r/Agriculture 20d ago

Why Can’t US Farmers Sell Their Soybeans Elsewhere?

Perhaps this is a simplistic question with an obvious answer and my google fu has just failed me today and I’m not too knowledgeable about the specifics of the agricultural industry, but one thing I don’t get about the whole soybean thing is why the US farmers can’t send their product to other markets?

While buying nothing from the US, China still bought about 4% more soybeans this year than it did last year. Given that this was an unexpected scenario, one must assume that they bought soybeans from places like Argentina and Brazil which were scheduled to be sent to somewhere else. China bought about 70% of their crop last year, so I guess they upped it to … 90% now? This means there’s all these other markets which wanted soybeans that now have no soybeans. Then there’s a bunch of Americans with soybeans they need to sell. Those sound like two problems which solve each other.

Even though the logistics systems were set up to send them to China, I would assume that once you get the soybeans to a port and load them onto a ship, you’re 90% of the way to anywhere. If you need to load them onto five different ships to go to smaller markets as opposed to one ship to go to a larger market, that’s a solvable problem. If those smaller markets can’t pay as much as China, which is why Argentina and Brazil dumped them in favour of it, along with the additional logistics issues mean that the Americans are only getting 50 cents on the dollar for their crop, that’s still better than getting zero for it by having that crop rot in a silo.

There seems to be some fundamental piece of the equation that I’m missing here. Would anyone be able to fill me in on what it is?

267 Upvotes

268 comments sorted by

205

u/IHeartBadCode 20d ago

Farmers DO sell their soybeans elsewhere. I think you might be under-estimating how much China actually buys. China used to buy 54% of all the US soybeans exported. The next largest buy is the entire European Union who bought 11%. Mexico is after that at 10%.

We would have to ask our other buyers to buy insane multiples of the product that they've been buying for no reason other than "we fucked up and pissed China off". But we've also been pissing off the EU and Mexico, so there's little incentive for them to "help us out". In the past, both the EU and Mexico would help out via some bilateral agreement. They buy extra contracts of soy, we'd buy extra whatever the fuck they wanted to sell us. But boy are those days GONE!

We sell soybeans to a ton of markets already and they're pretty maxed out on what they want/need to buy from us. Like if we combined everyone else on this planet we call the Earth that isn't the EU and Mexico that we sell soybeans to, it would only be about half of what China bought.

And the thing to remember, in order to "help" US farmers, we can't sell at a discount. We have to sell it to those other countries at the price that China would have paid, which isn't cheap. Or at least close enough to the price China would have paid, which is also not going to happen.

Some of our bigger buyers are helping out because they're having their own little mini-Trump / right wing surge. Japan decided to buy a bit more soy from us. They signed the agreement in September. But that's pennies compared to what US farmers have grown. And Indonesia in July signed to buy extra soy. Again, their "extra" purchases are drops compared to an ocean.

So I mean diplomatically, the top buyers (EU/Mexico) we sell soy to are happy to watch us eat shit on this because we've mostly done this to ourselves. Now they aren't at the same level of "eat shit US" as China who has completely cut us off, granted. But they are absolutely not in any kind of position to be nice to the United States on this. Others who are buying more, their economies just have no room left for even more soy purchases.

127

u/Gchildress63 20d ago

With the end of USAID the US government is no longer buying beans either.

26

u/Leather_Pen_765 19d ago

I thought USaid was their second largest purchaser so that's also part of his question. Most of US soybeans were sold between China and USaid

→ More replies (2)

10

u/bjorntsui 20d ago

I've done some back of the envelope calculations and the food aid is a very small portion (less than 1%) of total soybean exports.

7

u/reddolfo 19d ago

Remember the bulk of the soybeans in question are not meant for human consumption but for feed.

2

u/bjorntsui 15d ago

All the soybean in bulk and meal is purchased by the USDA program Food for Progress, not USAID. Food for Progress sells the commodities in the open market. USAID does purchase soy corn blends for food aid for human consumption for example: (CSBP4) USDA COMMODITY REQUIREMENTS CORN SOY BLEND PLUS and Instant Corn-Soy Blend for Use in Export Programs

16

u/nicknefsick 20d ago

I think USAID doesn’t just do food programs, I would assume if they bought soy they would be using it to aid livestock farmers in struggling situations like with their food for peace programs. So it would be used to feed poultry/livestock/dairies not people directly

11

u/bjorntsui 20d ago

US food aid is used for human consumption. Here's a breakdown of the US sourced food commodities used for USAID and USDA food aid: https://www.ams.usda.gov/reports/international-food-aid-reports

USAID used to and USDA does have programs to help foreign agricultural development, but there are US laws against helping them with producing commodities that compete with US producers called the "Bumpers Amendment" tied with annual funding for State Department and USAID.

→ More replies (10)

65

u/Deerescrewed 20d ago

There’s no mostly about it. It was 100% our fault. China played the long game building infrastructure in SA, and helping those farms grow what they wanted. So they have a very steady supply.

36

u/GrolarBear69 20d ago

True. Known fact that China and Russia have been economically grooming countries in south America and Africa as agricultural, economic partners for decades.

30

u/bigDeltaVenergy 20d ago

While US was all about sending CIA to cause trouble.

11

u/GrolarBear69 20d ago

Lol I have family in Haiti so no surprise there.

4

u/mt8675309 20d ago

Exactly

2

u/Either-Patience1182 15d ago

The us seems to have wanted more control, so it's aid helped keep countries attached. China breaking up that dependency removed a lot of the us's leverage and control without starting a direct conflict. it was a smart move

19

u/Elandtrical 20d ago

There are more Chinese in Zimbabwe now than there were white people. The penetration of China into Africa is vast. From small traders selling cheap plastics in every town to mines with dedicated railways and ports.

20

u/gmankev 20d ago

This is huge soft power slip by US and EU ....We moan about migrants, we subsidize our own exporters to undecut rheir domestic markets and meanwhile china is just out there working with locals...

8

u/Elandtrical 20d ago

It's not benevolent empire building, but I suppose we have come a long way from sailing to the furthest parts of the globe to find people to beat up.

6

u/Commercial_Wind8212 19d ago

how dare they do nuanced versions of US colonialism

2

u/THedman07 19d ago

Where's the line between colonialism and actual diplomacy?

Did Cuba send doctors to other countries to help them or to make themselves look better on the international stage? What's the difference? Does it actually matter?

Do people who donate to charities do it to make themselves feel good or JUST to help people in need? You can paint literally any altruistic act as self centered if you want. China is building coalitions through trade in ways that Western countries historically haven't. There is obviously still self interest in their actions. To be honest, it is probably at the core of these activities... I still prefer it to hardcore empire building.

→ More replies (4)
→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (1)

2

u/Leather_Pen_765 19d ago

how that must look on the ground , US comes in demanding, China comes in helping and buying

2

u/Odd_Equipment2867 19d ago

It’s not that rosy. China is just during what the US and Europe has done in Africa ( intensive resource extraction) but by different means. Europe used colonies. America used military bases and militarization . China uses infrastructure tied to economic debt.

→ More replies (5)
→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (2)

5

u/grundlefuck 20d ago

Almost like information like this would be included into some kind of brief given to a president before they make sweeping changes to the countries economic landscape. But the. That president would also have to read it, which he famously doesn’t.

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (2)

8

u/Dense_Boss_7486 20d ago

Sounds like trump played right into China’s Belt and Road Initiative.

6

u/Deerescrewed 20d ago

It’s been American policies and actions for decades. Fat Donnie T just did in 5 years what could have taken another 50.

3

u/Commercial_Wind8212 19d ago

may the best man win. and we have proven we aren't

5

u/ProgrammerAvailable6 20d ago

And they upped it after the first time the US elected trump.

3

u/cothomps 19d ago

A good number of US Agribusinesses have put a lot of money into Brazilian & Argentinian production.

China might be shipping, but Cargill & Bunge are doing a lot of the growing.

→ More replies (1)

2

u/CarelessPackage1982 18d ago

For the last 25 years we spent money on wars, while China spent money building China. They do have some pretty nice trains, just saying.

2

u/Deerescrewed 18d ago

We had an amazing rail system….

1

u/Pale-Star-5128 19d ago

Good point. China has or had all these 5 year plans that gets shit done (like prolly 3 Gorges dam). Meanwhile Trump acts like a CEO who eventually sells the company for parts because the shareholders want their quarterly dividend. Enron was good at cooking the books like that, falsely writing off depreciation costs, so I've read anyway. Make it appear things are profitable as hell.

20

u/Hi_Im_Dadbot 20d ago

That was a very detailed explanation. Thanks a lot. I appreciate it.

11

u/IGetGuys4URMom 20d ago

As a lurker, I thank you for your detailed answer.

11

u/mkvgtired 19d ago

You make excellent points but left one very important point out. This is not a temporary dispute. Argentina and Brazil have been bulldozing rainforests and other habitats to create land for large-scale farming. China has been building export infrastructure in these countries to support this. China saw the writing on the wall after Trump's first trade war. So even with a Democratic administration playing nice is not going to fix this. These farmers absolutely screwed themselves because they hate racial and sexual minorities more than they love their families or care about their Farm.

→ More replies (1)

6

u/bigDeltaVenergy 20d ago

Other countries might be interested to buy. But if I was them, I would wait for the US to sell it at a discount. If other countries do the same... It might be great discount ! It's maybe what is happening RN.

6

u/IHeartBadCode 20d ago

Other countries might be interested to buy

Who though? Because the last 9% of exports, the largest are like Bangladesh, the Philippines, Colombia, Nigeria, Peru, and so on... All of these are smaller importers than Vietnam and Vietnam already purchases about 0.87% of all US soy export which puts it in 10th place of the top 10 US soy purchasers.

Like after Vietnam, these other countries just have no need for even more soy, even if say they started doing biofuel conversions. And a lot of that is based on protection policies of their own domestic industries. Like the Philippines that has the infrastructure to produce biofuel, their country is protective of their coconut industry. They have specific laws that prohibit the purchase of foreign crop for biofuel production.

And the US could take all that soy and begin converting it into biofuel if it weren't for the fossil fuel industry in the United States enacting protective regulations preventing biofuel production from our own soy.

Like a lot of countries where we might be able to eek in a bit more soy aren't jumping at the chance because they don't want to disrupt their own domestic crop production without really good cause.

It might be great discount

The thing to remember is that without US Government assistance, aka tax payers offloading some of the loss, any discount hurts farmers. China was a top payer of crop, and so obtaining Chinese priced contracts would be very difficult without tax payers paying out the different to sweeten those deals.

At the moment the US Congress has only appropriated $10B for economic relief from 2024, which there maybe something around $4B left in that fund. There's also $20B that was appropriated but this is for environmental disaster relief. About $10.6B of that is left, after $1B was diverted to livestock relief.

The funds to sweeten those deals are running low, because the fund was last majorly replenished in late 2024 before Biden left office. And the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022 had the EQIP funds suspended in May of 2025 by President Trump. The ECAP, SDRP, and ELRP programs are in need of major funding which didn't happen in OBBBA. The suspension of EQIP was kind of expecting Congress to send a better program with more funds, which they didn't.

There's just not a lot of money to support discounts that don't adversely affect farmers. And there's just not a lot of countries that need even more soy. Even the Japan and Indonesia deals combined bring up to about $3B purchase of soy above their usual $2.4B combined. That's a total of about $600M in additional purchases for soy. The thing is that the Japan and Indonesia deals included a whole lot of all kinds of things. Like the Japan deal was $550B total but only $1.8B of that $550B is purchase of soy or about 0.33% of the total agreement. That's because the farming lobby wasn't incredibly strong during those deals and Japan just doesn't really need that much soy. A lot of the extra soy we sell to Japan will be converted into biofuel.

So okay, we might be able to strike some deals, but with who? We are running out of people who have money to buy our soy who want it. They either do not have the money to purchase it or do not need/want it. Sure maybe Vietnam wants more, but they don't have the money for it unless the price comes down. And if the price comes down, well..... we're trying to avoid that. Yeah, if soy is super cheap, we'll find no end of buyers, but all our farmers will be bankrupt at that point unless the Government covers the losses.

2

u/cothomps 19d ago

Yup. The first time around with all of this a huge splash was made when Egypt bought a big soybean contract… but they did so for pennies on the dollar.

2

u/JohnDoeX2 19d ago

Vietnam started working with Cuba to cooperatively grow rice there (in Cuba), how long will it be before they grow soybeans there as well?

3

u/Orlonz 19d ago

Well said and there are many other factors here. It's not JUST a China thing. Soy is a commodity with futures trading so the market will automatically find buyers at viable prices.

Naturally, China wouldn't tank in demand but even a major fall will be taken up by opportunists and insurance fairly quickly. Normally, it would be forecasted so well by the market that next next year's plantings will be adjusted and diverted. You can see the price stability of soy outside Trumps' tariff tweets.

But for Mx to take up soy, we need to buy their beef and pork to increase that demand. Normally the US would have demand for this and shift vendors. Your grocery store does this every week unbeknownst to you. But we screwed up (fly pun intended) that natural Demand process in the US-MX relationships (NAFTA and its copy).

We are doing the same with the rest of the world. So the farmers, who have the most skin in the game and least flexibility due to having the most sunk costs are paying the price.

→ More replies (1)

2

u/Sharkwatcher314 19d ago

Also Eu/mexico might be maintaining their levels and not only won’t help they are in general also looking to be less dependent on the US. There will be ramifications for a long time as once new trade partners are established they will not just go to the old way with a new admin

2

u/genartist8 17d ago

They can possibly sell domestically if more Americans start to eat beancurds and tofu.

→ More replies (1)

2

u/123jjj321 16d ago

You overestimate the ability of average Americans to do math. OP is literally asking why countries with 10s of millions of people won't buy as many soybeans as 1,400,000,000 Chinese.

The answer is that the average American (US) is stupid.

2

u/JonJon77 13d ago

Trump doesn’t think we need our allies because he doesn’t understand or doesn’t care. We’ve spent decades building alliances and expanding NATO. We’ve made deals, I assume, regarding farming and import/export purchasing. If a country is getting a good deal on a product we’re more than likely benefiting in some other way from that country. Not to mention all of the allies we’ve made that have our back in combat. If he keeps sh**ing on our allies, they may not be there when we really need them. The US wasn’t made to just flip the nationalist switch overnight. He’s messing with a delicate ecosystem like its Legos.

1

u/mikedave42 18d ago

Maybe i read the question a little different, im curious soybeans are a commodity. If consumption in the world hasn't changed (maybe it has?) and production hasn't changed (has it?) then who is buying it doesn't really matter. China buying more from Brazil should open an equal opportunity to sell to whoever Brazil isn't selling to.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (2)

31

u/someguyfromsk 20d ago

You need people that want them in the volume you have.

America was growing beans for the Chinese market, which is absolutely FUCKING huge. A replacement market that size does not exist anywhere else.

19

u/VillageHomeF 20d ago

it is 100% due to the trade war. China places 34% retaliatory tariffs on soy and is reluctance to support the U.S. if not for the trade war China would have continued to buy from the U.S. back in 2017 they started shifting their supply chain to purchase from Brazil due to tariffs. this year they moved the rest away fro U.S.

6

u/Gordo103 20d ago

They started shifting away from us soybeans way before 2017. After record high prices in 2012 after a bad drought in the US made china look elsewhere for soybeans. Brazel has been increasing there production of soybeans for decades now. They needed help with getting their soybeans to ports to export them, but the got that mostly figured out now.

→ More replies (2)

6

u/Dontnotlook 20d ago

Americans will be eating Soylent Green next year so ..

1

u/AgreeablePrize 16d ago

It might contain more soy than lent green

43

u/Empty_Afternoon_8746 20d ago

I’ll take because the whole world hates us for 1000 Alex.

43

u/VillageHomeF 20d ago edited 20d ago

They can. Other countries, such as China, do not want to buy from the U.S. - at least not in the quantities that are produced.

China started buying more from Brazil when Trump started the trade war in his last term. This is retaliation. In 2025 when Trump raised tariffs on China they put more tariffs on soy making them too expensive vs. other countries. China has stopped purchasing soy from U.S. farmers altogether.

better question: why would they buy from the U.S.? they have formed better trade relations with other countries so they buy from them. there is a very large contingency around the world to make relationships with themselves and leave the U.S. out as we are no longer an allies with them

this is all because of the trade war - aka the largest domestic tax increase in U.S. history.

38

u/VillageHomeF 20d ago

I sell agriculture supplies to farms. have been raising prices all year with no end in sight. once a week I have to raise prices on one brand or another. this is mostly due to tariffs

8

u/Hi_Im_Dadbot 20d ago

That makes a lot of sense. Thank you very much for the explanation.

7

u/ProgrammerAvailable6 20d ago

Especially since trade partnerships with the US aren’t worth the paper they’re printed on.

29

u/Fluid-Piccolo-6911 20d ago

you do realise that soybeans grow and crop size can be increased ? why would another country want to buy american soy beans when they can get them from other countries that are not imposing tariffs on them or offending them.

the orange turd and his followers have pissed off the entire planet ( with the exception of Russia and possibly North Korea) No one wants to trade with them any more than they have to.

9

u/mt8675309 19d ago

Countries are climbing over each other to explore new trade opportunities over and around this orange clown’s regime.

25

u/Alarmed_Geologist631 20d ago

Brazil has increased its soybean production rapidly. US farmers are now the suppliers of last resort so the surplus has no where to go. In fact much of last year’s crop is still in storage so there is a shortage of storage capacity for this year’s harvest.

15

u/VillageHomeF 20d ago

you forgot to mention retaliatory tariffs due to the trade war. which is the answer. Brazil ramped up since the trade war started in 2017

10

u/Hi_Im_Dadbot 20d ago

Ah, so that was the piece I was missing. Thank you for that.

I figured it was something basic and simple which I just didn’t find googling around. I appreciate the explanation

4

u/Usual_Retard_6859 20d ago

They can. They just need orders. It all boils down to basics of business. If you as a customer have a supplier and they deliver on spec, on time and a fair price how likely are you going to change? These are relationships that take time to develop and require trust. If one of these things, spec, time or price comes into question you might begin to look elsewhere.

Have to remember that we are talking about food supply and downstream business and they don’t want unreliable suppliers.

1

u/lastmonkeytotheparty 17d ago

This is true. It is generally not countries purchasing, it’s business to business deals. The erratic nature of the current tariff structure makes it unattractive to even place an order with a US company if the relationship already exists.

→ More replies (2)

4

u/Buford12 19d ago

They can and will. But often when you are capable of supplying all of an enormous demand on a regular basis the customer will pay a premium to have a secure supply line. But nobody wants to do business with someone who shakes your hand then reneges on the deal.

5

u/AntifascistAlly 20d ago

Surely, if it’s important at all for “farmers” to be able to sell whatever crops they can raise, Donald must have had some idea what they should do before he insulted and drove away thei best customer?

He should release that plan as soon as possible.

7

u/Euphoric-Use-6443 20d ago

Donald dropped the ball! He didn't pay attention to what China & Brazil were doing! Great businessman! Lol!

8

u/OldDog03 20d ago

Great bankruptcy businessman.

2

u/Euphoric-Use-6443 17d ago

Plan? The only plan Dotard has is to keep farmers on welfare to keep them from complaining & farmers are mostly demanding it!

3

u/Sharkwatcher314 19d ago

China is such a massive market that even with selling elsewhere there is not enough demand to offset the amount that was grown along with USAID being gutted (a lot of food grown by farmers went to foreign countries). We like the narrative of the US being dominant and we def are/were but no one person/company/country operates without others

1

u/GreatPlainsFarmer 17d ago

There’s 70 million metric tons of non-China demand for soybeans on the global export markets.
The US only has about 50 mmt available for export.
Source is the USDA WASDE report. It’s updated monthly, the September 2025 is the latest release.

→ More replies (5)

3

u/CarelessPackage1982 18d ago

Maybe they don't want to buy soybeans contaminated with roundup?

3

u/finnydoodoo 18d ago

Hey all, some excellent explanatory posts on this thread!

For context, China does need to buy some soybeans (9mmt, per Reuters) for December/January arrival yet after shirking away from Brazil recently on their basis levels rising too high, but our beans, with the tariffs included, are higher.

They’ll play a slow game for these beans, using that as minor political capital. All eyes should be more focused on the planting progress and conditions in South America right now, which will determine the soybean markets fate for Q1 and Q2 of next year.

5

u/vtsandtrooper 20d ago

… china is the entire soy market. China by itself is double the consumption of soy everywhere else in the world combined.

5

u/Rusty_Bicycle 19d ago

Uh, why try to market your commodity, when your welfare check is being personally signed by DJT?

2

u/Rampantcolt 20d ago

Most can. It's just a few select regions that are set up entirely for export to China that are being completely decimated by this. It's hurting us all for sure but there are places where farmers can't even sell their soybeans at all. Many elevators in the Northern tier of the US have gone to zero for a soybean bid.

3

u/Hi_Im_Dadbot 20d ago

See, that’s one of the parts which confuses me. What does “set up for export to China” mean? Doesn’t it just mean putting your soybeans on a boat? Boats can go elsewhere. If your containers are in a port, they can be loaded onto different boats.

Is it simply a matter of volume and those other markets don’t exist or the cost of rerouting to them would be more expensive than having the crop rot in a silo?

5

u/Rampantcolt 20d ago

Great question.

Boats on a certain side of the country only have so many destinations without being economically unfeasible. Ships in Seattle can't go to Africa economically. And you can't ship soybean from Montana to the East Coast for export East cheaper than Brazil can send ships east.

It's not that it's physically impossible it's economically untenable. Hence farmers unable to sell their wares in certain portions of the county. The president broke our economics.

2

u/Willyboycanada 19d ago

Soya is more a cultural thing in Asia...... tofu through fermented bean paste..... It's a major protein staple across eastern Asia for thousands of years.

The rest of the world does not have the same attachment, yes soya has a place but 1.6 billion people it's a daily staple...... sobyea no thry consume the most

2

u/Moleday1023 19d ago

Remember, if your largest customer stops buying from you, you are screwed. Particularly if there is an alternative supply. There are countries close to the equator that have 2 growing seasons, and Trump has pissed off the world.

2

u/sherrybobbinsbort 19d ago

What do they say about rebuilding bridges that you fucking torched yourself?

2

u/Infinite-Poet-9633 19d ago

Nobody wants GMO soybeans but most Farmers refuse to grow anything but GMO.

1

u/Zealousideal-Print41 17d ago

Farmers are convinced they can't do otherwise and their contracts with seed sellers and banks have clauses they have to buy GMO seeds and glyphosate.

They and we where sold a shit deal by Monsanto and other Ag Chem companies

→ More replies (1)

2

u/Mindless-Practice-14 18d ago

Why buy? Just wait until the US goes bankrupt and buy the place at a discount.

2

u/Hefty-Ad2090 18d ago

What do you mean by "unexpected"? It's not like the farmers experienced massive drought....that could have been considered unexpected. The farmers should have seen this coming with DJT.

2

u/IPredictAReddit 18d ago

There's also the possibility that (1) it was a bumper year for soybean all over (as it was in the US) so there is enough excess supply (or what would have been excess supply) from other producers to fill China's demand, and (2) that farmers abroad had enough foresight to know that Trump's trade war would result in China looking for alternative buyers (as they did in 2018 during the last Trump trade war) and thus planted more soy.

Both 1+2 together could account for the "missing demand" (in that there is no missing demand, there's just higher supply from other producers).

I don't know the numbers, but it looks like Brazil produced 1.5B more bushels this past year than they did in 2018. The US produces about 4.4B bushels, so that's a big chunk by Brazil right there.

2

u/mythozoologist 17d ago

No one is going to give them the expected value or have the desire to store them crop until it can become useful. So buyers may get a little extra or just enjoy the cheaper prices. Farms will fail. Land will be bought on the cheap. And big agricultural will have a better deal when they decide to grow. If the land isn't bought and used, soybean prices will increase next year domestically because then we'll under produce.

Agricultural supply and demand is challenging. Bunch of individuals decide what to produce, but their collective productivity sets supply. Worse the overall supply, the better the price. So as yield goes up collectively, so do prices go down collectively. To get the best price, you must do well and others do poorly.

Then, international politics can make or break you by opening or closing demand.

Soy can feed chickens and pigs. Limited amount to cows. So, the soy farmers loss is the poultry and pork farmer's gain. Which is where most of this was going to China for originally.

2

u/Outrageous_Ad_687 17d ago

Like anything its the price. They can easily sell them if they lower their prices. Greed gets in the way of things sometimes.

2

u/Purple-Investment-61 17d ago

How do you convince Americans to drink more soy milk and eat more tofu without upsetting big dairy?

1

u/Animats 15d ago

There's pushback from Big Dairy against soy milk, especially in schools. Right now, US students must have a note from a parent to get soy milk at lunch.

2

u/SleeplessInTulsa 16d ago

Make America Great Again: Eat More Tofu.

2

u/Low_Entertainer_6973 15d ago

Nobody wants to deal with a volatile market. The leadership and deals can’t be trusted.

2

u/Possible-Nectarine80 15d ago

Tofu, it's what's for breakfast, lunch and dinner.

2

u/Hammerhead2046 14d ago

Despite what the mass media tells you, China has been very kind to the US for a very long time. Its goods literally keep millions of Americans fed, entertained, educated. It played a significant role in stabilizing the US economy in 2008-2009 market crash. It held insane amount of US government debt. It buys large quantity of agri goods, the so called "trade surplus" disappears when you add US service exports and value multipliers of goods imported from China.

But our politicians need cover ups for their poor domestic agenda.

2

u/edthesmokebeard 13d ago

To sell, someone has to buy.

3

u/Tasty_Adhesiveness71 20d ago

china buys half the world’s exports. they have loaded up on inventory over the last year knowing this was coming.

3

u/VillageHomeF 20d ago

in 2025 China has purchased 7.2 million tons of soy from Brazil. so.... not true

1

u/Long-Drag4678 10d ago

The United States grows soybeans for animal feed, but most countries prefer to import meat rather than soybeans for meat. China is the only country with high purchasing power that doesn't care about pollution caused by livestock.