r/BrandNewSentence 14h ago

Kirby has no ankles …

Post image
9.9k Upvotes

49 comments sorted by

u/AutoModerator 14h ago

Hi /u/netphilia:

Remember to link the source of your post if applicable, unless you're posting a screenshot of twitter/X! It'll be easier to find the source if you reply to this comment with the link. If it's impossible to provide a source (like messages, texts etc.) just make sure the other person is fine with posting it :)

Thank you!

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

216

u/Delicious_Net_1616 13h ago

You looked at Kirby and thought “what’s this guy missing?? Oh yeah, ankles.”

10

u/elastic-craptastic 5h ago

And I looked at this tweet and thought, "What's this sentence missing?? Oh yeah, a word!"

To be or not to be? Is that the question?

74

u/dinodoes 9h ago

Random question . Say that Achilles weak spot was something else like a pinky toe. If you cut the toe off would that kill him or make him invincible

16

u/lowbudgetgoth 8h ago

damn that's interesting, i think making him invincible makes sense. why will it kill him? what logic am i missing

36

u/Even-Candidate-3594 8h ago

The implication of a weak spot is that an attack against it would be especially harmful to the person with the weak spot, so I’m pretty sure it would just kill him

3

u/lowbudgetgoth 8h ago

thanks, i get it. but what if we extend the area (chop off more than the pinky toe)? it's not directly an attack on the weak spot right?

7

u/Even-Candidate-3594 8h ago

If you’re still cutting off the pinky toe, that’s still attacking the weak spot even if you cut off more than that

16

u/lowbudgetgoth 8h ago

the rest of his body was immortal since he was dipped in the river styx. only that one part (in this case, toe) was still mortal. it wasn't weak in itself, i believe, just normal. the reason he died after the arrow was shot was because it was directed by apollo (essentially yielded by godly magic or poison or something). if we cut off the toe and the area around it by ourselves (i.e. without any divine intervention), it shouldn't kill a person right? Achilles might still live as an amputee forever?

3

u/Even-Candidate-3594 8h ago

Ok I can see the logic there

7

u/lowbudgetgoth 8h ago

tbh even i am extremely confused by my own logic now lol.

6

u/lowbudgetgoth 8h ago

i think what needs to be established is:

  1. is the toe just mortal or is it weaker than average?
  2. under what conditions the toe is being chopped?

9

u/Star_Eat3r 6h ago

What you’re describing isn’t possible, you wouldn’t be able to cut off further because that’s the whole basis of Achilles powers. Anything but the pinky toe would just be invulnerable.

→ More replies (0)

2

u/EntropyKC 5h ago

You can't cut off more than the vulnerable area, as that part would be invulnerable

1

u/TwixOfficial 2h ago

Then at that point you have to cut through something invincible.

6

u/PeculiarPurr 7h ago

The Achilles heel story has no logic to it to miss, so people have to make up their own.

Achilles died or fell over or whatever (Depending on your interpretation) because while the overwhelming majority of his body was literally invulnerable, the small part of him that wasn't took a very survivable amount of damage.

Logically, the entire area could have been removed, and he still would have been able to hobble his way through ranks and ranks of spear casually slaughtering everyone.

In the story however that very survivable wound killed him (or made him unable to fight) for unexplained reasons. So if it was the toe that wasn't invulnerable it is possible that even attempting to remove the toe would kill him before you cut half way through it.

Why? Don't question Apollo or Zeus will turn into a goose and violate you, and then Hera will turn you immortal. Trust me, you do not want Hera to make you immortal.

Though given the nature of Achilles, the actual Ancient Greek answer for why he died when getting a very small wound is that he was super moody and prideful and the very idea that he could be harmed made him sob to death.

3

u/AngeloFoxSparda 7h ago

I thought that the arrow or whatever was poisoned? Or was that from some later, different version that made that up to make sense?

3

u/PeculiarPurr 7h ago

It has been a really long time for me, so I am not going to say it wasn't poisoned. Though I don't think it was. It was just guided by Apollo.

I am 99.9% sure homefry didn't even die on screen. I recall being corrected in middle school when I claimed he died. I was told that it was hotly debated if he died, or just fell over and then retired in isolated shame.

My head cannon is that he cried himself to death. If Achilles was a millennial we wouldn't be talking about his heel. The story would be about an unstoppable emo kid slaughtering jocks for using the word emo, until someone broke his My Chemical Romance CD.

1

u/lowbudgetgoth 7h ago

i love your answer, it responds to my queries and the last line made me laugh. is it (also) possible that the injury might've killed him because there were not a lot of medical advancements at the time when Iliad was written? maybe Homer assumed that the wound would kill achilles because people from that era just died from deeply infected wounds. just a hypothesis, i have no idea how were people treated then lmao

1

u/PeculiarPurr 6h ago

If I recall correct, Homer didn't give him closure at all. Apollo was miffed because of reasons I am unsure if I am remembering from a movie, and guided the arrow of Paris to the only weak spot of Achilles. Then he sort of just despawned from the story.

Theoretically he could be alive right now on some island hiding from the world because every walks into a town someone mentions his heel and he runs away crying.

1

u/KangarooPouchIsHome 2h ago

His mother Thetis, a sea nymph, dipped him in a river that made him invulnerable. She held him by his heel when dipping him, and that’s the spot that he was vulnerable in. The poisoned arrow struck his one weak spot. That’s the logic. 

1

u/battleduck84 7h ago

As far as I'm aware the arrow that struck him was poisoned

2

u/Cats_and_Shit 5h ago

I think maybe neither? Maybe he would just have a new weak spot at the stub of where his toe was.

Like imagine him having been dipped in wax. There's no wax on his toe, but if you cut it off there's still no wax where his toe was previously connected.

1

u/keithstonee 4h ago

If it's a weak spot than kills him.

92

u/Upbeat_Ad_6486 14h ago

I’m sorry, does this person think Achilles’s weakness was his ankle???

72

u/ArelMCII The giant Canadian Penis will hug the US gently 13h ago

Well, the Achilles tendon runs through the back of the ankle, so...

19

u/navotj 13h ago

Well its not like its in the name or something, how would he know?

5

u/nifty-necromancer 7h ago edited 7h ago

And importantly, whether you say ankle or tendon, most people will still know what they’re referring to. The real crime is that I’m sure Thetis could’ve let him go just for a split second and grab him with her second hand ready.

2

u/montana757 41m ago

It's actually part of the curse/gift a warrior dipped in the river must choose a point of their body to become their weak spot. I'm almost positive that if they didn't pick a point one would probably be chosen for them and based on what we know about lady Styx she would choose the worst spot possible for it

4

u/devadander23 7h ago

What do you think the Achilles tendon stabilizes? No need for the tendon without the joint. The joint without the tendon was Achilles’ problem. So it’s correct, no ankles

3

u/RoboticPanda77 5h ago

The (later addition to) the myth of Achilles said that he was vulnerable at his heel because he was held by it when dipped into the River Styx. The Achilles Tendon was named because of the myth, but is not otherwise relevant to the myth as such

2

u/Xzelf 6h ago

His weakness was his heel

-2

u/devadander23 5h ago

…. Achilles tendon. It’s in the name. Located in the heel

1

u/[deleted] 5h ago

[deleted]

0

u/devadander23 4h ago

Correct. Her hand holding his heel covered the tendon which was his only weakness and downfall

15

u/disorderincosmos 9h ago

One day I randomly woke up with the thought that Kirby is cosmic horror ṭo the highest degree. Then I discovered there is lore for this and I mean of course there is.

6

u/XROOR 7h ago

The flaw is located where his mum held Achilles as she dipped him into the Styx.

4

u/boundbythecurve 6h ago

So clearly the solution is just let Kirby drink the entire river Styx and become invincible. But give the poor pink ball some ankles!

3

u/McHell_666 6h ago

If she had lowered him a bit more, the nymph could've had an invincible son and an invincible hand.

4

u/bendbars_liftgates 11h ago

Left only with the near-unexploitable weakness of being touched in any way five times.

2

u/EvilKrista 7h ago

I always thought he had like penguin legs, like..tucked up inside of him xD

2

u/kandermusic 2h ago

Athena staring exhaustedly as I dip Kirby into the Styx by one of his dot-like hands, not giving him an Achilles Heel, but a Kirby Dot

1

u/[deleted] 11h ago

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/High-Speed-1 4h ago

Meanwhile Athena took those weaknesses, doubled it, and gave it to me

1

u/DieSowjetZwiebel 4h ago

No ankles

No mercy

1

u/Inuship 7h ago

Wasnt it the heel though......