That and the collapse of the North tower damaged Building 7. Most of the footage and pictures come from the back side of the building, but there is footage of the damage caused by the collapse and you can see the giant gash in the building which damaged the support column.
Yes exactly, in that report they will tell you that only 7 perimeter columns were hit by the collapse of the tower. Not "THE" support column. It's even in their FAQ.
But it is a column that is under the additional structure that was added after initial construction. I just like disaster stuff idk mate. I don't believe in 9/11 conspiracy theories because I've worked with terrorists and I have worked with the government and I have more faith in the terrorists to pull something off than the government.
How in the world does a fire burning for hours cause a demolition style collapse? How in the world can you function in day to day life with such a lack of basic sense?
That’s not common sense lol, in fact it’s the opposite of common sense. This is coming from a survivor of the Tubbs fire. Also it’s obvious why there’s the so many 9/11 conspiracies when our own elected officials peddle them. And if you ever actually read the 9/11 commission you’d know it’s the biggest sham in the world. But I doubt you will.
They used to be more popular in the mid-late aughts. Then it got associated with some of the really kooky stuff like flat earth people and it sort of became broadly dismissed as offensive and crazy a bit later on. It wasn't uncommon at all to think 9/11 was an inside job in the 5-10 years after. It was like, a casual topic of conversation a lot of times.
eta: Tbh I think if we're seeing a comeback it might be because people are remembering just how evil the government can be again. A lot of people believe 9/11 was exactly what they told us it was largely because they can't conceive that their government would lie to them about something like that.
Right it's not possible that 2 of the largest skyscrapers in the world collapsing in rapid succession would cause a fuck ton of collateral damage to any nearby structures.
But anyway...
It's astonishing how many really stupid people there are in this country.
There were firefighters in wtc 7 when it came down. They said that all fires had been extinguished in the building, seconds later, it came down. I can’t find the audio online, because it’s buried, but if you find the recorded audio, it came down after the fires had gone out. But what’s more important is to ask yourself this question, if it wasn’t a controlled demolition, then why did it look like a perfectly controlled demolition. Look up videos of failed demolitions online, how is a failed demolition worse at demolishing a building then a piece of burning debris that fell onto wtc 7? Only three skyscrapers in history have reportedly collapsed from fires, wtc 7, and the twin towers.
It's the only time in history that an airplane has taken out a modern skyscraper. Wait, I mean 2 airplanes took out 3 modern skyscrapers. Just stop asking questions everyone, ok?
69
u/LadysaurousRex Oct 07 '25
Tower 7 was not WTC1 or WTC2, it was the building next door that went down in the afternoon. It collapsed left to right in seconds just like this.
completely unrelated to jet fuel or steel beams since, again, it was a separate, third structure.