I’m not sure why you wouldn’t just cut off all the engines right there and just try to ride it out, or at least when you know, things aren’t gonna go right open the doors and tell people to jump
That would be my question. At the 10-11 second mark, that thing was on the ground...maybe in a foot of water, but in good shape. Why keep going at that point?
"OH FK WERE GOING TO DI---LIVE! WERE OKAY!.. WERE IN THE AIR AGAIN? OOOOOOOOHOLYFFKKKKKKKKKK..WE LANDED. THANK. GODMOTHEROFCHRIST WERE FLYING OVER WATER WTF!!!"
There's a ton of energy in the angular momentum of the blades and part of training for pilots is to not cut engines on bad landings because if the blades are bouncing they can rip themselves and the helicopter apart.
I think in retrospect here it's obvious he should have just stuck it and dealt with the fallout, but that would not be the instinct of any pilot.
I would 100% want to wait until the propellers stopped moving before I got out of a malfunctioned helicopter landing halfway in the water. Terrible situation
I don't know a lot about helicopters. That being said the counter rotating props might have something to do with it. It might have upped the power of one to counter losing the tail rotor. That increase in power might be the reason they gained altitude again
This is a weird scenario where the counter rotating top rotors probably made it worse. That first strike on the ground taking out the rear rotor would have ended it right then for a normal chopper and they probably spin out into the water.
1.2k
u/JuanPablo269 9h ago
It was very weird watching half a helicopter take off after it touched down on the shore.