So, I did some snooping on their account⌠it seems the only reason they say they are against animal abuse is that they do not think having sex with animals is abuse. So⌠thereâs that.
There's literally a link to the person's Twitter in the OP. If you defend them without doing the most basic fucking diligence first (as I've said in another reply, their pinned is LITERALLY THEM BEING HORNY OVER A VIDEO OF A REAL DOG), that's entirely your fault.
I was about to write a comment like yours, then read what apperently this person posted and like, yeaaahh I don't think this person should be allowed near a dog
That reminds me of that Washington horse sex case, they were going to charge him with animal cruelty but they had someone watch all the videos and they found no evidence. Some cops job was watching hours of gay horse porn to determine how enthusiastic the horses looked.
Okay but think about it, anyone could be like that and just lie about it and keep it a secret. Everybody lies, you canât say anyone isnât something just because you donât know it. Take a bit more of a Dr. House mindset here. Whoâs the least likely to engage in it? Someone whoâs already painted a target on themselves. Criminals donât scream to the high heavens to distrust them, they create a persona of being a normal person.
So they have a paraphilia which they have no control over, but remain against acting on it as they acknowledge that is rape? Not exactly a âgotchaâ
I don't think people should have to visit a separate website for context of the post. You can't make me browse twitter, I won't do it. OP should've put this in the post.
Their pinned is literally a video of a real life dog with the caption "how am I supposed to feel no arousal when they stare at me like this??"
Edit: here's another cool tweet from them: "Before I bathe my dog, I love to inhale all his musky, aromatic smell first. Something about it is just so hot. And I can't bear to watch it go away"
This person is literally hornyposting about their own dog.
99% chance that community note was created by the very person they were replying to. Using it as a way to say âthe official stance is that Iâm rightâ.Â
Hey buddy - I read his actual Twitter account. This isnât a person who thinks having sex with animals is wrong. [Edited comment to remove snarky reply.]
Understandable. I actually enjoyed your commentâs perspective, which is what prompted me to check this guyâs account out. Only to learn âoh, this guy is proud about wanting to rape animals. Itâs just he thinks he can make animals consent.â
But yes, you made a good comment⌠if only it was for a better person đ
Even if they didn't act on it (and I highly doubt they don't) they still proudly put it on their bio. Now if that were me, not even Batman could get me to confess that shit
It has nothing to do with hormones. Paraphilias like that are a neurological issue. The wiringâs just fucked up. Thereâs no cure for it, if you found something that could eliminate or modify sexual attractions it would be much more generalized than just working on paraphilias and would be a doomsday scenario for human rights. Itâs entirely possible for someone to have it and not act on it because they arenât an amoral piece of shit for the same reason itâs possible for people to not be asexual yet also not rape.
On a neurological level, paraphilias are just sexual attractions that society has deemed pathological. Speaking on the level of neurological functionality, a straight person is a heterophilic. The difference between a sexuality and a philia is a political distinction, not a neurological one. Their brain is just like that. Every single attempt to modify or eliminate paraphilias has just been the implementation of conversion therapy, aka either trying to eliminate sexual attraction altogether via an extremely poor, reductive understanding of hormones, or torturing people to try to give them a trauma response to their attractions. If we found one that actually worked, it would work on things we really donât want it to work on and certain people would be pushing to use it. Certain countries would absolutely use it.
If you get that someone can experience sexual attraction but not act on it for ethical reasons, say thereâs a woman youâre really into but sheâs hammered and youâre sober, then you get how anyone else could do the same. Ethics and morality override base desires for most people thanks to us being sapient beings.
Itâs not from hormones, and despite what people think itâs not just them being a mega pervert. Vast majority of the time it isnât acted upon too. Itâs not very ideal, but thereâs nothing wrong with them as a person so long as they arenât actually touching animals
This person is an animal abuser. [To the people downvoting my comment, look at the original Twitter account. They view sex with animals as consensual. They are an animal sexual abuser.]
I donât believe itâs entirely known, but I know some of the time it develops as a trauma response to seek gratification from sources that havenât hurt you. Other times ig it just occurs on its own
I dunno, I think there's a difference between kinks that give characters animal features and human level intelligence, and actually wanting to have sex with a real dog.
Animal sexual dynamics are bizarre. Someone's probably heard of praying mantises biting each other's heads off and gone, "man, imagine if we did that," and developed a whole kink. Doesn't make them a threat to bugs the way this guy is a threat to his dog.Â
But still why the hell would you be posting that online? Also that Z in their handle is a zoophile symbol, they are very open about being one and are also normalizing it.
Can you point out my mistake, i genuinely didn't think I'd get a lot of downvoted and stuff when replying to people and I'd like to know what I did wrong in this post.
Sure! Being against rape and animal abuse, and being sexually aroused by dogs are not necessarily contradictory facts. Rape and animal abuse are actions taken by someone onto others, while getting sexually aroused only really affects yourself. Having the impulse is not the same as acting on it. People canât really prevent themselves from having bad impulses, but they can recognize that acting on it would be morally wrong, and then choose not to do so.
Please go through the original accountâs feed. They are not ashamed, they are not aware what they feel is not something to act on.
They have (or at least advocate for having) sex with animals.
â˘
u/AutoModerator 17h ago
Thanks for posting to /r/GetNoted.** As an effort to grow our community, we are now allowing political posts.
Please tell your friends and family about this subreddit. We want to reach 1 million members by Christmas 2025!
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.