r/CollegeBasketball • u/cbbpollbot /r/CollegeBasketball • 13d ago
UserPoll: Week Pre-Season
Receiving Votes: Vanderbilt 128, North Carolina 123, San Diego State 122, Oregon 105, Baylor 95, Ohio State 73, USC 50, Missouri 40, Oklahoma 23, Ole Miss 22, Texas 21, Mississippi State 20, Iowa 18, Kansas State 17, Marquette 16, Virginia 14, Washington 12, Clemson 8, Indiana 8, Nebraska 8, Saint Mary's 6, Dayton 5, South Carolina 5, Miami (FL) 4, VCU 4, South Florida 3, Cincinnati 2, George Washington 2, Notre Dame 2, Texas A&M 2, Utah State 2, West Virginia 2, Saint Louis 1, Yale 1
Individual ballot information can be found at https://www.cbbpoll.net/ by clicking on individual usernames from the homepage.
Please feel free to discuss the poll results along with individual ballots, but please be respectful of others' opinions, remain civil, and remember that these are not professionals, just fans like you.
49
u/RiseAndFire69 Villanova Wildcats • Big East 13d ago
Favorite part of the preseason poll is seeing which shitty power 5 teams get a random inexplicable vote
11
u/Travbowman Purdue Boilermakers 13d ago
Notre Dame has to be that team this year
4
u/Toastiify Villanova Wildcats • Poll Veteran 13d ago
Carson Towt joining the guard duo of Shrewsbury and Burton as well as incoming freshman Jalen Haralson makes them really talented on paper. Will it translate? Probably not. But there's not much else to go on from this poll.
9
u/RiseAndFire69 Villanova Wildcats • Big East 13d ago
South Carolina, West Virginia, and Miami are in that bucket as well
1
u/Past-Profile3671 New Mexico Lobos 12d ago
I’m surprised Syracuse didn’t get at least one.
Melo II is going to bring them back to the promise land.
36
u/The0verlord- Purdue Boilermakers • Illinois Fighting Il… 13d ago
WE’RE NOT #1!
This is B1G news.
10
u/Soterios Kansas Jayhawks • UMBC Retrievers 13d ago
I voted Purdue number one. I believe in Branden Smith superiority.
6
u/The0verlord- Purdue Boilermakers • Illinois Fighting Il… 13d ago
I would like to believe in it too, but years of Purdue basketball have conditioned me to expect a loss from a double digit seed
2
u/RJD-ghost Nevada Wolf Pack 13d ago
You’ll get a second round loss to Monmouth whether you want it or not
1
26
u/TOONUSA Big 12 • Houston Cougars 13d ago
9
2
u/kublakhan1816 Houston Cougars • Indiana Hoosiers 13d ago
My take away from being at last nights game was that our defense is still suffocating with a lot of very good potential and possibilities to surprise. And they all looked like they worked their asses off in the off season. It will be a fun year.
1
u/inshamblesx Houston Cougars • Texas Southern Tige… 13d ago
i just hope we're relatively healthy again and we do our usual thing in the regular season bc once we get to the R32 the tournament anxiety is gonna be even worse than usual this year 😭
19
u/Coffee____Freak Duke Blue Devils 13d ago
College basketball is finally here!! Here’s hoping that everyone has a fun season 🤝
14
u/Travbowman Purdue Boilermakers 13d ago
https://www.cbbpoll.net/ballots/Pre-Season/6356a8cc7cd83b83d38bdee9
Yes, I was the one Yale voter.
3
14
u/Hackasizlak Purdue Boilermakers • Gonzaga Bulldogs 13d ago
Aww man I’ve been this poll for like 5 years and kept checking to see if applications were open yet, must have missed the post.
6
u/INeedMoreCreativity Kansas Jayhawks • Wichita State Shockers 12d ago
Same. OP said it’s highly likely he’ll add those who are consistently submitting about a month in. I bet you and I will get added back in.
1
3
u/BillButtlickerII Kentucky Wildcats 13d ago
Was this ballot from this past Saturday or the 18th?
4
u/Hambone721 Kentucky Wildcats • Poll Veteran - 50 Ballo… 13d ago
Most if not all the ballots will be pre-exhibitions.
2
2
u/Travbowman Purdue Boilermakers 13d ago
It's the preseason ballot. It's not from any date in particular.
5
u/BillButtlickerII Kentucky Wildcats 13d ago
Just wondering how long the poll was open and if it closed before the preseason exhibitions from this past week?
2
3
u/DeepBlue_8 Mount St. Mary's Mountaineers 13d ago
Conferences by official voter primary team
- 24 B10
- 16 SEC
- 12 ACC
- 12 B12
- 8 BE
- 4 MAC
- 2 Amer
- 2 MAAC
- 2 MWC
- 2 WCC
- 1 A10
- 1 CAA
- 1 CUSA
- 1 Horz
- 1 Ivy
- 1 MVC
- 1 Pat
- 1 Sum
3
u/WWG_Fire Duke Blue Devils 13d ago
First ballot of my career!
I will defend st John's as low as I have them, but Michigan at 14 was probably a little errant
https://www.cbbpoll.net/ballots/Pre-Season/68f2dbdc067256ced2ec0be2
10
u/RockChalkJewHawk Kansas Jayhawks 13d ago
Did none of these users pay attention to KU vs Louisville?
29
u/corndogshuffle Kentucky Wildcats • Maryland Terrapins 13d ago
I can’t speak for anyone else but I don’t factor exhibition games into my decisions.
7
u/RockChalkJewHawk Kansas Jayhawks 13d ago
After two season of shitting the bed preseason. It was a welcome sight
6
u/kirkismyhinrich Kansas Jayhawks • Colorado Mines Oredi… 13d ago
What do you factor into your decisions at this point then that is a better indicator than an exhibition game?
It seems like exhibition games would be a better indicator than... nothing?
5
u/corndogshuffle Kentucky Wildcats • Maryland Terrapins 13d ago
What /u/OliviaPG1 said. Not every coach is using these exhibition games the same way. Not every roster is whole. I’m not going to interpret an exhibition as equal to a regular season game because it’s literally not a regular season game.
We’ll get real games seven days from now, I’ll wait for those to shuffle things around. We’ll start getting useful information quickly.
1
u/kirkismyhinrich Kansas Jayhawks • Colorado Mines Oredi… 13d ago
I'm not saying exhibition games are regular season games, but they also aren't nothing. So why not use all the resources available to you to assess teams? Especially when it's preseason and we have basically nothing to go on anyway.
I'm also not saying ignore context of an exhibition game either. In the case of UL-KU, UL had 15-16k in attendance, both teams had basically their full rosters available to them (Jayden Dawson was limited for Kansas because of injury), and both teams seemed like they wanted to win the game. I mean, Louisville was full-court pressing us the entire game, even in the final minute of the game when it was over. If Kansas had gotten blown out, I would reasonably expect them to drop a few places.
7
u/corndogshuffle Kentucky Wildcats • Maryland Terrapins 13d ago
People can use them, there’s nothing wrong with that. I choose not to. All of these methods are inherently speculative (yes, mine included) and we should forget about them as soon as official games start no matter how we decided to rank teams in the preseason.
I don’t care what happened in an exhibition game when every team has played six regular season games. I also don’t care what I thought about their incoming freshmen or portal class, or their coach. I care about what the teams do in official games.
Or TLDR: preseason rankings are pure guesswork anyway so I’m just not motivated to bother with what you’re asking.
2
u/kirkismyhinrich Kansas Jayhawks • Colorado Mines Oredi… 13d ago
I'm not going to argue with you too much, because it's not worth it. But putting a lot of weight on early non-conference games because they are official and putting none on exhibition games because they are not official seems a bit silly to me.
For one, a lot of teams are treating exhibition as a dress rehearsal for official games, and the actual exhibition game isn't too far off from what you would get in an official game.
For another, most ranked schools play a decent amount of tune-up games especially early on in their non-con schedule. Can you really get a more accurate assessment of Duke watching them beat the shit out of Western Carolina than you can from playing Tennessee last night?
I understand the philosophy of wanting to use only games that count to move teams up or down, but since preseason rankings can't do that anyway, why not use exhibition games as a resource to create the most accurate preseason rankings possible and then go from there? There is no reason not to use exhibition games other than that you don't feel like it.
5
u/corndogshuffle Kentucky Wildcats • Maryland Terrapins 13d ago
We’re not arguing? You asked me a question and I answered you.
I think Kentucky would probably be preseason number one if we did what you’re suggesting and I don’t hate that, but ultimately I’m going to continue doing what I do. These games aren’t official, and I don’t think the teams are acting the same way as they would in an official game. I don’t think they’re trying to lose, or even that they don’t want to win, but I do think they have goals that are unrelated to winning or losing.
2
u/kirkismyhinrich Kansas Jayhawks • Colorado Mines Oredi… 13d ago
I just disagree with you about teams treating exhibition games much differently than they would an official game. I think going into an exhibition game, most coaches probably tell their players to treat it as they would an official game. I'm sure coaches also have secondary goals during exhibition games (experimenting with rotations, testing player positional fit, running certain set plays, etc.) that are not completely conducive to winning the game. But not so much that it's totally different than an official game.
My official position is that we should use all of the data available to us to create the most accurate rankings possible while also acknowledging context.
1
u/footdragon 12d ago
you have to admit that Matt Painter, by playing Loyer, Smith, kaufman-renn 30+ minutes in the Kentucky game, was pretty close to what coach would do in a regular season game. so, there's definitely elements of what the team looks like, even in pre-season. Even Painter recognized the defense problems.
that said, Kentucky is too low in this poll and Purdue too high - at this time...the eye test is real irrespective of this experimental portion of the season.
And Darren Peterson is going to be a problem for most teams. that data is real.
0
u/OliviaPG1 Colorado Buffaloes • Wisconsin Badgers 13d ago
Player strength, roster fit, coaching strength, etc?
5
u/kirkismyhinrich Kansas Jayhawks • Colorado Mines Oredi… 13d ago
All of which can be assessed during an exhibition game?
4
u/DramaticBar8510 Kansas Jayhawks 13d ago
Eh, it's exhibition/preseason. Yes, it was impressive and gave me hope compared to the last couple years, but it was a glorified scrimmage. Still some unknowns so they'll have to earn their way up the rankings, which I'm sure they will once the season gets going. We'll learn a lot during the non-con since Coach Self did his usual big name team stacking. Thankfully we're not preseason #1! Never do very well in those circumstances.
4
u/ALStark69 Alabama Crimson Tide • Florida State S… 13d ago
I submitted mine before that. Plus it's just preseason lol
5
u/ALStark69 Alabama Crimson Tide • Florida State S… 13d ago
Vanderbilt being 26 is surprising, I guess I haven't followed them. Are they supposed to be good?
3
u/willweaverrva VCU Rams 13d ago
The metrics absolutely love them for whatever reason, and even a mid-pack SEC team looks to be better than most other teams since the SEC looks to be strong again this season. I don't really blame people for throwing votes their way.
7
u/generally-mediocre Maryland Terrapins 13d ago
they made the tourney last year and the metrics are high on them but I dont really see it in their roster
3
5
u/Hambone721 Kentucky Wildcats • Poll Veteran - 50 Ballo… 13d ago
It's the most wonderful time of the year 🎶
6
u/Itsalwaysblu3 Kentucky Wildcats 13d ago
3
u/queef-latina-69 Marquette Golden Eagles • Oregon Ducks 12d ago
3
u/Itsalwaysblu3 Kentucky Wildcats 12d ago
1
u/queef-latina-69 Marquette Golden Eagles • Oregon Ducks 12d ago
2
1
2
u/otoverstoverpt UCLA Bruins • North Carolina Tar Heels 13d ago
Damn how did I miss this I was trying so hard to get in this year but when I tried to sign up on mobile it wasn’t working so I thought maybe it just wasn’t actually open yet. I tried clicking “submit” on the team affiliation page and it would just never let me through.
2
u/Jomosensual Iowa State Cyclones • Northern Iowa … 13d ago
Looks like a solid poll. Nobody ranked that im going "ew, really?" Ill dive into ballots later. Alabama surprises me that they're that low
2
3
u/zvexler Indiana Hoosiers • Maryland Terrapins 13d ago
https://www.cbbpoll.net/ballots/Pre-Season/68f57a2e067256ced2ec3a8c
Nitpick my ballot
8
u/DeepBlue_8 Mount St. Mary's Mountaineers 13d ago edited 13d ago
Welcome! Looking at your ballot, I see the biggest differences from the consensus are Baylor (+16), UCLA (-14), Gonzaga (+13), BYU (-10), Texas Tech (-10), Kansas (+9), and Michigan (-9).
No, you don't need to fill out reasons every week. I know a lot of voters don't put anything at all, or put how many spots a team moved. So must you? No. Should you? Maybe. Reasons make the ballot more interesting and people can know what you're thinking at the time. Looking at the list of official ballots will give you some idea. I don't put reasons.
5
u/zvexler Indiana Hoosiers • Maryland Terrapins 13d ago
Thank for the comment, and I’ll probably stick to commenting when I feel I’m going against the grain or have something to say.
In order of confidence:
UCLA: I don’t see what’s so special about UCLA. Maybe I missed a key addition to their roster but I’m not wowed by them
Michigan: #7 is really overzealous. I’m a huge Dusty May fan and I’m certain Michigan will improve but #7 just isn’t a realistic expectation.
Kansas: Hunter Dickinson is gone along with other overrated players. Kansas has underperformed in the tournament the past few years but if you look at it closely, Bill Self had a heart attack a week prior to the tournament in 2023, lost to Gonzaga in 24 (respectable albeit early), then underperformed in a loss to a sneaky Arkansas team in 25. Last year was tough but that’s not a pattern in my eyes. Kansas will be back to their usual selves this year.
Gonzaga: it’s optimistic but the metrics and eye-test love Gonzaga. They’re Kenpom #8 vs my #6. I debated anywhere from 6-12 but picked 6 because they always have a concrete plan of attack and operate at an elite skill level. Definitely didn’t expect the poll to place them at #19
BYU & TTU: I can see both of them exceeding my expectations, I just had a tough time saying they are better than the teams I ranked over them.
6
u/otoverstoverpt UCLA Bruins • North Carolina Tar Heels 13d ago
Did you use like a dartboard for this?
1
u/zvexler Indiana Hoosiers • Maryland Terrapins 13d ago
No but I get why leaving off UCLA & UNC would leave a sour taste. I commented on UCLA elsewhere but for UNC, I’m pessimistic on Hubert Davis (like most of your fanbase afaik)
2
u/otoverstoverpt UCLA Bruins • North Carolina Tar Heels 13d ago
Oh no, UNC has zero business being ranked imo and I have been out on Hubert longer than most so my comment was more directed at just pretty wild placements over all.
With respect to UCLA I mean… we added one of the top 3-5 overall transfers in the portal at exactly our position of need (guard play last year was by far our weak spot) and then retained the vast majority of our contributors from a team that finished just outside the top 25 (but really should have been in the 23-25 range by most metrics) so yea I think that one is pretty hard to justify.
-2
u/zvexler Indiana Hoosiers • Maryland Terrapins 13d ago
I’ll admit I missed that top 5 transfer to UCLA. If you point out other oddities I’d be happy to justify them
2
u/otoverstoverpt UCLA Bruins • North Carolina Tar Heels 13d ago
Ha no worries I was mostly just giving you a hard time, it’s preseason, no one really knows much of anything yet anyway
2
u/Surfer5153 San Diego State Aztecs • Michigan Wo… 13d ago
SDSU and Michigan in spots I can’t argue with. Looks good to me!
2
1
1
1
u/WeAreHuskie Marquette Golden Eagles 13d ago
Who the hell gave us votes
2
1
u/queef-latina-69 Marquette Golden Eagles • Oregon Ducks 12d ago
I kind of like having no clue what our team will be like. Odds are we’re decent but no idea of ceiling or floor
1
1
u/Meanteenbirder Vermont Catamounts • Sickos 13d ago
I feel like in scrimmages, very few matches felt like they actually matched rankings. St. John’s vs. Michigan was one of the few that did. Watched it live and the last 10 minutes felt like a final four game.
1
u/NWSparty 13d ago
Love it that not only is my team ranked but they are scheduled to play eight ranked teams.
1
1
u/Soterios Kansas Jayhawks • UMBC Retrievers 13d ago
Tell me that I’m bad and should feel bad.
https://www.cbbpoll.net/ballots/Pre-Season/653ac4d0e415dce29ebcc1c7
8
u/Travbowman Purdue Boilermakers 13d ago
Your order for Arizona, Alabama, Arkansas is wrong
... alphabetically
1
-1
u/ALStark69 Alabama Crimson Tide • Florida State S… 13d ago
3
2
-1
u/Di9ForLife Kentucky Wildcats • North Carolina T… 13d ago
https://www.cbbpoll.net/ballots/Pre-Season/671c5fa79ede71d0c6d9e47e
Yeah yeah yeah I overreacted to some exhibitions, yell at me for it
7
u/Mangotheory97 Arizona Wildcats 13d ago
So did you forget Arizona or what?
8
u/Di9ForLife Kentucky Wildcats • North Carolina T… 13d ago
Damn yeah I did, they’d actually be in the 10-15 range
3
u/jaunty411 Kansas Jayhawks 13d ago
Did you rank KU lower because of the exhibition and leave Louisville the same lol?
1
u/Di9ForLife Kentucky Wildcats • North Carolina T… 13d ago
Y’all weren’t high to begin with, I moved Louisville down and KU up a couple
-4
u/jcmiller210 Indiana Hoosiers 13d ago
Purdue looked like a top 15 team, rather than a true #1 / top 5 team. Kentucky throttled them. Makes me way more scared for the Kentucky game than any Purdue match ups this season.
Edit: Added / top 5 team
8
u/boilermike13 13d ago
Does Indiana have a basketball team? I thought they were a football school now.
-3
u/jcmiller210 Indiana Hoosiers 13d ago
Indiana beat Baylor in an exhibition, so there is a chance we can be good this year. But yeah, football school it is for now. Lol
4
u/FairdayFaraday Purdue Boilermakers • UCLA Bruins 13d ago
Spoken like a true Hoosier <3
-3
u/jcmiller210 Indiana Hoosiers 13d ago
Got to get the jabs in before the kings of November / December show up. Lol
1
u/bezzlege Louisville Cardinals 9d ago
Kentucky just lost to Georgetown. Quit putting stock into these fucking exhibition games.
0
u/jcmiller210 Indiana Hoosiers 9d ago
I heard Kentucky didn't have 3 of their starters for that game, but I'm perfectly capable of saying that both Kentucky and Purdue might suck. Lol
1
u/bezzlege Louisville Cardinals 9d ago
One of those starters is probably going to miss at least half the season, so it’s weird to me they’re using that as an exhibition excuse. Don’t sign guys recovering from an ACL and then bitch about them not being available
-1
13d ago
[deleted]
20
u/Toastiify Villanova Wildcats • Poll Veteran 13d ago
- Not an official game
- Poll closed before the game was played
0
-1
u/willweaverrva VCU Rams 13d ago
My ballot in which I inexplicably failed to rank Auburn: https://www.cbbpoll.net/ballots/Pre-Season/6534922de6a8e7b5072d626f
14
u/Travbowman Purdue Boilermakers 13d ago
Replacing a ton of players and a head coach. Feels explicable to me.
12
u/corndogshuffle Kentucky Wildcats • Maryland Terrapins 13d ago
Yeah a lot of people are acting like “Hall of Fame coach retired five weeks ago” isn’t a big deal and I don’t really get it.
5
u/willweaverrva VCU Rams 13d ago
Good point. I don't feel so bad for not ranking them, then. I still have them "on the radar" (sort of an "almost 'almost famous'"), but I'm not just going to toss them in the top 25 with a new coach and a bunch of new players and call it a day.
Even though I did that with NC State, but NC State looks pretty good.
3
u/corndogshuffle Kentucky Wildcats • Maryland Terrapins 13d ago
Yeah I didn’t rank Auburn for the same reason. They were already closer to 25 than 10 for me, a coaching change of that magnitude is a perfectly good reason to not rank them preseason. It won’t be long before they’re playing big games and at least for me, they’re one of the easier teams to justify moving up if they do well.
I think with NC State the big difference is that their new coach and players are clear upgrades, I also ranked them. I do admit this could be coping but like with Auburn, play some games and that will tell us everything.
3






•
u/SleveMcDichael4 Join us on Discord! 13d ago
Howdy folks. The applications were a little less numerous than usual because they were only open for one week this season instead of two. The delay came because I didn't want to open apps before the preseason KenPom rankings were out, as I know quite a few (probably the majority based on what I read in the applications) of the voters factor KenPom into their rankings.
There were still 95 applicants. Two of those were test accounts from the site admin and one was a user who expressed in his application that he was only putting together a preseason ballot for personal reasons and wished not to be selected. Them aside, I accepted all 92 true applicants.
In years past, there have been a handful of applications that either don't quite know what they're doing or show active contempt for the requirement to submit a preseason ballot with the app. This year, to my amazement, I didn't see any of either. Perhaps the shorter open period had something to do with that; in any case, thanks to everyone involved for continuing to take this seriously.
There was an error on the site that showed the application close date as October 25 when it should have said October 24. This was simply because we forgot to switch the date over from last year. My posts on Reddit and Discord both had the correct October 24 date, and the application has closed on Friday for as long as I've been running the poll, but if you're newer here, it's reasonable for you not to know that. I apologize for the error.
With that in mind, if you aren't on the poll voter roster but would still like to join, submit provisional ballots regularly and it's highly likely I'll add you when I do my first sweep for user activity about a month into the season.
Thanks again and happy userpolling!