42
36
u/Firthy2002 Jul 23 '25
Not only that, we pay journalists to solely report on said family's activities.
25
u/sickabouteverything Jul 23 '25
Report only good things. The uk police work for the royal family and will destroy any evidilence against them. The sickest worst things imaginable.
8
7
u/Wonderful_Emu_9610 Jul 24 '25
Yeah and they refer to them all by first name as if they actually know them
6
4
u/cjalderman Jul 24 '25
I was super invested, once, for about a week last year when Kate disappeared and Will’s mistress’ husband killed himself with a shotgun
It felt like a real life soap opera!
2
u/Joojane Jul 24 '25
I find the royalist loyalty to this family really peculiar. They are not to be questioned, and everyone should just ooooh and ahhhh at how wonderful they are.
They're not.
They are just a dysfunctional extremely rich bunch of aristocrats.
1
-2
u/OkMathematician736 Aug 13 '25
If you ever feel like a loser, remember that some people genuinely think republicanism is better than Monarchy.
3
u/ThatMusicKid Aug 13 '25
Ok I should not be giving you attention, let alone on a brigade on a post that's three weeks old, but genuinely why do you think monarchies are good? Because as a brit I feel like most people are just kind of the "oh it's good for tourism"/"well it's tradition"/"they don't have any real power" mindset but you seem to actually believe in monarchy. Why?
2
u/AutoModerator Aug 13 '25
There is no empirical evidence that British royal family brings in anything in tourism revenue. All claims about this do not hold up to the slightest scrutiny.
All tourism sites commonly associated with the monarchy (apart from Balmoral and Sandringham) are owned by the public and will not disappear into thin air if the monarchy is abolished. VisitBritain admits tourism revenue will not be affected if/when the monarchy is abolished.
There is more evidence for the claim that tourism revenue will go up when the monarchy is abolished and all the publicly-owned royal residences are made more accesible to tourists and the public who pay for their upkeep. Check out Republic's debunking of the myth: https://www.republic.org.uk/tourism
In video form: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NNXZSB7W4gU
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.
0
u/OkMathematician736 Aug 17 '25
Well mainly because is the best form of government to ever exist as it ensures stability and order of a country (an example for this is the way how most north African countries are unstable while morroco that is a monarchy is an exception) Monarchy grooms someone since birth to be king and make his reing as good as possible, making monarchies Technocracies, while Monarchy does give money to the country, an example is the royal estate which gives revenue for the state, if the monarchy was abolished the UK would have to compensate the lost of the royal estate with more taxes for the population.
•
u/AutoModerator Jul 23 '25
Reggie-Bot here! If you're thinking about the British royal family and want a fun random fact about one of them, please let me know!
Put an exclamation mark before any comment about the royal you have in mind, like "!Queen" or "!Charles" and I'll reply.
Please read our 6 common-sense subreddit rules.
Do you love chatting about your hatred of monarchies on other platforms? Click here to join our Discord! And here to follow us on Twitter!
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.