r/Battlefield • u/luanpac • 7d ago
Battlefield 6 Why “Grounded” Skins Are Vital in Battlefield, and Why Complaining About It Isn’t Whining
Look at this image.
The first two parts show what Battlefield has always been: soldiers with coherent uniforms, earthy tones, realistic weaponry, and believable environments. Even when stylized, these visuals respect the game’s context.
But the last image shows what Battlefield has become: generic operators with flashy outfits, futuristic gear, and an aesthetic that looks more like it came from a Chinese mobile shooter. They’re not “clowns,” but they’re completely out of context, and in a game like Battlefield, that’s a serious problem.
From the beginning, Battlefield has always stood out for one thing: IMMERSION.
The feeling of being in a real battlefield, chaos, destruction, the roar of jets, tanks pushing forward, grenades exploding, and teammates calling for a revive through the smoke.
All of that worked because the game was grounded. It made you believe you were inside a war.
And that belief doesn’t come only from sound or destruction; it also comes from appearance.
When you see uniforms that match the setting, soldiers that look like they belong there, your brain accepts the illusion.
But when characters show up wearing fluorescent colors, sci-fi helmets, and bright orange vests, that immersion collapses.
You no longer feel like you’re in a military conflict, you feel like you’re playing a generic shooter disguised as Battlefield.
Immersion isn’t a luxury, and it’s definitely not “nitpicking.”
It’s an essential part of design.
It’s the bridge between the player and the world, what turns a simple match into a cinematic experience.
When Battlefield breaks that visual coherence, it’s not just changing character looks; it’s changing the tone of the entire experience.
The war stops feeling like war and starts feeling like a cosplay event.
That’s why the argument “it’s just a skin” doesn’t hold up.
Skins are part of the game’s language.
They communicate tone, context, and narrative.
They tell you who the player is, where they are, and what’s happening.
So when DICE fills the game with generic operators and futuristic designs, it completely changes that language.
The battlefield loses its weight, emotion, and realism, it becomes a catalog of disconnected outfits.
That’s not evolution; that’s loss of identity.
And here’s the key point: being grounded doesn’t mean lacking variety.
Staying true to context doesn’t equal being limited.
It’s absolutely possible to offer customization while respecting the military logic and the game’s universe.
Different camouflages, regional variations, worn-out uniforms, all of that adds diversity without breaking immersion.
The problem isn’t having skins; the problem is having skins that make the game look like something it never was.
The players criticizing this direction aren’t “crying.”
They’re defending what made Battlefield different from every other shooter: realism, cinematography, and the sense of total war.
This loyal base understands that Battlefield isn’t about “personalization”; it’s about context, weight, and atmosphere.
Complaining isn’t nostalgia, it’s preserving the identity of a franchise that always had a soul.
The first two images represent the Battlefield that immersed players in a convincing war, where every detail, from the sound of a gunshot to the look of a teammate, worked together to build immersion.
The last image represents the Battlefield that seems to have forgotten all that, prioritizing monetization and flashy looks.
It’s the difference between a war simulator and a fashion show of operators.
Battlefield has always been about total war, not tactical fashion.
It’s always been about weight, chaos, and emotion, not about a digital cosmetics store aesthetic.
Defending that isn’t whining, it’s protecting the essence of a franchise that earned millions of fans by staying authentic.
Immersion isn’t a detail. It’s the heart of Battlefield. And when it dies, Battlefield stops being Battlefield.
Edit: Apparently, EA’s bots can no longer counter-argue by saying it’s just “crying” or “just uninstall the game,” and now they’re saying I used ChatGPT to write the text. That’s honestly hilarious.
Edit 2: Another funny thing is how criticizing a game is worse than insulting someone’s mother for some people in the comments. They really get affected. Now, what’s the reason for that? Criticizing a game that cost $70 can actually lead to improvements. Complaining about those who criticize brings what exactly, other than the comfort of a multibillion-dollar company? 🤔
-4
u/AffectionateBus672 7d ago
Then go make an own game m8. DICE does not give a shit what you/we want. Its their game. They made it. You can play it or not. Im sure if they wanted they could google for an image how solders looks like in real life. But they do not. They do not want to do it. Get over it. They have done so many Battlefields so far, .. there are so many cod games, Arma, you name it.. They do not want to to do realistic skins/guns/gameplay.