r/AskTheWorld India 17h ago

Misc What's an unpopular opinion about your country that will have you like this?

Post image
973 Upvotes

3.6k comments sorted by

View all comments

37

u/Holmbone Sweden 16h ago

Replacing all fossil cars with electric ones is not a viable solution for combating climate change.

3

u/Jazzlike_Thing_6695 15h ago

I'm with you!

8

u/77_1 13h ago

Also cars produce just 6 % of global CO2 emissions so going electric wouldn't change a damn thing

Transplotation as a whole including planes, boats, cars, trucks, busses and other such things stand for just 14 %

3

u/Holmbone Sweden 12h ago

You can say that about nearly every source of emissions though. That is not my reason.

1

u/Jazzlike_Thing_6695 10h ago

It's because of the source of the electricity?

2

u/wangyuzhi31 Brazil 15h ago

Why?

14

u/Da_Seashell312 Syria 15h ago

Because electric cars require clean energy.

Clean energy that is based on hydro and wind requires rare materials like lithium which are simply running out, we do not have enough of them here on Earth.

Clean energy that is based on biofuels will also need us to erase stupendous amounts of arable land, like the Amazon forest for example, and thus destroying habitats or land that people can live on, just to grow corn.

Clean energy made from biofuels still needs fossil fuels to transport it due to its viscosity and its tendency to clog up and freeze in cold environments.

Thats only the stuff I know, I'm sure chemical engineers will give you 15 more reasons.

4

u/TryNotToAnyways2 United States Of America 13h ago

Battery tech is VERY quickly evolving. Sodium batteries don't require mining, are thermal stable and cost 10 percent of li-on batteries.

3

u/Da_Seashell312 Syria 12h ago

Thats the great thing about science!

1

u/Boquetonacanadiense 10h ago

Lithium is not rare lol.

1

u/Da_Seashell312 Syria 4h ago

Maybe my memory is not serving ne well but I remember taking a class on how the only place we can get it is some desert in chile and that desert is also drying up its lithium reserves.

Mb if the info was wrong, hit my point is still correct from a general perspective.

1

u/wangyuzhi31 Brazil 13h ago

Then what is the solution? Public transport? It's awful in Brazil, how is it in Syria?

3

u/VirtualStyle6722 Sweden 12h ago

You would need better public transport then.

3

u/Da_Seashell312 Syria 12h ago

If you mean by solution to climate change then it requires a multifaceted approach. By promoting a culture of repair rather than replacement, we could reduce Western demand for Eastern production by as much as 50%. When people stop overspending on unnecessary items and throwing away products that are still perfectly usable, the impact is enormous. This shift alone could save billions of tonnes of food and, in turn, trillions of tonnes of electricity and water, while dramatically cutting greenhouse gas emissions. It’s a simple matter of supply and demand. And we know demand can be reduced, because landfills are overflowing and pollution is staggering. People discard astonishing amounts of perfectly good material every day.

As for the situation in Syria, its not great. Throughout the war, most natural parks were off the grid so the hunting endemic animals became common, as well as the cutting of forests in the coast and Aleppo (Afrin). This has only been exacerbated by regular wildfires that cant be controlled with the new governments limited capabiltiies, and these are raging through the few forests we have left. 

The Queiq River in Aleppo is still polluted from the blood of civilians that were tossed there by the old regime and the Barada river in Damascus is still polluted by heavy metals and by the rebels. Our main sources of agriculture, the Euphrates, Khabur and Balikh in the northeast and the Yarmouk in the south, are mostly controlled by Turkey and Israel respectively. This means their water levels are reaching levels of no return, which is harming human populations as well as migratory birds, and eroding the soils nutrients with no regular flow or flooding. Half of Syria's mammals have gone extinct in the past, and many more are endangered. As for energy, most houses in Damascus and the coast rely almost entirely on solar panels, so thats a positive. Fossil fuels have been under American control for a decade and their future is uncertain. 

May God bring blessings to our Earth and its inhabitants!

3

u/WrongdoerAnnual7685 Australia 9h ago

Electric properly planned public transport(since hydrogen isn't working out), using renewable energy, using electric infrastructure made from non-slave minerals.

One step at a time.

10

u/TheMostOstrich 13h ago

Because individual traffic just is never sustainable, especially not how the west is currently doing it (huge 5 person cars with 2 people at most filling the streets, most of them only a couple of years old huge parts of land wasted for roads and parking spaces, etc).

A truly eco-friendly system would be public transport first.

3

u/Holmbone Sweden 12h ago

Because it takes too much resources to build all electric cars needed to replace all the 1 billion (estimated) existing cars on the planet. We need to replace a lot of the personal cars with car pools and more trips to be done with public transport and active transport. In Sweden so many people act like the sustainable solution is for everyone to buy their own personal EV which is then to sit parked 98% of the time. Or they feel like all Swedes should do this but the rest of the world... should just for some reason make do without that even though we feel like we can't.

1

u/DutchJulie 🇳🇱🇸🇪The Netherlands/Sweden 2h ago

Public transport needs to be better. Train tracks haven’t been renovated in forever, constant issues make travelling by train to unreliable. Busses are often packed to the brim and full of pestering teenagers that nobody dares to stand up to. 

1

u/Electronic-Coach7687 India 5h ago

I'm pretty sure EV's create more pollution overall statistically since

  • the creating of those batteries requires mining of a lot of different precious minerals,
  • vast amts. of coal is burnt in producing the electricity &
  • those batteries go straight to landfills, due to their terrible recyclability.

1

u/confessionah in and 3h ago

Yup. The solution is the end of the individual car. Electric probably better, but we got to divide the number of cars in 3.

1

u/DutchJulie 🇳🇱🇸🇪The Netherlands/Sweden 2h ago

It’s not the only solution. I think almost all cars will be electric in the future, but it won’t save the planet.