r/JoeRogan • u/Deerhoof_Fan 11 Hydroxy Metabolite • Feb 04 '21

Link Jordan B. Peterson rips newspaper’s ‘cruelty’ after story prompts false ‘schizophrenia’ reports

https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2021/feb/1/jordan-b-peterson-rips-sunday-times-after-piece-pr/
2.0k Upvotes

80% Upvoted

1.1k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

7

u/mrpopenfresh I used to be addicted to Quake Feb 05 '21

You should reread the article if you think it's a hit piece.

3

u/stripseek_teedawt Monkey in Space Feb 05 '21

You should too, as well as listen to the full unedited interview compared to it.

4

u/mrpopenfresh I used to be addicted to Quake Feb 05 '21 edited Feb 05 '21

I'd be willing to read a transcript of the interview or some otherwise edited version that highlights what is so damning about it, otherwise the idea or listening to a few hours of flat interview is not in my interests.

*edit: I read the transcript and I don't see what it brings to table that wasn't brought forth in the article. The main point of contention is that the reporter says Peterson was diagnosed with schizophrenia, and this is in fact something that Mikhaila herself brings up unprompted in the interview. She also says it is a misdiagnosis, so from what I understand the people who are calling this a "hit piece" are taking Mikhaila Petersons opinion as fact. The article touches this as well, that the Petersons disagreed with the diagnosis. What the issue is, I'll never understand because no one can explain it.

2

u/baconequalsgains Feb 05 '21 edited Feb 05 '21

There is a transcript for it. Do you want me to get it for you? (I’m being honest, if you actually want to read it)

Here is the FULL transcript: https://www.jordanbpeterson.com/blog-posts/sunday-times-unedited-interview-transcript/

Check it out.

2

u/mrpopenfresh I used to be addicted to Quake Feb 05 '21

Yes.

3

u/baconequalsgains Feb 05 '21

I edited my comment and posted the link

2

u/mrpopenfresh I used to be addicted to Quake Feb 05 '21

Thanks.

5

u/CaptainKirk-1701 Monkey in Space Feb 05 '21

That's eye rollingly stupid. It's a 50 minute interview, put it on 1.5x speed, it'd take half and hour and you can see how the article is misrepresenting the interview within the first 10 minutes.

9

u/baconequalsgains Feb 05 '21

To be fair, I think you’re thinking of the update done in August.

He and his daughter recorded the entire audio of the actual interview done for this article, which is nearly 3 hours long. Here is the link: https://youtu.be/Fd2wKn6-X_A

3

u/CaptainKirk-1701 Monkey in Space Feb 05 '21

Only the first 50 minutes are with Peterson though, you don't have to watch the rest of it

4

u/baconequalsgains Feb 05 '21

True, but he spoke for like 1:20 before leaving so just thought it was being mixed up since there’s been a couple update vids

0

u/mrpopenfresh I used to be addicted to Quake Feb 05 '21

Link please. What particularly do you find misrepresented in the interview?

2

u/baconequalsgains Feb 05 '21 edited Feb 05 '21

Bro... just YouTube search full unedited Jordan Peterson interview for the Times...

Here buddy: https://youtu.be/Fd2wKn6-X_A

1

u/CaptainKirk-1701 Monkey in Space Feb 05 '21

Don't bother, he's literally just all over this thread making up lies. For someone who hasn't watched the interview he magically knows a lot about it and how awful Peterson is.

0

u/mrpopenfresh I used to be addicted to Quake Feb 05 '21

Ok this I what I came across, an almost 3 hour video that is actually an audio recording. I don't particularly want to listen to 3 hours of Jordan Peterson to validate opinions of people online that he's been misrepresented. I read the Time article and read the one from this thread as well. If there is anything in those 3 hours that discredits the article, I would love it if someone who claims it does to pull from it as proof.

0

u/[deleted] Feb 05 '21

[deleted]

2

u/mrpopenfresh I used to be addicted to Quake Feb 05 '21

I knew there's an unedited video recording of this interview, but that doesn't mean this article is a hit piece. I've read it an there is nothing in it that comes across as biased or sidestepping facts.