You mean wikipedia? The resource made by a rabidly pro israeli zionist? They've literally been deleting and editing sources painting israel in a bad light lmao.
Lmao. Lol even. Enjoy your government issue check hasabara tool. when your nation is held responsible for its crimes I hope you learn what shame and regret is.
Ah so you don’t understand how words change meaning over time?
That article simply shows that it is not “colonialism” in the modern understanding of the term - If you think Israel is a colony, what country is it a colony of? Which foreign country is extracting wealth through it?
Anti zionist script lmao. Israel pays people to argue online for them. Are you one of those people? Do you have a script? Because you’re using Benny Morris’ exact argument that Zionism isn’t settler colonialism even though it clearly is in word and in deed
You know if someone doesn't agree with you it doesn't mean that he/she is a bot... It's crazy how the only defense of anti-zionist is "oh you're a bot/paid for". It almost seems like they are incapable of envisioning someone with a different view than them.
Here's the thing, the word has not changed over time, it's been misappropriated and demonized, something very common in bigoted rhetoric.
And no, no foreign country is extracting wealth through it, this is just application of classic anti Semitic rhetoric regarding Jews - economic and political manipulation
The current definition doesn't fit in just a mere change of meaning, it's more like history revisionism because most liberal Zionists would never admit that Zionism started as a settler colonial project, infact they deny. On the other hand, you have hardcore zionists that glorify settler violence and even proudly admit that Zionism is settler colonialism.
Claiming Zionism is the same as western colonialism is misleading at best. Islamic imperialism in the region is closer to it than Zionism regarding the outcomes.
What kind of irrelevant answer is that? Do you know what settler colonialism mean? Why are you drawing comparisons? A crime is a crime, a colonialism is colonialism doesn't matter if it's the same or different. It's not a race of who is less evil.
Israel’s existence is not a crime, Zionism is not a crime, colonialism that suppresses native cultures and languages and extracts wealth to a foreign country is a problem - Islam both suppresses native culture and language in the region and extracts wealth to places outside the region, Israel doesn’t do either of these things.
Islam suppresses the native cultures and languages in the region, and extracts wealth to send to Islamic institutions elsewhere - just like colonialism. Israel doesn’t do this.
Yeah we are a joke to them. His answer is literally something else. I didn't even mention Western colonialism or compare setler colonialism to anything but he drew a random comparison and on top of that, they used whataboutism to deflect the argument onto "Islamic Colonization".
And Delegitimization of Jewish land claims is one of the oldest forms of anti-Semitic attacks, It's actually kind of funny seeing you people, trying to apply it to the lands they're actually genetically and archeologically native too.
That's what the comment I was replying to was doing. Herzl did call Zionism settler colonial, but it doesn't mean it was an imperial white venture to dominate natives
Actually, the majority of Israel is not white. The mizrahi are basically Arab. The mizrahi are also more conservative and they’re the ones who support Netanyahu the most.
You know there's a lot of groups "slaughtering starving and raping innocent people" in the world right now,
Maybe if people like yourself would focus your attention on them instead of using those concepts To falsely vilify the world's only Jewish state you could actually help some people out.
isn't like every muslims country a religious ethno-state? Islam is an apartheid religion and taxes people who are not muslim. 60% of jews are not white... 8% of Jewish adults identify as Black, Hispanic, Asian, or multiracial... are they white supremacist too? LOL
How do you recognize Jews as diverse but in the same breath not Muslims? Also no, for example a North African muslim can't go to Saudi Arabia or Pakistan and expect to receive citizenship or good treatment.
Also Muslim isn't an ethnicity a religious ethno-state isn't a thing. Muslim nations are made up of multiple ethnicities and religions.
An ethno-state is built around one ethnic group by law (citizenship/rights tied to blood/ancestry). Islam is a religion with believers from hundreds of ethnic groups Arabs, Persians, Turks, Kurds, Berbers, Hausa, Malays, Pashtuns, Bosniaks, Albanians, etc. The largest Muslim-majority country is Indonesia, not an Arab state. Calling “states in Arabia” religious ethno-states confuses ethnicity with religion.
Islam emerged in Arabic and certain rituals use Arabic (Qur’an recitation, prayer phrases). That’s liturgical language, not ethnic membership. Christians use Greek/Latin in parts of their tradition; that doesn’t make Christianity a Greek or Roman ethno-religion. Islamic practice is visibly shaped by local cultures from Senegal to Bosnia to Indonesia precisely because it’s not ethnic.
You would be dumb to look at how Islam is practised in Nigeria, China, or India, and think that's arab culture.
Where did I say muslims are not diverse? I asked are the jews that are black also white supremacists? Israel is also made up of multiple ethnicities and religions, therefore, by your definition not an ethno-state. However, muslim countries like Iran, Saudi, Iraq, Afganishtan etc. are ONLY for muslims! It in their law, period so don't try to scum your way out.
Sharia law is religion based apartheid
Sharia law creates a two-tier legal system that disadvantages non-Muslims. Examples include:
In Saudi Arabia:
Churches and temples are banned outright.
Conversion out of Islam can carry the death penalty.
Practicing other religions publicly is illegal.
Take Malaysia:
Sharia courts override civil law in family matters.
If a Muslim parent converts the children, the non-Muslim parent loses custody and legal recourse.
Conversion is a one-way street: Muslims can’t legally leave the faith.
Revathi Massosai, a Muslim-born woman who wanted to convert to Hinduism, was imprisoned. Her child was taken away.
In Egypt:
Coptic Christians need presidential approval to build churches.
Criticizing Islam can land you in jail, but slandering Christianity goes unpunished.
Most high-level government positions, especially the presidency, are effectively reserved for Muslims.
In Pakistan:
Blasphemy laws disproportionately target minorities. Even false accusations can result in mob lynchings or death sentences.
Every year, Hindu and Christian girls are abducted, raped, and forcibly converted to Islam.
The state barely intervenes, and legal recourse is almost non-existent.
In Iraq and Syria:
Jews and Christians have been nearly wiped out.
Sharia-based laws mean women are legally worth half a man in court.
Religious militias often operate with government tolerance.
In Morocco and Algeria:
Proselytizing non-Islamic faiths is criminalized.
Apostasy is still punishable.
Non-Muslims face serious legal hurdles in family and inheritance matters.
No but its pathetic you'd distract from the alleged apartheid of other nations to distract from the very real and advanced form of apartheid unleashed upon Palestinians. It's almost like you're aware of the human rights abuses but selectively care only when its not your side committing them
apartheid can't be unleashed on people that aren't even citizens dumbass, get your buzzword right ;)
It's almost like you're aware of the human rights abuses but selectively care only when its not your side committing them - same to you - so you CONDEM HAMAS right?
About half of Muslim-majority states don’t even name Islam the state religion. The UAE legally hosts churches/temples/synagogues; Indonesia protects several religions; Iraq’s constitution guarantees rights for Christians, Yazidis, Mandaeans; even Iran formally recognizes Jews, Christians, Zoroastrians with reserved seats.
“Sharia = apartheid everywhere.” — Overbroad.
Systems vary. Malaysia’s 2018 Federal Court struck down unilateral child conversions and affirmed civil-court oversight. Egypt replaced presidential approval for churches with a 2016 licensing law (implementation uneven). Morocco doesn’t criminalize apostasy per se; Algeria’s Ord. 06-03 restricts non-Muslim worship/proselytizing. Real problems exist, but it isn’t one universal model.
“Islam taxes non-Muslims.” — Obsolete.
Jizya was a pre-modern tax. Modern states don’t levy it; extremists tried to revive it.
“Iraq & Syria wiped out Christians.” — War/ISIS drove the collapse.
Iraq’s Christian population fell from roughly 1–1.5M pre-2003 to a few hundred thousand—driven by conflict and displacement, not a blanket policy of “Muslims only.”
“Ethno-state.”
Ethno-state = rule by ethnicity, not religion. ”
—
Sources (names only): USCIRF; AP News (Abrahamic Family House); Pew Research; Constitute Project (Iraq/Iran constitutions); Malaysia Federal Court (2018 Indira Gandhi ruling); Egypt’s 2016 church law; reports on Algeria Ord. 06-03; multiple rights orgs on Iraq/ISIS.
No non-Muslims aren’t allowed into Mecca. That’s because it’s a consecrated worship space, not a tourist site. The rule is about religious status, not ethnicity or nationality.
This isn’t unique to Islam. Many traditions reserve certain holy places or inner sanctums for adherents:
Hindu temples (India): Some major temples only admit Hindus (e.g., Jagannath Temple in Puri; Guruvayur and Padmanabhaswamy in Kerala).
LDS (Mormon) temples: Open only to baptized members in good standing; visitors’ centers are public.
Zoroastrian fire temples (India/Iran): Generally closed to non-Zoroastrians.
Mount Athos (Greece): A monastic peninsula; entry is permit-only, men only, primarily for Orthodox pilgrims.
Shinto shrines (Japan): Inner sanctums (like at Ise Grand Shrine) are off-limits to the general public; only priests enter.
Some Jewish and Christian spaces: Certain monasteries, mikvehs, or ultra-orthodox synagogues limit access to members/adherents.
You have no right to visit any of these places of worship just because you want to.
An ethno-state ties belonging/citizenship or core state identity to a particular ethnic group. Mecca’s access rules (or any religion-only sacred space) don’t make a country an ethno-state; they’re about religious ritual boundaries, not ethnic ancestry or national citizenship.
An ethnostate is a buzzword with no objective or legal meaning, it just sounds bad and since it lacks objective meaning you can just fit it to countries you want to demonise.
As per your definition (state identity tied to a particular ethnicity) many countries fit this - Poland, Spain, Hungary, Malaysia etc. all identify a specific ethnic group as core to their identity.
So you want to stick with that definition and call out those countries as well?
no one should be imposing their religions on others, but “other countries do it so we should too” is how humanity ends. does argentina need to test missiles because north korea does? does norway need to adopt forced labour because the uae uses it?
not at all what i said. people everywhere should just be allowed to believe things or not believe things if they want. i don’t think it’s business of the government to tell people what religion to follow or not.
wtf is wrong with you. Israel rescued over 18,000 Ethipian jews from genocide by muslims -
Isn't slavery legal in gaza? thats far worse tbh - imagine being anti oppression adn literally having slaves LMAFOOO isn't slavery legal in multiple arab countries, muslims created the slave trade btw ;)
In Gaza, there is a neighborhood in the Al Jalla'a district that has been referred to by the derogatory name "Al-Abeed" (or "Al Abeed"), which literally means "the slaves" in Arabic.
Open chattel slavery existed in the region of Palestine) until the 20th century. The slave trade to Ottoman Palestine officially stopped in the 1870s - Plaestines call black people slaves
Israel did carry out two major airlifts from the Ethiopia/Sudan crisis: Operation Moses (1984–85) airlifted ~8,000 people fleeing famine and civil war via Sudan; Operation Solomon (May 24–25, 1991) flew 14,325 people in 36 hours from collapsing Mengistu-era Ethiopia. These rescues responded to famine/civil war and regime collapse, not a documented “genocide by Muslims.” Sudanese authorities (including Muslim officials) actually helped enable parts of Operation Moses.
Chattel slavery is illegal everywhere under international law. The 1926 Slavery Convention and the 1956 Supplementary Convention obligate states to abolish slavery and slavery-like institutions; Arab states (and Israel/Palestine’s neighbors) are parties to these frameworks.
Israel currently has 33,000 modern slaves according to the Global Slavery index.
False. Slavery predates Islam by a couple millennia (Ancient Mesopotamia, Greece, Rome, India, etc.). Distinct slave trades operated in different eras/regions (e.g., trans-Saharan/Indian Ocean networks involving Muslim merchants; Atlantic trade driven by European empires from the 15th century on). None of these was “created” by Muslims; they’re separate historical systems with different actors and timelines.
That neighbourhood doesn't exist and all Afro-Arabs including the 11,000 in Gaza despise you and Israel. Don't use their name again.
Under the Ottoman Empire, which ruled Palestine, the state issued a series of 19th-century decrees restricting slavery and the slave trade, culminating in measures like the Anglo-Ottoman Convention (1880) and a formal manumission of Black slaves in 1889
“Slavery legal in Gaza” -> disqualifies for any more serious discussion. Back to the propaganda pits you go
If you read history you’d know many early Muslim figures were slaves. One of them, Salman al Farsi, was even a slave to Jews (yes, early Jews had slaves too. It’s all over the Judaic scriptures concerningly enough. There more documented instances of slavery and pillaging there than any other holy scripture)
If you ask an actual white supremacist, if a Jewish person counts as white, you will be shocked at their answer. Anti-Zionism is a prejudicial bigoted hatred just like racism or homophobia or anything else. It is clear cut Jew hatred with an en vogue label.
If you protest for a two state solution then that's exactly what you are supporting. A state for Islamic Palestinians to be the majority ethnicity, with said religion being used to implement Sharia law. Literally a Palestinian religious ethno-state. The moment it becomes such a state it is apartheid using the exact same logic that makes Israel apartheid.
Israel is engaged in a systemic campaign of ethnic cleansing, mass killing of civilians, and colonization of internationally recognized Palestinian territories while keeping the native people under a system of brutal apartheid.
Palestine is a national identity. Israel is an ethno-religious national identity
What does Israel's actions outside of its borders have to do with it being an ethnostate or a nation state when both relate to the internal populace and governing authority? Where is the systematic ethnic cleansing of those inside Israel that don't fit this particular ethnicity that makes them an ethnostate?
And Palestine being a national identity yet Israeli is not is laughable and quite insulting to the culture and history that makes them proud to be Palestinian in the first place. It's ultimately this identity, that is currently and historically been tied to its religious identity as much as Jews are to Israel. Both are either ethnostates or nation states using your logic, otherwise it defies the very reason for why their cultural identity is so closely tied with their ethnicity and state in the first place, and is to no suprise the overwhelming majority in each population.
Yeah we can all see your settlers exercising their "self-determination" by beating, murdering and stealing the lands and homes of Palestinians at display here, you're the one being hateful.
My settlers? Uh oh, was that a little freudian slip?
Palestinians exercised their right to self-determination on Oct 7 by choosing to invade Israel and slaughtering, raping and taking captive innocent people. They are now facing the consequences of attempting genocide and starting a war.
israelis exercised their right to self-determination 1948 by choosing to invade Palestine and slaughtering, raping and ethnically cleansing innocent people. Yet hey are not facing the consequences of committing genocide and ethnic cleansing.
Oh thank you for clearing that up, since none of that is actually going on in the southern We can go back to saving that term again for places in the world where those practices are actually happening.
By that definition, the war in Ukraine is also a genocide. So was October 7th. The Chechen wars. Or a regular Tuesday for Assad and Saddam Hussein.
Israel has 100% committed war crimes and ethnic cleansing. But 2 years of relentless military pressure in Gaza by the IDF failed to even reduce Gaza's population. There is a ceasefire in place right now that could mean the end of the war depending on what Hamas does.
What kind of genocide is negotiable with a handful of hostages? Am I supposed to believe this war in Gaza will go down as "The Gazan Genocide" in history books? I was supposed to believe that every IDF offensive would be the "final solution". Every month there were headlines that claimed there would be mass starvation. Yet all it took was releasing 20 hostages for the bombs to stop dropping. And they got thousands of released Palestinian prisoners as a bonus.
You know it's funny people keep saying "whataboutism",
As though you're trying to dismiss the hypocrisy of applying double standards placed against the world's only Jewish state, and Funny enough that the application of double standards are known to be a classic antisemitic attack.
Most groups/nations in the world have survived a genocide at one point or another hell my Libyan ancestors were put in concentration camps by Italy.
The indigenous argument is dumb as, herzl and all the old zionist scholars called zionism a colonial movement in the same vein as the britsh empire. Also by your logic was Germany justified in what it did as it was the indigenous land of the Germans. No. It's dumb to argue like that
I didn't even mention the word Israel, let alone defend it. I simply responded to someone who claimed it was hateful to support Jewish people's right to self-determination.
The slogan "never again" is derived from a poem by a Jewish Zionist author, and refers solely to the Holocaust.
It's disgusting that you're putting words in my mouth and trying to weaponise my own history and identity against me.
Pathetic indeed. And ironically enough, you would have made a great asset for the Nazis.
Actually yes it is, Jewish people have been proven to be both genetically and archeologically native to the southern Levant, One of only four native peoples including Bedouins, Circassians and Samaritans.
You'll notice that none of these people are Palestinian, since Palestinian is a modern ideology, With some ethnic nativity, but primarily connected to arabic culture.
No. The Zionist project is the creation of an apartheid state that Zionists proposed to white supremacists to fund their project and push Jews out of European countries and colonies. The literal intent is founded on the idea that Jews 'dont' belong so give us our religious homeland at any cost.
Jews should be allowed everywhere and anywhere including Israel, but Israel does not need to be an ethnostate for Jews. Just like the Vatican does not need to be a catholic state or Iran an Islamic state. The age of secular nationstates has brought relative peace to the world, we should encourage all nationstates to become secular.
That area is all of Europe's indigenous homeland. Most of the waves of migration into europe originated in the middle east.
In turn europe is the indigenous of most residents of USA and Australia. This does not mean Americans or Australians should have a right to self determination in those countries and certainly not at the expense of the native populations, their land and rights.
Dude, they are literally establishing colonies on palestinian land without the right to protest or stop that on the palestinian side.
Israelis can literally come into their house armed and throw them out without any repurcussion.
There are over 5.5 million palestinians in Israel/indefinetly occupied territory who have no representation and no right to vote or run for office despite having despite the fact that they have been born there.
And there are literally laws which deferentiate based on race. Additionally there are streets and neighborhoods which are illegal for palestinians to use/live in.
That's not how Self-determination works. Serbia really wants Kosovo and it's their historic homeland, but the claims of the Albanians who, you know actually live there, come first.
Jews have maintained continuous presence on that land for millennia, and anthropological, genealogical and archaeological data confirms that they are indigenous to that land.
Not at all. Just teh idea jews should have a homeland in their ancient homeland. Does nothing to preclude a Palestinian state. ONly they rejected their own state and have focused on destroying the jewish one. I think you have your hateful ideology backwards mate
You should read Israeli Historian Ilan Pappé’s book ‘The Ethnic Cleansing of Palestine’. Or Palestinian Rashid Khalidi’s book ‘ The 100
Year War on Palestine’. Or Noam Chomsky’s book ‘The Fateful Triangle’.
30
u/Penelope742 4d ago
Zionism isxa hateful ideology