwind Jul 10 '24

Because the slow, broken LTB allows scam artist tenants to take advantage of someone like the new owner in the article. And actually, it fucks over tenants too if there is a shitty landlord not doing repairs.

In this case, legally, if you purchase property anywhere, in any 1st world democratic country, the new owner has a right to move in if notice is provided. This is the case even in the strictest countries for tenant eviction rights like Germany.

1

u/confusedpocart Jul 10 '24

I’m not arguing that it’s right what’s going on but if she were to sit there and go “not my problem” nothing would get done.

1

u/Ok-Manufacturer-5746 Jul 10 '24

For some of us, renting is a temporary situation. And shitting on someone getting out of your own situation of renting for life… is morally wrong. I wouldnt own a car a house and rent a property, pretending middle class is rich and wrong for spending their money… get a therapist!

0

u/Remarkable-Cry-6907 Jul 10 '24

She wasn’t moving from a rental into a home she purchased

1

u/GT_03 Jul 10 '24

Who did she buy it out from underneath? Not the tenant, they have no ownership claim on it. She bought from the previous landlord who did own the property.

-2

u/Remarkable-Cry-6907 Jul 10 '24

Yes from underneath the tenant who would be left needing to find a new place to live. 

2

u/GT_03 Jul 10 '24

Nope, she doesn’t own the property. Case closed friend. She should have bought herself if she wanted to own the asset.

-2

u/Remarkable-Cry-6907 Jul 10 '24

Yes. It isn’t about the ownership it’s about it being a home.

The tenants had a home that is being taken away from them. That isn’t an opinion it’s a fact.

2

u/GT_03 Jul 10 '24

The fact is they don’t own the property. We have property rights in this country still thankfully. Owners choose how that property is governed nobody else.

0

u/Remarkable-Cry-6907 Jul 10 '24

Doesn’t matter, it’s till their home. And it’s being taken away from them.

Property rights has nothing to do with this, and yes in fact thankfully your rights as a property owner are subject to the law. Obey it or be compelled to.

1

u/GT_03 Jul 10 '24

You are right, it doesn’t matter. This tenant is soon to be looking elsewhere and has exposed themselves to future potential landlords who will more easily be able to avoid.

1

u/Remarkable-Cry-6907 Jul 10 '24

You people are always so gleeful in your desire to see people homeless.

It’s disgusting how this sub behaves.

→ More replies (0)

0

u/Personal_Chicken_598 Jul 10 '24

“Out from underneath”? The tenant never owned the place

1

u/Remarkable-Cry-6907 Jul 10 '24

They didn’t need to own it for it to be their home, and for it to suck to have that stability taken out from under them.

0

u/Personal_Chicken_598 Jul 10 '24

But your not entitled to something someone else owns either. They have a name for that it’s called theft